Effectiveness of Pacemaker With Closed Loop Stimulation Compared to Pacemakers With and Without Standard Rate Response - Study Results

Effectiveness of Pacemaker With Closed Loop Stimulation Compared to Pacemakers With and Without Standard Rate Response (CLEAR)

This study has been completed.

Study NCT00355797 Information provided by Biotronik, Inc.

First Received on July 21, 2006. Last Updated on July 22, 2011 History of Changes

Results First Received: June 6, 2011

Study Type:	Interventional
Study Design:	Allocation: Randomized; Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Single Blind (Subject); Primary Purpose: Treatment
Condition:	Bradycardia
Interventions:	Device: Cylos pacemaker programmed to Closed Loop Stimulation (CLS) rate adaptive pacing Device: Cylos pacemaker programmed to standard rate adaptive (R) pacing Device: Cylos pacemaker programmed to non-rate adaptive (DDD) pacing

Participant Flow

Hide Participant Flow

Recruitment Details

Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations
No text entered.

Pre-Assignment Details

Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment
No text entered.

Reporting Groups

	Description
CLS Rate Adaptive Pacing	Pacemaker programmed with Closed Loop Stimulation (CLS) rate adaptive technology for long-term study follow-up.
Standard Rate Adaptive Pacing	Pacemaker programmed with standard rate adaptive technology (R, accelerometer) for long-term study follow-up.
No Rate Adaptive Pacing	Pacemaker programmed with no rate adaption (DDD) for long-term study follow-up.

Participant Flow: Overall Study

	CLS Rate Adaptive Pacing	Standard Rate Adaptive Pacing	No Rate Adaptive Pacing
STARTED	741	369	381
COMPLETED	501	221	239
NOT COMPLETED	240	148	142

Baseline Characteristics

Hide Baseline Characteristics

Reporting Groups

	Description
CLS Rate Adaptive Pacing	Pacemaker programmed with Closed Loop Stimulation (CLS) rate adaptive technology for long-term study follow-up.
Standard Rate Adaptive Pacing	Pacemaker programmed with standard rate adaptive technology (R, accelerometer) for long-term study follow-up.
No Rate Adaptive Pacing	Pacemaker programmed with no rate adaption (DDD) for long-term study follow-up.

Baseline Measures

	CLS Rate Adaptive Pacing	Standard Rate Adaptive Pacing	No Rate Adaptive Pacing	Total
Number of Participants [units: participants]	741	369	381	1491
Age [units: years] Mean ± Standard Deviation	73.5 ± 11.7	72.5 ± 12.0	72.7 ± 12.4	73.1 ± 12.0
Gender [units: participants]
Female	308	178	190	676
Male	433	191	191	815

Outcome Measures

Show All Outcome Measures

1. Primary:

Performance of Activities of Daily Living Tests (6-minute Walk and Sweep) [ Time Frame: within 45 days of enrollment ]

Show Outcome Measure 1

2. Primary:

Pulse Pressure During Activities of Daily Living Tests (Orthostatic Test) [ Time Frame: within 45 days of enrollment ]

Show Outcome Measure 2

3. Secondary:

Change in Quality of Life [ Time Frame: baseline and 12 months ]

Show Outcome Measure 3

4. Secondary:

Mode Reprogramming [ Time Frame: 12 months ]

Show Outcome Measure 4

5. Secondary:

Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Burden [ Time Frame: 12 months ]

Show Outcome Measure 5

6. Secondary:

Cardiac Symptoms [ Time Frame: 12 months ]

Show Outcome Measure 6

7. Secondary:

Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class [ Time Frame: baseline and 12 months ]

Show Outcome Measure 7

8. Secondary:

Change in 6-minute Walk Test Distance [ Time Frame: baseline and 12 months ]

Show Outcome Measure 8

Serious Adverse Events

Show Serious Adverse Events

Other Adverse Events

Show Other Adverse Events

More Information

Hide More Information

Certain Agreements:

Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

The agreement is:

	The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 60 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.
	The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is more than 60 days but less than or equal to 180 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.
	Other disclosure agreement that restricts the right of the PI to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

Limitations and Caveats

Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data
No text entered.

Results Point of Contact:

Name/Title: CLEAR Study CSE
Organization: BIOTRONIK, Inc.
phone: 503-451-8051

No publications provided

Responsible Party:	Crystal Miller, Clinical Studies Engineer I, Biotronik, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:	NCT00355797 History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers:	20060536
Study First Received:	July 21, 2006
Results First Received:	June 6, 2011
Last Updated:	July 22, 2011
Health Authority:	United States: Institutional Review Board