|
Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Randomized, Open Label, Parallel Assignment |
| Condition: |
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 |
| Interventions: |
Drug: Insulin glargine Drug: Inhaled Insulin (Exubera) |
Participant Flow
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| No text entered. |
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| No text entered. |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Insulin Glargine | Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Insulin Glargine | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 219 | 194 |
| Received Treatment | 212 | 190 |
| COMPLETED | 136 | 152 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 83 | 42 |
| Adverse Event | 7 | 1 |
| Lack of Efficacy | 1 | 3 |
| Lost to Follow-up | 10 | 4 |
| Withdrawal by Subject | 31 | 7 |
| Unknown | 27 | 23 |
| Randomized but did not receive treatment | 7 | 4 |
Baseline Characteristics
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Insulin Glargine | Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Insulin Glargine | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants [units: participants] |
212 | 190 | 402 |
|
Age, Customized [units: participants] |
|||
| 18 to 44 years | 27 | 26 | 53 |
| 45 to 65 years | 151 | 125 | 276 |
| >=65 years | 34 | 39 | 73 |
|
Gender [units: participants] |
|||
| Female | 92 | 84 | 176 |
| Male | 120 | 106 | 226 |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 26 for the Per Protocol (PP) Population |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 26 for the Per Protocol (PP) Population |
| Measure Description | HbA1c lab value: Change = value at Week 26 minus value at Baseline. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, Week 26 |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Per protocol (PP)=Full Analysis Set (FAS) subjects (i.e., had >=1 study drug dose and >=1 post-baseline measurement) with >=12 weeks treatment and no major protocol violation. LOCF imputed missing data with any post-baseline visit. Number of subjects with HbA1c values at Baseline and Week 26: inhaled human insulin n=154, insulin glargine n=157. |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Insulin Glargine | Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Insulin Glargine | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
154 | 157 |
|
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 26 for the Per Protocol (PP) Population
[units: percent] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
-2.01 ± 1.39 | -1.75 ± 1.40 |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Non-Inferiority/Equivalence Test [2] | Yes |
| Method [3] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [4] | <0.0001 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [5] | -0.19 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.38 to 0 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| The null hypothesis was that the inhaled human insulin group was inferior to the insulin glargine group with respect to 26-week change from baseline in HbA1c, while the alternate hypothesis is that the inhaled human insulin group was not inferior to the insulin glargine group with respect to 26-week change from baseline in HbA1c, given the predetermined non-inferiority margin of 0.4%. | |
| [2] | Details of power calculation, definition of non-inferiority margin, and other key parameters: |
| The non-inferiority test utilized a one-sided 2.5% level of significance. | |
| [3] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [4] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. | |
| [5] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| A confidence interval (CI) approach was presented with a two-sided 95% CI of the difference between treatment and control. |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.0516 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | -0.19 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.38 to 0 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| With an established non-inferiority claim, an additional test for superiority was conducted (ie, the margin was 0.0%). | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| The superiority test used a one-sided 2.5% level of significance. |
| 2. Secondary: | Percentage of Subjects Achieving Glycemic Control (HbA1c < 6.5%) at Week 26 |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Percentage of Subjects Achieving Glycemic Control (HbA1c < 6.5%) at Week 26 |
| Measure Description | Percentage of subjects with glycosylated hemoglobin A1c lab value less than 6.5%. |
| Time Frame | Week 26 |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| FAS=all subjects who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline measurement. LOCF imputed missing data with any post-baseline visit. Number of subjects with HbA1c < 6.5% at Week 26: inhaled human insulin n=72, insulin glargine n=42. |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Insulin Glargine | Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Insulin Glargine | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
203 | 189 |
|
Percentage of Subjects Achieving Glycemic Control (HbA1c < 6.5%) at Week 26
[units: percentage of participants] |
35.5 | 22.2 |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | Regression, Logistic |
| P Value [3] | 0.0052 |
| Odds Ratio (OR) [4] | 1.96 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( 1.22 to 3.14 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| 3. Secondary: | Percentage of Subjects Achieving Glycemic Control (HbA1c < 7.0%) at Week 26 |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Percentage of Subjects Achieving Glycemic Control (HbA1c < 7.0%) at Week 26 |
| Measure Description | Percentage of subjects with glycosylated hemoglobin A1c lab value less than 7.0%. |
| Time Frame | Week 26 |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| FAS=all subjects who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline measurement. LOCF imputed missing data with any post-baseline visit. Number of subjects with HbA1c < 7.0% at Week 26: inhaled human insulin n=127, insulin glargine n=90. |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Insulin Glargine | Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Insulin Glargine | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
203 | 189 |
|
Percentage of Subjects Achieving Glycemic Control (HbA1c < 7.0%) at Week 26
[units: percentage of participants] |
62.6 | 47.6 |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | Regression, Logistic |
| P Value [3] | 0.0022 |
| Odds Ratio (OR) [4] | 2.01 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( 1.29 to 3.15 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| 4. Secondary: | Percentage of Subjects Achieving Glycemic Control (HbA1c < 8.0%) at Week 26 |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Percentage of Subjects Achieving Glycemic Control (HbA1c < 8.0%) at Week 26 |
| Measure Description | Number of subjects with glycosylated hemoglobin A1c lab value less than 8.0%. |
| Time Frame | Week 26 |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| FAS=all subjects who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline measurement. LOCF imputed missing data with any post-baseline visit. Number of subjects with HbA1c < 8.0% at Week 26: inhaled human insulin n=162, insulin glargine n=158. |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Insulin Glargine | Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Insulin Glargine | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
203 | 189 |
|
Percentage of Subjects Achieving Glycemic Control (HbA1c < 8.0%) at Week 26
[units: percentage of participants] |
79.8 | 83.6 |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | Regression, Logistic |
| P Value [3] | 0.2480 |
| Odds Ratio (OR) [4] | 0.71 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( 0.40 to 1.27 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| 5. Secondary: | Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 26 |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 26 |
| Measure Description | Fasting plasma glucose lab value: Change = value at Week 26 minus value at Baseline. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, Week 26 |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| FAS=all subjects who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline measurement. LOCF imputed missing data with any post-baseline visit. Number of subjects with fasting plasma glucose at Baseline and Week 26: inhaled human insulin n=202, insulin glargine n=189. |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Insulin Glargine | Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Insulin Glargine | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
203 | 189 |
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 26
[units: mg/dL] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
-52.77 ± 69.48 | -53.50 ± 62.92 |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.6091 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | 2.57 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -7.31 to 12.46 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| 6. Secondary: | Change From Baseline in Fasting and Postprandial Blood Glucose as Determined by Standardized Meal Tolerance Tests at Week 26 |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change From Baseline in Fasting and Postprandial Blood Glucose as Determined by Standardized Meal Tolerance Tests at Week 26 |
| Measure Description | Postprandial blood glucose lab value (Time 0 min [fasting], Time 30 min, Time 60 min, Time 90 min, Time 120 min, Time 180 min): Change = value at Week 26 minus value at Baseline. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, Week 26 |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| FAS=all subjects who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline measurement. LOCF imputed missing data with any post-baseline visit. Number of subjects with fasting and postprandial blood glucose measurements determined by standardized meal tolerance tests at Baseline and Week 26: n=inhaled human insulin, insulin glargine. |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Insulin Glargine | Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Insulin Glargine | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
203 | 189 |
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting and Postprandial Blood Glucose as Determined by Standardized Meal Tolerance Tests at Week 26
[units: mg/dL] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
||
| Time 0 at Week 26 (n=105, 119) | -35.22 ± 51.12 | -61.16 ± 54.68 |
| Time 30 at Week 26 (n=95, 107) | -49.91 ± 62.41 | -66.02 ± 62.32 |
| Time 60 at Week 26 (n=110, 118) | -56.83 ± 69.81 | -64.77 ± 64.47 |
| Time 90 at Week 26 (n=114, 120) | -64.94 ± 75.67 | -58.85 ± 64.58 |
| Time 120 at Week 26 (n=113, 124) | -66.59 ± 74.69 | -54.89 ± 63.02 |
| Time 180 at Week 26 (n=114, 122) | -66.99 ± 74.19 | -51.27 ± 59.92 |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | <0.0001 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | 32.96 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( 22.66 to 43.25 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Time 0 (fasting) at Week 26. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | <0.0001 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | 28.57 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( 16.55 to 40.59 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Time 30 at Week 26. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.0044 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | 18.96 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( 5.96 to 31.96 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Time 60 at Week 26. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.3168 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | 6.69 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -6.45 to 19.83 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Time 90 at Week 26. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.9222 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | 0.63 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -12.12 to 13.39 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Time 120 at Week 26. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.6950 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | -2.41 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -14.51 to 9.69 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Time 180 at Week 26. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| 7. Secondary: | Change From Baseline in Postprandial Blood Glucose as Measured by 8-Point Profiles at Week 26 |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change From Baseline in Postprandial Blood Glucose as Measured by 8-Point Profiles at Week 26 |
| Measure Description | Post-prandial=after a meal. 8-point scale: (1 = before breakfast, 2 = 2 hours post breakfast, 3 = before lunch, 4 = 2 hours post lunch, 5 = before dinner, 6 = 2 hours post dinner, 7 = at bedtime, 8 = overnight [between 2 and 4 am]). Postprandial blood glucose lab value: Change = value at Week 26 minus value at Baseline. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, Week 26 |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| FAS = all subjects who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline measurement. LOCF imputed missing data with any post-baseline visit. Number of subjects with postprandial blood glucose measurements as measured by 8-point profiles at Baseline and Week 26: n=inhaled human insulin, insulin glargine. |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Insulin Glargine | Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Insulin Glargine | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
203 | 189 |
|
Change From Baseline in Postprandial Blood Glucose as Measured by 8-Point Profiles at Week 26
[units: mg/dL] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
||
| Post-Breakfast, Week 26 (n=185,171) | -86.61 ± 85.98 | -75.36 ± 79.04 |
| Post-Lunch, Week 26 (n=184, 172) | -86.66 ± 77.49 | -58.51 ± 86.93 |
| Post-Dinner, Week 26 (n=187,166) | -81.86 ± 75.94 | -59.20 ± 86.21 |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.1207 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | -9.61 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -21.76 to 2.54 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Post-Breakfast, Week 26. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | <0.0001 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | -29.11 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -39.77 to -18.44 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Post-Lunch, Week 26. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | <0.0001 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | -33.76 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -44.17 to -23.35 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Post-Dinner, Week 26. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| 8. Secondary: | Change From Baseline in Lipids at Week 26 |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change From Baseline in Lipids at Week 26 |
| Measure Description | Lipid (total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-c], low density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-c], triglycerides) lab value: Change = value at Week 26 minus value at Baseline. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, Week 26 |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| FAS=all subjects who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline measurement. LOCF imputed missing data with any post-baseline visit. Number of subjects with lipids data at Baseline and Week 26: n=inhaled human insulin, insulin glargine. |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Insulin Glargine | Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Insulin Glargine | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
203 | 189 |
|
Change From Baseline in Lipids at Week 26
[units: mg/dL] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
||
| Total cholesterol, Week 26 (n=197, 186) | -2.80 ± 31.97 | -6.19 ± 29.95 |
| HDL-c, Week 26 (n=197, 186) | 2.97 ± 6.99 | 0.69 ± 6.07 |
| LDL-c, Week 26 (n=197, 186) | -2.09 ± 25.74 | -3.71 ± 23.63 |
| Triglycerides, Week 26 (n=197, 187) | -42.65 ± 87.70 | -46.23 ± 147.8 |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.0735 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | 5.21 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.50 to 10.91 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Total Cholesterol at Week 26. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.0017 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | 2.09 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( 0.79 to 3.39 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| HDL-c at Week 26. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.1369 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | 3.43 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -1.10 to 7.96 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| LDL-c at Week 26. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.5684 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | 4.26 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -10.40 to 18.92 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Triglycerides at Week 26. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| 9. Secondary: | Change From Baseline in Cardiovascular (CV) Biomarkers High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP), Leptin, and Spot Urine Microalbumin at Week 26 |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change From Baseline in Cardiovascular (CV) Biomarkers High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP), Leptin, and Spot Urine Microalbumin at Week 26 |
| Measure Description | CV biomarker (hs-CRP, Leptin, and Spot Urine Microalbumin) lab value: Change = value at Week 26 minus value at Baseline. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, Week 26 |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| FAS=all subjects who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline measurement. LOCF imputed missing data with any post-baseline visit. Number of subjects with CV biomarker data (hs-CRP, leptin, and spot urine microalbumin) at Baseline and Week 26: n=inhaled human insulin, insulin glargine. |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Insulin Glargine | Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Insulin Glargine | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
203 | 189 |
|
Change From Baseline in Cardiovascular (CV) Biomarkers High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP), Leptin, and Spot Urine Microalbumin at Week 26
[units: mg/L] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
||
| hs-CRP, Week 26 (n=198, 187) | 0.61 ± 4.56 | 0.32 ± 3.69 |
| Leptin, Week 26 (n=193, 186) | 3.68 ± 13.50 | 4.41 ± 10.50 |
| Spot Urine Microalbumin, Week 26 (n=183, 169) | 3.47 ± 96.48 | 3.70 ± 54.53 |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.5673 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | 0.24 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.58 to 1.06 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| hs-CRP at Week 26. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.6099 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | -0.61 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -2.97 to 1.75 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Leptin at Week 26. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.7684 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | 2.28 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -12.94 to 17.51 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Spot urine microalbumin at Week 26. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| 10. Secondary: | Change From Baseline in CV Biomarkers Adiponectin and Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) at Week 26 |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change From Baseline in CV Biomarkers Adiponectin and Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) at Week 26 |
| Measure Description | CV biomarker (adiponectin and ApoB) lab value: Change = value at Week 26 minus value at Baseline. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, Week 26 |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| FAS=all subjects who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline measurement. LOCF imputed missing data with any post-baseline visit. Number of subjects with CV biomarker data (adiponectin and ApoB) at Baseline and Week 26: n=inhaled human insulin, insulin glargine. |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Insulin Glargine | Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Insulin Glargine | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
203 | 189 |
|
Change From Baseline in CV Biomarkers Adiponectin and Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) at Week 26
[units: mg/mL] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
||
| Adiponectin, Week 26 (n=195, 184) | 0.23 ± 5.58 | -0.32 ± 5.15 |
| ApoB, Week 26 (n=198, 187) | -0.06 ± 0.19 | -0.06 ± 0.17 |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.5005 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | 0.36 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.69 to 1.42 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| Adiponectin at Week 26. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.6850 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | 0.01 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.03 to 0.04 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| ApoB at Week 26. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| 11. Secondary: | Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (CGMS) Glucose Values at Week 26 |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (CGMS) Glucose Values at Week 26 |
| Measure Description | 24-Hour CGMS glucose lab value was obtained using the Medtronic MiniMed CGMS. Not all subjects were offered the opportunity to participate in this assessment. Change = value at Week 26 minus value at Baseline. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, Week 26 |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| FAS-CGMS=all subjects with at least 1 study drug dose, at least 1 post-baseline measurement, and who participated in a 24-hour CGMS substudy. LOCF imputed missing data with any post-baseline visit. Number of subjects who participated in the substudy with 24-hour CGMS values at Baseline and Week 26: inhaled human insulin n=2, insulin glargine n=8. |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Insulin Glargine | Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Insulin Glargine | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
203 | 189 |
|
Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (CGMS) Glucose Values at Week 26
[units: mg/dL] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
-36.53 ± 33.96 | -35.63 ± 58.19 |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.1856 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | 58.70 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -43.37 to 160.77 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| 12. Secondary: | Change From Baseline in Mean Standard Deviation (SD) of 24-Hour Glucose Values Measured by CGMS at Week 26 |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change From Baseline in Mean Standard Deviation (SD) of 24-Hour Glucose Values Measured by CGMS at Week 26 |
| Measure Description | SD of 24-Hour CGMS glucose lab value obtained using the Medtronic MiniMed CGMS. Not all subjects were offered the opportunity to participate in this assessment. Change = value at Week 26 minus value at Baseline. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, Week 26 |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| FAS-CGMS=all subjects with at least 1 study drug dose, at least 1 post-baseline measurement, and who participated in a 24-hour CGMS substudy. LOCF imputed missing data with any post-baseline visit. Number of subjects who participated in the substudy with 24-hour CGMS values at Baseline and Week 26: inhaled human insulin n=2, insulin glargine n=8. |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Insulin Glargine | Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Insulin Glargine | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
203 | 189 |
|
Change From Baseline in Mean Standard Deviation (SD) of 24-Hour Glucose Values Measured by CGMS at Week 26
[units: mg/dL] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
-12.50 ± 2.55 | 4.46 ± 11.51 |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.1862 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | -18.72 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -51.34 to 13.89 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| 13. Secondary: | Number of Subjects With Hypoglycemic Events |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Number of Subjects With Hypoglycemic Events |
| Measure Description | A hypoglycemic event was identified by characteristic symptoms or blood glucose levels. An event was severe if the subject was unable to treat him/herself; had at least 1 neurological symptom; or blood glucose of < = 49 mg/dL. Events not meeting all 3 criteria were considered mild-moderate. Overall=mild, moderate, and severe. |
| Time Frame | Months 1 to 7 |
| Safety Issue | Yes |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety population=all subjects who took at least 1 dose of study drug. Number of subjects with at least 1 hypoglycemic event during the course of the study that were evaluable at the specified month: n=inhaled human insulin, insulin glargine. |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Insulin Glargine | Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Insulin Glargine | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
212 | 190 |
|
Number of Subjects With Hypoglycemic Events
[units: participants] |
||
| Overall at Month 1 (n=147, 83) | 70 | 24 |
| Mild/Moderate at Month 1 (n=147, 83) | 69 | 24 |
| Severe at Month 1 (n=147, 83) | 0 | 0 |
| Overall at Month 2 (n=141, 81) | 98 | 38 |
| Mild/Moderate at Month 2 (n=141, 81) | 98 | 38 |
| Severe at Month 2 (n=141, 81) | 1 | 0 |
| Overall at Month 3 (n=135, 81) | 84 | 35 |
| Mild/Moderate at Month 3 (n=135, 81) | 83 | 35 |
| Severe at Month 3 (n=135, 81) | 3 | 0 |
| Overall at Month 4 (n=120, 80) | 61 | 25 |
| Mild/Moderate at Month 4 (n=120, 80) | 61 | 25 |
| Severe at Month 4 (n=120, 80) | 0 | 0 |
| Overall at Month 5 (n=117, 79) | 55 | 30 |
| Mild/Moderate at Month 5 (n=117, 79) | 55 | 30 |
| Severe at Month 5 (n=117, 79) | 0 | 0 |
| Overall at Month 6 (n=109, 77) | 42 | 31 |
| Mild/Moderate at Month 6 (n=109, 77) | 42 | 31 |
| Severe at Month 6 (n=109, 77) | 0 | 0 |
| Overall at Month 7 (n=77, 60) | 8 | 4 |
| Mild/Moderate at Month 7 (n=77, 60) | 8 | 4 |
| Severe at Month 7 (n=77, 60) | 0 | 0 |
| 14. Secondary: | Number of Total Hypoglycemic Events |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Number of Total Hypoglycemic Events |
| Measure Description | A hypoglycemic event was identified by characteristic symptoms or blood glucose levels. Severe=the subject was unable to treat him/herself; had at least 1 neurological symptom; or blood glucose of < = 49 mg/dL. Events not meeting all 3 criteria were considered mild-moderate. Overall=mild, moderate, and severe. Total=events during the study. |
| Time Frame | Months 1 to 7 |
| Safety Issue | Yes |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety population=all subjects who took at least 1 dose of study drug. Number of subjects with at least 1 hypoglycemic event during the course of the study that were evaluable at the specified month: n=inhaled human insulin, insulin glargine. |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Insulin Glargine | Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Insulin Glargine | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
212 | 190 |
|
Number of Total Hypoglycemic Events
[units: events] |
||
| Overall at Month 1 (n=147, 83) | 195 | 41 |
| Mild/Moderate at Month 1 (n=147, 83) | 194 | 41 |
| Severe at Month 1 (n=147, 83) | 0 | 0 |
| Overall at Month 2 (n=141, 81) | 365 | 66 |
| Mild/Moderate at Month 2 (n=141, 81) | 364 | 66 |
| Severe at Month 2 (n=141, 81) | 1 | 0 |
| Overall at Month 3 (n=135, 81) | 292 | 84 |
| Mild/Moderate at Month 3 (n=135, 81) | 289 | 84 |
| Severe at Month 3 (n=135, 81) | 3 | 0 |
| Overall at Month 4 (n=120, 80) | 166 | 51 |
| Mild/Moderate at Month 4 (n=120, 80) | 166 | 51 |
| Severe at Month 4 (n=120, 80) | 0 | 0 |
| Overall at Month 5 (n=117, 79) | 157 | 64 |
| Mild/Moderate at Month 5 (n=117, 79) | 157 | 64 |
| Severe at Month 5 (n=117, 79) | 0 | 0 |
| Overall at Month 6 (n=109, 77) | 119 | 63 |
| Mild/Moderate at Month 6 (n=109, 77) | 119 | 63 |
| Severe at Month 6 (n=109, 77) | 0 | 0 |
| Overall at Month 7 (n=77, 60) | 12 | 5 |
| Mild/Moderate at Month 7 (n=77, 60) | 12 | 5 |
| Severe at Month 7 (n=77, 60) | 0 | 0 |
| 15. Secondary: | Number of Total Subject Months of Treatment |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Number of Total Subject Months of Treatment |
| Measure Description | Number of total subject months of treatment. Subject months = number of days from start of treatment to the last day of active treatment + 1 day lag, including off-drug time)/30.44. Severe=the subject was unable to treat him/herself; had at least 1 neurological symptom; or blood glucose of < = 49 mg/dL. Events not meeting all 3 criteria were considered mild-moderate. Overall=mild, moderate, and severe. |
| Time Frame | Months 1 to 7 |
| Safety Issue | Yes |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety population=all subjects who took at least 1 dose of study drug. Number of subjects with at least 1 hypoglycemic event during the course of the study that were evaluable at the specified month: n=inhaled human insulin, insulin glargine. |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Insulin Glargine | Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Insulin Glargine | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
212 | 190 |
|
Number of Total Subject Months of Treatment
[units: subject months] |
||
| Overall at Month 1 (n=147, 83) | 145.8 | 82.4 |
| Mild/Moderate at Month 1 (n=147, 83) | 145.8 | 82.4 |
| Severe at Month 1 (n=147, 83) | 145.8 | 82.4 |
| Overall at Month 2 (n=141, 81) | 138.3 | 81.0 |
| Mild/Moderate at Month 2 (n=141, 81) | 138.3 | 81.0 |
| Severe at Month 2 (n=141, 81) | 138.3 | 81.0 |
| Overall at Month 3 (n=135, 81) | 128.8 | 80.4 |
| Mild/Moderate at Month 3 (n=135, 81) | 128.8 | 80.4 |
| Severe at Month 3 (n=135, 81) | 128.8 | 80.4 |
| Overall at Month 4 (n=120, 80) | 117.7 | 79.7 |
| Mild/Moderate at Month 4 (n=120, 80) | 117.7 | 79.7 |
| Severe at Month 4 (n=120, 80) | 117.7 | 79.7 |
| Overall at Month 5 (n=117, 79) | 112.2 | 77.9 |
| Mild/Moderate at Month 5 (n=117, 79) | 112.2 | 77.9 |
| Severe at Month 5 (n=117, 79) | 112.2 | 77.9 |
| Overall at Month 6 (n=109, 77) | 103.5 | 75.7 |
| Mild/Moderate at Month 6 (n=109, 77) | 103.5 | 75.7 |
| Severe at Month 6 (n=109, 77) | 103.5 | 75.7 |
| Overall at Month 7 (n=77, 60) | 12.8 | 6.6 |
| Mild/Moderate at Month 7 (n=77, 60) | 12.8 | 6.6 |
| Severe at Month 7 (n=77, 60) | 12.8 | 6.6 |
| 16. Secondary: | Crude Hypoglycemic Event Rate |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Crude Hypoglycemic Event Rate |
| Measure Description | crude event rate=(events)/(subject-months). Severe=the subject was unable to treat him/herself; had at least 1 neurological symptom; or blood glucose of < = 49 mg/dL. Events not meeting all 3 criteria were considered mild-moderate. Overall=mild, moderate, and severe. |
| Time Frame | Months 1 to 7 |
| Safety Issue | Yes |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety population=all subjects who took at least 1 dose of study drug. Number of subjects with at least 1 hypoglycemic event during the course of the study that were evaluable at the specified month: n=inhaled human insulin, insulin glargine. |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Insulin Glargine | Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Insulin Glargine | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
212 | 190 |
|
Crude Hypoglycemic Event Rate
[units: events / subject-months] |
||
| Overall at Month 1 (n=147, 83) | 1.3 | 0.5 |
| Mild/Moderate at Month 1 (n=147, 83) | 1.3 | 0.5 |
| Severe at Month 1 (n=147, 83) | 0 | 0 |
| Overall at Month 2 (n=141, 81) | 2.6 | 0.8 |
| Mild/Moderate at Month 2 (n=141, 81) | 2.6 | 0.8 |
| Severe at Month 2 (n=141, 81) | 0.7 | 0 |
| Overall at Month 3 (n=135, 81) | 2.3 | 1.0 |
| Mild/Moderate at Month 3 (n=135, 81) | 2.2 | 1.0 |
| Severe at Month 3 (n=135, 81) | 2.3 | 0 |
| Overall at Month 4 (n=120, 80) | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| Mild/Moderate at Month 4 (n=120, 80) | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| Severe at Month 4 (n=120, 80) | 0 | 0 |
| Overall at Month 5 (n=117, 79) | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Mild/Moderate at Month 5 (n=117, 79) | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Severe at Month 5 (n=117, 79) | 0 | 0 |
| Overall at Month 6 (n=109, 77) | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Mild/Moderate at Month 6 (n=109, 77) | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Severe at Month 6 (n=109, 77) | 0 | 0 |
| Overall at Month 7 (n=77, 60) | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| Mild/Moderate at Month 7 (n=77, 60) | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| Severe at Month 7 (n=77, 60) | 0 | 0 |
| 17. Secondary: | Number of Nocturnal Hypoglycemic Events |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Number of Nocturnal Hypoglycemic Events |
| Measure Description | A hypoglycemic event was identified by characteristic symptoms or blood glucose levels. Severe=the subject was unable to treat him/herself; had at least 1 neurological symptom; or blood glucose of < = 49 mg/dL. Events not meeting all 3 criteria were considered mild-moderate. Nocturnal hypoglycemia=event occuring from midnight to 5:59 am. |
| Time Frame | Months 1 to 7 |
| Safety Issue | Yes |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Safety population=all subjects who took at least 1 dose of study drug. |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Insulin Glargine | Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Insulin Glargine | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
212 | 190 |
|
Number of Nocturnal Hypoglycemic Events
[units: events] |
187 | 114 |
| 18. Secondary: | Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26 |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26 |
| Measure Description | Body weight value: Change = value at Week 26 minus value at Baseline. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, Week 26 |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| FAS=all subjects who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline measurement. LOCF imputed missing data with any post-baseline visit. Number of subjects with body weight measurements at Baseline and Week 26: inhaled human insulin n=192, insulin glargine n=183. |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Insulin Glargine | Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Insulin Glargine | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
203 | 189 |
|
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26
[units: kg] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
3.55 ± 4.74 | 2.33 ± 3.80 |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.0055 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | 1.20 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( 0.35 to 2.04 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| 19. Secondary: | Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Week 26 |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Week 26 |
| Measure Description | BMI value (kg/m2): Change = value at Week 26 minus value at Baseline. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, Week 26 |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| FAS=all subjects who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline measurement. LOCF imputed missing data with any post-baseline visit. Number of subjects with BMI measurements at Baseline and Week 26: inhaled human insulin n=192, insulin glargine n=183. |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Insulin Glargine | Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Insulin Glargine | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
203 | 189 |
|
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Week 26
[units: kg/m2] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
1.22 ± 1.66 | 0.80 ± 1.30 |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.0053 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | 0.42 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( 0.12 to 0.71 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| 20. Other Pre-specified: | Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 26 for the FAS |
| Measure Type | Other Pre-specified |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 26 for the FAS |
| Measure Description | HbA1c lab value: Change = value at Week 26 minus value at Baseline. |
| Time Frame | Baseline, Week 26 |
| Safety Issue | No |
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| FAS=all subjects who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline measurement. LOCF imputed missing data with any post-baseline visit. Using the FAS yielded supplemental analyses for the primary efficacy endpoint. |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Insulin Glargine | Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents. |
| Inhaled Human Insulin | Insulin Glargine | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
203 | 189 |
|
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 26 for the FAS
[units: percent] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
-1.91 ± 1.41 | -1.67 ± 1.38 |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Non-Inferiority/Equivalence Test [2] | Yes |
| Method [3] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [4] | <0.0001 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [5] | -0.27 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.47 to -0.08 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| The null hypothesis was that the inhaled human insulin group was inferior to the insulin glargine group with respect to 26-week change from baseline in HbA1c, while the alternate hypothesis is that the inhaled human insulin group was not inferior to the insulin glargine group with respect to 26-week change from baseline in HbA1c, given the predetermined non-inferiority margin of 0.4%. | |
| [2] | Details of power calculation, definition of non-inferiority margin, and other key parameters: |
| The non-inferiority test utilized a one-sided 2.5% level of significance. | |
| [3] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [4] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. | |
| [5] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| A CI approach was presented with a two-sided 95% CI of the difference between treatment and control. |
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.0062 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] | -0.27 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.47 to -0.08 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| With an established non-inferiority claim, an additional test for superiority was conducted (ie, the margin was 0.0%). | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| The superiority test used a one-sided 2.5% level of significance. |
More Information
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. | ||||||
| There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. | ||||||
The agreement is:
|
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| Due to cancellation of the EXUBERA program, the collected Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) data were not summarized, and no statistical analyses were performed. |
| Responsible Party: | Pfizer, Inc. ( Director, Clinical Trial Disclosure Group ) |
| Study ID Numbers: | A2171095 |
| Study First Received: | January 3, 2007 |
| Results First Received: | July 30, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | September 8, 2009 |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00418522 History of Changes |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |