Full Text View
Tabular View
Study Results
Related Studies
This Study Is To Determine If Inhaled Insulin Is Effective In Treating Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
This study has been completed.
Study NCT00418522   Information provided by Pfizer
First Received: January 3, 2007   Last Updated: September 8, 2009   History of Changes
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Randomized, Open Label, Parallel Assignment
Condition: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Interventions: Drug: Insulin glargine
Drug: Inhaled Insulin (Exubera)

  Participant Flow
  Hide Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations
No text entered.

Pre-Assignment Details
Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment
No text entered.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Inhaled Human Insulin Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents.
Insulin Glargine Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents.

Participant Flow:   Overall Study
  Inhaled Human Insulin Insulin Glargine
STARTED   219     194  
      Received Treatment               212                 190  
COMPLETED   136     152  
NOT COMPLETED   83     42  
      Adverse Event               7                 1  
      Lack of Efficacy               1                 3  
      Lost to Follow-up               10                 4  
      Withdrawal by Subject               31                 7  
      Unknown               27                 23  
      Randomized but did not receive treatment               7                 4  



  Baseline Characteristics
  Hide Baseline Characteristics

Reporting Groups
  Description
Inhaled Human Insulin Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents.
Insulin Glargine Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents.

Baseline Measures
  Inhaled Human Insulin Insulin Glargine Total
Number of Participants  
[units: participants]
212 190 402
Age, Customized  
[units: participants]
     
18 to 44 years 27 26 53
45 to 65 years 151 125 276
>=65 years 34 39 73
Gender  
[units: participants]
     
Female 92 84 176
Male 120 106 226



  Outcome Measures
  Hide All Outcome Measures

1.  Primary:   Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 26 for the Per Protocol (PP) Population

Measure Type Primary
Measure Title Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 26 for the Per Protocol (PP) Population
Measure Description HbA1c lab value: Change = value at Week 26 minus value at Baseline.
Time Frame Baseline, Week 26  
Safety Issue No  

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
Per protocol (PP)=Full Analysis Set (FAS) subjects (i.e., had >=1 study drug dose and >=1 post-baseline measurement) with >=12 weeks treatment and no major protocol violation. LOCF imputed missing data with any post-baseline visit. Number of subjects with HbA1c values at Baseline and Week 26: inhaled human insulin n=154, insulin glargine n=157.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Inhaled Human Insulin Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents.
Insulin Glargine Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents.

Measured Values
  Inhaled Human Insulin Insulin Glargine
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants]
154 157
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 26 for the Per Protocol (PP) Population
[units: percent]
Mean ± Standard Deviation
-2.01 ± 1.39 -1.75 ± 1.40


Statistical Analysis 1 for Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 26 for the Per Protocol (PP) Population
Groups [1] All groups
Non-Inferiority/Equivalence Test [2] Yes
Method [3] ANCOVA
P Value [4] <0.0001
Mean Difference (Final Values) [5] -0.19
95% Confidence Interval ( -0.38 to 0 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  The null hypothesis was that the inhaled human insulin group was inferior to the insulin glargine group with respect to 26-week change from baseline in HbA1c, while the alternate hypothesis is that the inhaled human insulin group was not inferior to the insulin glargine group with respect to 26-week change from baseline in HbA1c, given the predetermined non-inferiority margin of 0.4%.
[2] Details of power calculation, definition of non-inferiority margin, and other key parameters:
  The non-inferiority test utilized a one-sided 2.5% level of significance.
[3] Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  No text entered.
[4] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  No text entered.
[5] Other relevant estimation information:
  A confidence interval (CI) approach was presented with a two-sided 95% CI of the difference between treatment and control.

Statistical Analysis 2 for Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 26 for the Per Protocol (PP) Population
Groups [1] All groups
Method [2] ANCOVA
P Value [3] 0.0516
Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] -0.19
95% Confidence Interval ( -0.38 to 0 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  With an established non-inferiority claim, an additional test for superiority was conducted (ie, the margin was 0.0%).
[2] Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  No text entered.
[3] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  No text entered.
[4] Other relevant estimation information:
  The superiority test used a one-sided 2.5% level of significance.



2.  Secondary:   Percentage of Subjects Achieving Glycemic Control (HbA1c < 6.5%) at Week 26

Measure Type Secondary
Measure Title Percentage of Subjects Achieving Glycemic Control (HbA1c < 6.5%) at Week 26
Measure Description Percentage of subjects with glycosylated hemoglobin A1c lab value less than 6.5%.
Time Frame Week 26  
Safety Issue No  

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
FAS=all subjects who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline measurement. LOCF imputed missing data with any post-baseline visit. Number of subjects with HbA1c < 6.5% at Week 26: inhaled human insulin n=72, insulin glargine n=42.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Inhaled Human Insulin Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents.
Insulin Glargine Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents.

Measured Values
  Inhaled Human Insulin Insulin Glargine
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants]
203 189
Percentage of Subjects Achieving Glycemic Control (HbA1c < 6.5%) at Week 26
[units: percentage of participants]
35.5 22.2


Statistical Analysis 1 for Percentage of Subjects Achieving Glycemic Control (HbA1c < 6.5%) at Week 26
Groups [1] All groups
Method [2] Regression, Logistic
P Value [3] 0.0052
Odds Ratio (OR) [4] 1.96
95% Confidence Interval ( 1.22 to 3.14 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  No text entered.
[2] Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  No text entered.
[3] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  No text entered.
[4] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.



3.  Secondary:   Percentage of Subjects Achieving Glycemic Control (HbA1c < 7.0%) at Week 26

Measure Type Secondary
Measure Title Percentage of Subjects Achieving Glycemic Control (HbA1c < 7.0%) at Week 26
Measure Description Percentage of subjects with glycosylated hemoglobin A1c lab value less than 7.0%.
Time Frame Week 26  
Safety Issue No  

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
FAS=all subjects who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline measurement. LOCF imputed missing data with any post-baseline visit. Number of subjects with HbA1c < 7.0% at Week 26: inhaled human insulin n=127, insulin glargine n=90.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Inhaled Human Insulin Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents.
Insulin Glargine Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents.

Measured Values
  Inhaled Human Insulin Insulin Glargine
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants]
203 189
Percentage of Subjects Achieving Glycemic Control (HbA1c < 7.0%) at Week 26
[units: percentage of participants]
62.6 47.6


Statistical Analysis 1 for Percentage of Subjects Achieving Glycemic Control (HbA1c < 7.0%) at Week 26
Groups [1] All groups
Method [2] Regression, Logistic
P Value [3] 0.0022
Odds Ratio (OR) [4] 2.01
95% Confidence Interval ( 1.29 to 3.15 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  No text entered.
[2] Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  No text entered.
[3] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  No text entered.
[4] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.



4.  Secondary:   Percentage of Subjects Achieving Glycemic Control (HbA1c < 8.0%) at Week 26

Measure Type Secondary
Measure Title Percentage of Subjects Achieving Glycemic Control (HbA1c < 8.0%) at Week 26
Measure Description Number of subjects with glycosylated hemoglobin A1c lab value less than 8.0%.
Time Frame Week 26  
Safety Issue No  

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
FAS=all subjects who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline measurement. LOCF imputed missing data with any post-baseline visit. Number of subjects with HbA1c < 8.0% at Week 26: inhaled human insulin n=162, insulin glargine n=158.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Inhaled Human Insulin Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents.
Insulin Glargine Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents.

Measured Values
  Inhaled Human Insulin Insulin Glargine
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants]
203 189
Percentage of Subjects Achieving Glycemic Control (HbA1c < 8.0%) at Week 26
[units: percentage of participants]
79.8 83.6


Statistical Analysis 1 for Percentage of Subjects Achieving Glycemic Control (HbA1c < 8.0%) at Week 26
Groups [1] All groups
Method [2] Regression, Logistic
P Value [3] 0.2480
Odds Ratio (OR) [4] 0.71
95% Confidence Interval ( 0.40 to 1.27 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  No text entered.
[2] Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  No text entered.
[3] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  No text entered.
[4] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.



5.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 26

Measure Type Secondary
Measure Title Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 26
Measure Description Fasting plasma glucose lab value: Change = value at Week 26 minus value at Baseline.
Time Frame Baseline, Week 26  
Safety Issue No  

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
FAS=all subjects who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline measurement. LOCF imputed missing data with any post-baseline visit. Number of subjects with fasting plasma glucose at Baseline and Week 26: inhaled human insulin n=202, insulin glargine n=189.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Inhaled Human Insulin Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents.
Insulin Glargine Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents.

Measured Values
  Inhaled Human Insulin Insulin Glargine
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants]
203 189
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 26
[units: mg/dL]
Mean ± Standard Deviation
-52.77 ± 69.48 -53.50 ± 62.92


Statistical Analysis 1 for Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 26
Groups [1] All groups
Method [2] ANCOVA
P Value [3] 0.6091
Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] 2.57
95% Confidence Interval ( -7.31 to 12.46 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  No text entered.
[2] Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  No text entered.
[3] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  No text entered.
[4] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.



6.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in Fasting and Postprandial Blood Glucose as Determined by Standardized Meal Tolerance Tests at Week 26

Measure Type Secondary
Measure Title Change From Baseline in Fasting and Postprandial Blood Glucose as Determined by Standardized Meal Tolerance Tests at Week 26
Measure Description Postprandial blood glucose lab value (Time 0 min [fasting], Time 30 min, Time 60 min, Time 90 min, Time 120 min, Time 180 min): Change = value at Week 26 minus value at Baseline.
Time Frame Baseline, Week 26  
Safety Issue No  

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
FAS=all subjects who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline measurement. LOCF imputed missing data with any post-baseline visit. Number of subjects with fasting and postprandial blood glucose measurements determined by standardized meal tolerance tests at Baseline and Week 26: n=inhaled human insulin, insulin glargine.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Inhaled Human Insulin Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents.
Insulin Glargine Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents.

Measured Values
  Inhaled Human Insulin Insulin Glargine
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants]
203 189
Change From Baseline in Fasting and Postprandial Blood Glucose as Determined by Standardized Meal Tolerance Tests at Week 26
[units: mg/dL]
Mean ± Standard Deviation
   
Time 0 at Week 26 (n=105, 119) -35.22 ± 51.12 -61.16 ± 54.68
Time 30 at Week 26 (n=95, 107) -49.91 ± 62.41 -66.02 ± 62.32
Time 60 at Week 26 (n=110, 118) -56.83 ± 69.81 -64.77 ± 64.47
Time 90 at Week 26 (n=114, 120) -64.94 ± 75.67 -58.85 ± 64.58
Time 120 at Week 26 (n=113, 124) -66.59 ± 74.69 -54.89 ± 63.02
Time 180 at Week 26 (n=114, 122) -66.99 ± 74.19 -51.27 ± 59.92


Statistical Analysis 1 for Change From Baseline in Fasting and Postprandial Blood Glucose as Determined by Standardized Meal Tolerance Tests at Week 26
Groups [1] All groups
Method [2] ANCOVA
P Value [3] <0.0001
Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] 32.96
95% Confidence Interval ( 22.66 to 43.25 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  Time 0 (fasting) at Week 26.
[2] Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  No text entered.
[3] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  No text entered.
[4] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 2 for Change From Baseline in Fasting and Postprandial Blood Glucose as Determined by Standardized Meal Tolerance Tests at Week 26
Groups [1] All groups
Method [2] ANCOVA
P Value [3] <0.0001
Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] 28.57
95% Confidence Interval ( 16.55 to 40.59 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  Time 30 at Week 26.
[2] Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  No text entered.
[3] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  No text entered.
[4] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 3 for Change From Baseline in Fasting and Postprandial Blood Glucose as Determined by Standardized Meal Tolerance Tests at Week 26
Groups [1] All groups
Method [2] ANCOVA
P Value [3] 0.0044
Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] 18.96
95% Confidence Interval ( 5.96 to 31.96 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  Time 60 at Week 26.
[2] Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  No text entered.
[3] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  No text entered.
[4] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 4 for Change From Baseline in Fasting and Postprandial Blood Glucose as Determined by Standardized Meal Tolerance Tests at Week 26
Groups [1] All groups
Method [2] ANCOVA
P Value [3] 0.3168
Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] 6.69
95% Confidence Interval ( -6.45 to 19.83 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  Time 90 at Week 26.
[2] Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  No text entered.
[3] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  No text entered.
[4] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 5 for Change From Baseline in Fasting and Postprandial Blood Glucose as Determined by Standardized Meal Tolerance Tests at Week 26
Groups [1] All groups
Method [2] ANCOVA
P Value [3] 0.9222
Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] 0.63
95% Confidence Interval ( -12.12 to 13.39 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  Time 120 at Week 26.
[2] Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  No text entered.
[3] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  No text entered.
[4] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 6 for Change From Baseline in Fasting and Postprandial Blood Glucose as Determined by Standardized Meal Tolerance Tests at Week 26
Groups [1] All groups
Method [2] ANCOVA
P Value [3] 0.6950
Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] -2.41
95% Confidence Interval ( -14.51 to 9.69 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  Time 180 at Week 26.
[2] Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  No text entered.
[3] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  No text entered.
[4] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.



7.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in Postprandial Blood Glucose as Measured by 8-Point Profiles at Week 26

Measure Type Secondary
Measure Title Change From Baseline in Postprandial Blood Glucose as Measured by 8-Point Profiles at Week 26
Measure Description Post-prandial=after a meal. 8-point scale: (1 = before breakfast, 2 = 2 hours post breakfast, 3 = before lunch, 4 = 2 hours post lunch, 5 = before dinner, 6 = 2 hours post dinner, 7 = at bedtime, 8 = overnight [between 2 and 4 am]). Postprandial blood glucose lab value: Change = value at Week 26 minus value at Baseline.
Time Frame Baseline, Week 26  
Safety Issue No  

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
FAS = all subjects who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline measurement. LOCF imputed missing data with any post-baseline visit. Number of subjects with postprandial blood glucose measurements as measured by 8-point profiles at Baseline and Week 26: n=inhaled human insulin, insulin glargine.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Inhaled Human Insulin Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents.
Insulin Glargine Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents.

Measured Values
  Inhaled Human Insulin Insulin Glargine
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants]
203 189
Change From Baseline in Postprandial Blood Glucose as Measured by 8-Point Profiles at Week 26
[units: mg/dL]
Mean ± Standard Deviation
   
Post-Breakfast, Week 26 (n=185,171) -86.61 ± 85.98 -75.36 ± 79.04
Post-Lunch, Week 26 (n=184, 172) -86.66 ± 77.49 -58.51 ± 86.93
Post-Dinner, Week 26 (n=187,166) -81.86 ± 75.94 -59.20 ± 86.21


Statistical Analysis 1 for Change From Baseline in Postprandial Blood Glucose as Measured by 8-Point Profiles at Week 26
Groups [1] All groups
Method [2] ANCOVA
P Value [3] 0.1207
Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] -9.61
95% Confidence Interval ( -21.76 to 2.54 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  Post-Breakfast, Week 26.
[2] Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  No text entered.
[3] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  No text entered.
[4] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 2 for Change From Baseline in Postprandial Blood Glucose as Measured by 8-Point Profiles at Week 26
Groups [1] All groups
Method [2] ANCOVA
P Value [3] <0.0001
Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] -29.11
95% Confidence Interval ( -39.77 to -18.44 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  Post-Lunch, Week 26.
[2] Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  No text entered.
[3] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  No text entered.
[4] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 3 for Change From Baseline in Postprandial Blood Glucose as Measured by 8-Point Profiles at Week 26
Groups [1] All groups
Method [2] ANCOVA
P Value [3] <0.0001
Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] -33.76
95% Confidence Interval ( -44.17 to -23.35 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  Post-Dinner, Week 26.
[2] Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  No text entered.
[3] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  No text entered.
[4] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.



8.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in Lipids at Week 26

Measure Type Secondary
Measure Title Change From Baseline in Lipids at Week 26
Measure Description Lipid (total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-c], low density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-c], triglycerides) lab value: Change = value at Week 26 minus value at Baseline.
Time Frame Baseline, Week 26  
Safety Issue No  

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
FAS=all subjects who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline measurement. LOCF imputed missing data with any post-baseline visit. Number of subjects with lipids data at Baseline and Week 26: n=inhaled human insulin, insulin glargine.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Inhaled Human Insulin Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents.
Insulin Glargine Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents.

Measured Values
  Inhaled Human Insulin Insulin Glargine
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants]
203 189
Change From Baseline in Lipids at Week 26
[units: mg/dL]
Mean ± Standard Deviation
   
Total cholesterol, Week 26 (n=197, 186) -2.80 ± 31.97 -6.19 ± 29.95
HDL-c, Week 26 (n=197, 186) 2.97 ± 6.99 0.69 ± 6.07
LDL-c, Week 26 (n=197, 186) -2.09 ± 25.74 -3.71 ± 23.63
Triglycerides, Week 26 (n=197, 187) -42.65 ± 87.70 -46.23 ± 147.8


Statistical Analysis 1 for Change From Baseline in Lipids at Week 26
Groups [1] All groups
Method [2] ANCOVA
P Value [3] 0.0735
Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] 5.21
95% Confidence Interval ( -0.50 to 10.91 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  Total Cholesterol at Week 26.
[2] Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  No text entered.
[3] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  No text entered.
[4] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 2 for Change From Baseline in Lipids at Week 26
Groups [1] All groups
Method [2] ANCOVA
P Value [3] 0.0017
Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] 2.09
95% Confidence Interval ( 0.79 to 3.39 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  HDL-c at Week 26.
[2] Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  No text entered.
[3] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  No text entered.
[4] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 3 for Change From Baseline in Lipids at Week 26
Groups [1] All groups
Method [2] ANCOVA
P Value [3] 0.1369
Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] 3.43
95% Confidence Interval ( -1.10 to 7.96 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  LDL-c at Week 26.
[2] Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  No text entered.
[3] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  No text entered.
[4] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 4 for Change From Baseline in Lipids at Week 26
Groups [1] All groups
Method [2] ANCOVA
P Value [3] 0.5684
Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] 4.26
95% Confidence Interval ( -10.40 to 18.92 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  Triglycerides at Week 26.
[2] Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  No text entered.
[3] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  No text entered.
[4] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.



9.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in Cardiovascular (CV) Biomarkers High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP), Leptin, and Spot Urine Microalbumin at Week 26

Measure Type Secondary
Measure Title Change From Baseline in Cardiovascular (CV) Biomarkers High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP), Leptin, and Spot Urine Microalbumin at Week 26
Measure Description CV biomarker (hs-CRP, Leptin, and Spot Urine Microalbumin) lab value: Change = value at Week 26 minus value at Baseline.
Time Frame Baseline, Week 26  
Safety Issue No  

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
FAS=all subjects who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline measurement. LOCF imputed missing data with any post-baseline visit. Number of subjects with CV biomarker data (hs-CRP, leptin, and spot urine microalbumin) at Baseline and Week 26: n=inhaled human insulin, insulin glargine.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Inhaled Human Insulin Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents.
Insulin Glargine Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents.

Measured Values
  Inhaled Human Insulin Insulin Glargine
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants]
203 189
Change From Baseline in Cardiovascular (CV) Biomarkers High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP), Leptin, and Spot Urine Microalbumin at Week 26
[units: mg/L]
Mean ± Standard Deviation
   
hs-CRP, Week 26 (n=198, 187) 0.61 ± 4.56 0.32 ± 3.69
Leptin, Week 26 (n=193, 186) 3.68 ± 13.50 4.41 ± 10.50
Spot Urine Microalbumin, Week 26 (n=183, 169) 3.47 ± 96.48 3.70 ± 54.53


Statistical Analysis 1 for Change From Baseline in Cardiovascular (CV) Biomarkers High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP), Leptin, and Spot Urine Microalbumin at Week 26
Groups [1] All groups
Method [2] ANCOVA
P Value [3] 0.5673
Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] 0.24
95% Confidence Interval ( -0.58 to 1.06 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  hs-CRP at Week 26.
[2] Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  No text entered.
[3] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  No text entered.
[4] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 2 for Change From Baseline in Cardiovascular (CV) Biomarkers High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP), Leptin, and Spot Urine Microalbumin at Week 26
Groups [1] All groups
Method [2] ANCOVA
P Value [3] 0.6099
Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] -0.61
95% Confidence Interval ( -2.97 to 1.75 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  Leptin at Week 26.
[2] Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  No text entered.
[3] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  No text entered.
[4] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 3 for Change From Baseline in Cardiovascular (CV) Biomarkers High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP), Leptin, and Spot Urine Microalbumin at Week 26
Groups [1] All groups
Method [2] ANCOVA
P Value [3] 0.7684
Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] 2.28
95% Confidence Interval ( -12.94 to 17.51 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  Spot urine microalbumin at Week 26.
[2] Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  No text entered.
[3] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  No text entered.
[4] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.



10.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in CV Biomarkers Adiponectin and Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) at Week 26

Measure Type Secondary
Measure Title Change From Baseline in CV Biomarkers Adiponectin and Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) at Week 26
Measure Description CV biomarker (adiponectin and ApoB) lab value: Change = value at Week 26 minus value at Baseline.
Time Frame Baseline, Week 26  
Safety Issue No  

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
FAS=all subjects who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline measurement. LOCF imputed missing data with any post-baseline visit. Number of subjects with CV biomarker data (adiponectin and ApoB) at Baseline and Week 26: n=inhaled human insulin, insulin glargine.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Inhaled Human Insulin Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents.
Insulin Glargine Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents.

Measured Values
  Inhaled Human Insulin Insulin Glargine
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants]
203 189
Change From Baseline in CV Biomarkers Adiponectin and Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) at Week 26
[units: mg/mL]
Mean ± Standard Deviation
   
Adiponectin, Week 26 (n=195, 184) 0.23 ± 5.58 -0.32 ± 5.15
ApoB, Week 26 (n=198, 187) -0.06 ± 0.19 -0.06 ± 0.17


Statistical Analysis 1 for Change From Baseline in CV Biomarkers Adiponectin and Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) at Week 26
Groups [1] All groups
Method [2] ANCOVA
P Value [3] 0.5005
Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] 0.36
95% Confidence Interval ( -0.69 to 1.42 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  Adiponectin at Week 26.
[2] Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  No text entered.
[3] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  No text entered.
[4] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.

Statistical Analysis 2 for Change From Baseline in CV Biomarkers Adiponectin and Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) at Week 26
Groups [1] All groups
Method [2] ANCOVA
P Value [3] 0.6850
Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] 0.01
95% Confidence Interval ( -0.03 to 0.04 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  ApoB at Week 26.
[2] Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  No text entered.
[3] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  No text entered.
[4] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.



11.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (CGMS) Glucose Values at Week 26

Measure Type Secondary
Measure Title Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (CGMS) Glucose Values at Week 26
Measure Description 24-Hour CGMS glucose lab value was obtained using the Medtronic MiniMed CGMS. Not all subjects were offered the opportunity to participate in this assessment. Change = value at Week 26 minus value at Baseline.
Time Frame Baseline, Week 26  
Safety Issue No  

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
FAS-CGMS=all subjects with at least 1 study drug dose, at least 1 post-baseline measurement, and who participated in a 24-hour CGMS substudy. LOCF imputed missing data with any post-baseline visit. Number of subjects who participated in the substudy with 24-hour CGMS values at Baseline and Week 26: inhaled human insulin n=2, insulin glargine n=8.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Inhaled Human Insulin Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents.
Insulin Glargine Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents.

Measured Values
  Inhaled Human Insulin Insulin Glargine
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants]
203 189
Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (CGMS) Glucose Values at Week 26
[units: mg/dL]
Mean ± Standard Deviation
-36.53 ± 33.96 -35.63 ± 58.19


Statistical Analysis 1 for Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (CGMS) Glucose Values at Week 26
Groups [1] All groups
Method [2] ANCOVA
P Value [3] 0.1856
Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] 58.70
95% Confidence Interval ( -43.37 to 160.77 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  No text entered.
[2] Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  No text entered.
[3] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  No text entered.
[4] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.



12.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in Mean Standard Deviation (SD) of 24-Hour Glucose Values Measured by CGMS at Week 26

Measure Type Secondary
Measure Title Change From Baseline in Mean Standard Deviation (SD) of 24-Hour Glucose Values Measured by CGMS at Week 26
Measure Description SD of 24-Hour CGMS glucose lab value obtained using the Medtronic MiniMed CGMS. Not all subjects were offered the opportunity to participate in this assessment. Change = value at Week 26 minus value at Baseline.
Time Frame Baseline, Week 26  
Safety Issue No  

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
FAS-CGMS=all subjects with at least 1 study drug dose, at least 1 post-baseline measurement, and who participated in a 24-hour CGMS substudy. LOCF imputed missing data with any post-baseline visit. Number of subjects who participated in the substudy with 24-hour CGMS values at Baseline and Week 26: inhaled human insulin n=2, insulin glargine n=8.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Inhaled Human Insulin Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents.
Insulin Glargine Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents.

Measured Values
  Inhaled Human Insulin Insulin Glargine
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants]
203 189
Change From Baseline in Mean Standard Deviation (SD) of 24-Hour Glucose Values Measured by CGMS at Week 26
[units: mg/dL]
Mean ± Standard Deviation
-12.50 ± 2.55 4.46 ± 11.51


Statistical Analysis 1 for Change From Baseline in Mean Standard Deviation (SD) of 24-Hour Glucose Values Measured by CGMS at Week 26
Groups [1] All groups
Method [2] ANCOVA
P Value [3] 0.1862
Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] -18.72
95% Confidence Interval ( -51.34 to 13.89 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  No text entered.
[2] Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  No text entered.
[3] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  No text entered.
[4] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.



13.  Secondary:   Number of Subjects With Hypoglycemic Events

Measure Type Secondary
Measure Title Number of Subjects With Hypoglycemic Events
Measure Description A hypoglycemic event was identified by characteristic symptoms or blood glucose levels. An event was severe if the subject was unable to treat him/herself; had at least 1 neurological symptom; or blood glucose of < = 49 mg/dL. Events not meeting all 3 criteria were considered mild-moderate. Overall=mild, moderate, and severe.
Time Frame Months 1 to 7  
Safety Issue Yes  

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
Safety population=all subjects who took at least 1 dose of study drug. Number of subjects with at least 1 hypoglycemic event during the course of the study that were evaluable at the specified month: n=inhaled human insulin, insulin glargine.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Inhaled Human Insulin Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents.
Insulin Glargine Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents.

Measured Values
  Inhaled Human Insulin Insulin Glargine
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants]
212 190
Number of Subjects With Hypoglycemic Events
[units: participants]
   
Overall at Month 1 (n=147, 83) 70 24
Mild/Moderate at Month 1 (n=147, 83) 69 24
Severe at Month 1 (n=147, 83) 0 0
Overall at Month 2 (n=141, 81) 98 38
Mild/Moderate at Month 2 (n=141, 81) 98 38
Severe at Month 2 (n=141, 81) 1 0
Overall at Month 3 (n=135, 81) 84 35
Mild/Moderate at Month 3 (n=135, 81) 83 35
Severe at Month 3 (n=135, 81) 3 0
Overall at Month 4 (n=120, 80) 61 25
Mild/Moderate at Month 4 (n=120, 80) 61 25
Severe at Month 4 (n=120, 80) 0 0
Overall at Month 5 (n=117, 79) 55 30
Mild/Moderate at Month 5 (n=117, 79) 55 30
Severe at Month 5 (n=117, 79) 0 0
Overall at Month 6 (n=109, 77) 42 31
Mild/Moderate at Month 6 (n=109, 77) 42 31
Severe at Month 6 (n=109, 77) 0 0
Overall at Month 7 (n=77, 60) 8 4
Mild/Moderate at Month 7 (n=77, 60) 8 4
Severe at Month 7 (n=77, 60) 0 0

No statistical analysis provided for Number of Subjects With Hypoglycemic Events



14.  Secondary:   Number of Total Hypoglycemic Events

Measure Type Secondary
Measure Title Number of Total Hypoglycemic Events
Measure Description A hypoglycemic event was identified by characteristic symptoms or blood glucose levels. Severe=the subject was unable to treat him/herself; had at least 1 neurological symptom; or blood glucose of < = 49 mg/dL. Events not meeting all 3 criteria were considered mild-moderate. Overall=mild, moderate, and severe. Total=events during the study.
Time Frame Months 1 to 7  
Safety Issue Yes  

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
Safety population=all subjects who took at least 1 dose of study drug. Number of subjects with at least 1 hypoglycemic event during the course of the study that were evaluable at the specified month: n=inhaled human insulin, insulin glargine.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Inhaled Human Insulin Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents.
Insulin Glargine Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents.

Measured Values
  Inhaled Human Insulin Insulin Glargine
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants]
212 190
Number of Total Hypoglycemic Events
[units: events]
   
Overall at Month 1 (n=147, 83) 195 41
Mild/Moderate at Month 1 (n=147, 83) 194 41
Severe at Month 1 (n=147, 83) 0 0
Overall at Month 2 (n=141, 81) 365 66
Mild/Moderate at Month 2 (n=141, 81) 364 66
Severe at Month 2 (n=141, 81) 1 0
Overall at Month 3 (n=135, 81) 292 84
Mild/Moderate at Month 3 (n=135, 81) 289 84
Severe at Month 3 (n=135, 81) 3 0
Overall at Month 4 (n=120, 80) 166 51
Mild/Moderate at Month 4 (n=120, 80) 166 51
Severe at Month 4 (n=120, 80) 0 0
Overall at Month 5 (n=117, 79) 157 64
Mild/Moderate at Month 5 (n=117, 79) 157 64
Severe at Month 5 (n=117, 79) 0 0
Overall at Month 6 (n=109, 77) 119 63
Mild/Moderate at Month 6 (n=109, 77) 119 63
Severe at Month 6 (n=109, 77) 0 0
Overall at Month 7 (n=77, 60) 12 5
Mild/Moderate at Month 7 (n=77, 60) 12 5
Severe at Month 7 (n=77, 60) 0 0

No statistical analysis provided for Number of Total Hypoglycemic Events



15.  Secondary:   Number of Total Subject Months of Treatment

Measure Type Secondary
Measure Title Number of Total Subject Months of Treatment
Measure Description Number of total subject months of treatment. Subject months = number of days from start of treatment to the last day of active treatment + 1 day lag, including off-drug time)/30.44. Severe=the subject was unable to treat him/herself; had at least 1 neurological symptom; or blood glucose of < = 49 mg/dL. Events not meeting all 3 criteria were considered mild-moderate. Overall=mild, moderate, and severe.
Time Frame Months 1 to 7  
Safety Issue Yes  

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
Safety population=all subjects who took at least 1 dose of study drug. Number of subjects with at least 1 hypoglycemic event during the course of the study that were evaluable at the specified month: n=inhaled human insulin, insulin glargine.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Inhaled Human Insulin Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents.
Insulin Glargine Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents.

Measured Values
  Inhaled Human Insulin Insulin Glargine
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants]
212 190
Number of Total Subject Months of Treatment
[units: subject months]
   
Overall at Month 1 (n=147, 83) 145.8 82.4
Mild/Moderate at Month 1 (n=147, 83) 145.8 82.4
Severe at Month 1 (n=147, 83) 145.8 82.4
Overall at Month 2 (n=141, 81) 138.3 81.0
Mild/Moderate at Month 2 (n=141, 81) 138.3 81.0
Severe at Month 2 (n=141, 81) 138.3 81.0
Overall at Month 3 (n=135, 81) 128.8 80.4
Mild/Moderate at Month 3 (n=135, 81) 128.8 80.4
Severe at Month 3 (n=135, 81) 128.8 80.4
Overall at Month 4 (n=120, 80) 117.7 79.7
Mild/Moderate at Month 4 (n=120, 80) 117.7 79.7
Severe at Month 4 (n=120, 80) 117.7 79.7
Overall at Month 5 (n=117, 79) 112.2 77.9
Mild/Moderate at Month 5 (n=117, 79) 112.2 77.9
Severe at Month 5 (n=117, 79) 112.2 77.9
Overall at Month 6 (n=109, 77) 103.5 75.7
Mild/Moderate at Month 6 (n=109, 77) 103.5 75.7
Severe at Month 6 (n=109, 77) 103.5 75.7
Overall at Month 7 (n=77, 60) 12.8 6.6
Mild/Moderate at Month 7 (n=77, 60) 12.8 6.6
Severe at Month 7 (n=77, 60) 12.8 6.6

No statistical analysis provided for Number of Total Subject Months of Treatment



16.  Secondary:   Crude Hypoglycemic Event Rate

Measure Type Secondary
Measure Title Crude Hypoglycemic Event Rate
Measure Description crude event rate=(events)/(subject-months). Severe=the subject was unable to treat him/herself; had at least 1 neurological symptom; or blood glucose of < = 49 mg/dL. Events not meeting all 3 criteria were considered mild-moderate. Overall=mild, moderate, and severe.
Time Frame Months 1 to 7  
Safety Issue Yes  

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
Safety population=all subjects who took at least 1 dose of study drug. Number of subjects with at least 1 hypoglycemic event during the course of the study that were evaluable at the specified month: n=inhaled human insulin, insulin glargine.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Inhaled Human Insulin Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents.
Insulin Glargine Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents.

Measured Values
  Inhaled Human Insulin Insulin Glargine
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants]
212 190
Crude Hypoglycemic Event Rate
[units: events / subject-months]
   
Overall at Month 1 (n=147, 83) 1.3 0.5
Mild/Moderate at Month 1 (n=147, 83) 1.3 0.5
Severe at Month 1 (n=147, 83) 0 0
Overall at Month 2 (n=141, 81) 2.6 0.8
Mild/Moderate at Month 2 (n=141, 81) 2.6 0.8
Severe at Month 2 (n=141, 81) 0.7 0
Overall at Month 3 (n=135, 81) 2.3 1.0
Mild/Moderate at Month 3 (n=135, 81) 2.2 1.0
Severe at Month 3 (n=135, 81) 2.3 0
Overall at Month 4 (n=120, 80) 1.4 0.6
Mild/Moderate at Month 4 (n=120, 80) 1.4 0.6
Severe at Month 4 (n=120, 80) 0 0
Overall at Month 5 (n=117, 79) 1.4 0.8
Mild/Moderate at Month 5 (n=117, 79) 1.4 0.8
Severe at Month 5 (n=117, 79) 0 0
Overall at Month 6 (n=109, 77) 1.2 0.8
Mild/Moderate at Month 6 (n=109, 77) 1.2 0.8
Severe at Month 6 (n=109, 77) 0 0
Overall at Month 7 (n=77, 60) 0.9 0.8
Mild/Moderate at Month 7 (n=77, 60) 0.9 0.8
Severe at Month 7 (n=77, 60) 0 0

No statistical analysis provided for Crude Hypoglycemic Event Rate



17.  Secondary:   Number of Nocturnal Hypoglycemic Events

Measure Type Secondary
Measure Title Number of Nocturnal Hypoglycemic Events
Measure Description A hypoglycemic event was identified by characteristic symptoms or blood glucose levels. Severe=the subject was unable to treat him/herself; had at least 1 neurological symptom; or blood glucose of < = 49 mg/dL. Events not meeting all 3 criteria were considered mild-moderate. Nocturnal hypoglycemia=event occuring from midnight to 5:59 am.
Time Frame Months 1 to 7  
Safety Issue Yes  

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
Safety population=all subjects who took at least 1 dose of study drug.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Inhaled Human Insulin Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents.
Insulin Glargine Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents.

Measured Values
  Inhaled Human Insulin Insulin Glargine
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants]
212 190
Number of Nocturnal Hypoglycemic Events
[units: events]
187 114

No statistical analysis provided for Number of Nocturnal Hypoglycemic Events



18.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26

Measure Type Secondary
Measure Title Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26
Measure Description Body weight value: Change = value at Week 26 minus value at Baseline.
Time Frame Baseline, Week 26  
Safety Issue No  

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
FAS=all subjects who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline measurement. LOCF imputed missing data with any post-baseline visit. Number of subjects with body weight measurements at Baseline and Week 26: inhaled human insulin n=192, insulin glargine n=183.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Inhaled Human Insulin Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents.
Insulin Glargine Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents.

Measured Values
  Inhaled Human Insulin Insulin Glargine
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants]
203 189
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26
[units: kg]
Mean ± Standard Deviation
3.55 ± 4.74 2.33 ± 3.80


Statistical Analysis 1 for Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26
Groups [1] All groups
Method [2] ANCOVA
P Value [3] 0.0055
Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] 1.20
95% Confidence Interval ( 0.35 to 2.04 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  No text entered.
[2] Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  No text entered.
[3] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  No text entered.
[4] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.



19.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Week 26

Measure Type Secondary
Measure Title Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Week 26
Measure Description BMI value (kg/m2): Change = value at Week 26 minus value at Baseline.
Time Frame Baseline, Week 26  
Safety Issue No  

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
FAS=all subjects who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline measurement. LOCF imputed missing data with any post-baseline visit. Number of subjects with BMI measurements at Baseline and Week 26: inhaled human insulin n=192, insulin glargine n=183.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Inhaled Human Insulin Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents.
Insulin Glargine Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents.

Measured Values
  Inhaled Human Insulin Insulin Glargine
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants]
203 189
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Week 26
[units: kg/m2]
Mean ± Standard Deviation
1.22 ± 1.66 0.80 ± 1.30


Statistical Analysis 1 for Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Week 26
Groups [1] All groups
Method [2] ANCOVA
P Value [3] 0.0053
Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] 0.42
95% Confidence Interval ( 0.12 to 0.71 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  No text entered.
[2] Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  No text entered.
[3] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  No text entered.
[4] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.



20.  Other Pre-specified:   Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 26 for the FAS

Measure Type Other Pre-specified
Measure Title Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 26 for the FAS
Measure Description HbA1c lab value: Change = value at Week 26 minus value at Baseline.
Time Frame Baseline, Week 26  
Safety Issue No  

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
FAS=all subjects who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline measurement. LOCF imputed missing data with any post-baseline visit. Using the FAS yielded supplemental analyses for the primary efficacy endpoint.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Inhaled Human Insulin Initiation dose of 1 milligram per meal, and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the 6 month study, in addition to oral agents.
Insulin Glargine Insulin glargine, label instruction initiation dose (10 units), and individually adjusted doses, per subject's blood glucose, over the six months study, in addition to oral agents.

Measured Values
  Inhaled Human Insulin Insulin Glargine
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants]
203 189
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 26 for the FAS
[units: percent]
Mean ± Standard Deviation
-1.91 ± 1.41 -1.67 ± 1.38


Statistical Analysis 1 for Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 26 for the FAS
Groups [1] All groups
Non-Inferiority/Equivalence Test [2] Yes
Method [3] ANCOVA
P Value [4] <0.0001
Mean Difference (Final Values) [5] -0.27
95% Confidence Interval ( -0.47 to -0.08 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  The null hypothesis was that the inhaled human insulin group was inferior to the insulin glargine group with respect to 26-week change from baseline in HbA1c, while the alternate hypothesis is that the inhaled human insulin group was not inferior to the insulin glargine group with respect to 26-week change from baseline in HbA1c, given the predetermined non-inferiority margin of 0.4%.
[2] Details of power calculation, definition of non-inferiority margin, and other key parameters:
  The non-inferiority test utilized a one-sided 2.5% level of significance.
[3] Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  No text entered.
[4] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  No text entered.
[5] Other relevant estimation information:
  A CI approach was presented with a two-sided 95% CI of the difference between treatment and control.

Statistical Analysis 2 for Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 26 for the FAS
Groups [1] All groups
Method [2] ANCOVA
P Value [3] 0.0062
Mean Difference (Final Values) [4] -0.27
95% Confidence Interval ( -0.47 to -0.08 )
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  With an established non-inferiority claim, an additional test for superiority was conducted (ie, the margin was 0.0%).
[2] Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  No text entered.
[3] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  No text entered.
[4] Other relevant estimation information:
  The superiority test used a one-sided 2.5% level of significance.




  Serious Adverse Events
  Show Serious Adverse Events


  Other Adverse Events
  Show Other Adverse Events


  More Information
  Hide More Information

Certain Agreements:  
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
The agreement is:
unchecked The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 60 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.
unchecked The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is more than 60 days but less than or equal to 180 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.


Limitations and Caveats
Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data
Due to cancellation of the EXUBERA program, the collected Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) data were not summarized, and no statistical analyses were performed.  


Results Point of Contact:  
Name/Title: Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center
Organization: Pfizer, Inc.
phone: 1-800-718-1021
e-mail: ClinicalTrials.govCallCenter@pfizer.com


No publications provided


Responsible Party: Pfizer, Inc. ( Director, Clinical Trial Disclosure Group )
Study ID Numbers: A2171095
Study First Received: January 3, 2007
Results First Received: July 30, 2009
Last Updated: September 8, 2009
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00418522     History of Changes
Health Authority: United States: Food and Drug Administration