Citalopram to Enhance Cognition in HD (CIT-HD)
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
University of Iowa
Collaborators:
Cure Huntington's Disease Initiative (CHDI)
University of Rochester
Mayo Clinic
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Jess G. Fiedorowicz, University of Iowa
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00271596
First received: December 30, 2005
Last updated: February 8, 2013
Last verified: February 2013
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Results First Received: December 19, 2012
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized; Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator); Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Conditions: |
Huntington Disease Chorea Executive Dysfunction |
| Interventions: |
Drug: 20mg daily citalopram Drug: Placebo |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| Thirty-six individuals were screened and 33 participants were randomized between May 2007 and April 2011 Participants were recruited using advertisements, by speaking at HD events, through local clinics and through two HD registries: The University of Iowa HD registry and the National HD Research Roster (Indiana). |
Pre-Assignment Details
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| Following the baseline visit, participants completed a study visit (i.e., Visit 01) after 2 weeks in order to wash-out practice effects on primary outcome measures. To further control for practice effects, participants received placebo for 14 days prior to randomization (i.e., using a placebo run-in design). |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Citalopram | 20mg daily citalopram |
| Placebo | Matching daily placebo |
Participant Flow: Overall Study
| Citalopram | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 17 | 16 |
| COMPLETED | 16 | 15 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 1 | 1 |
| Protocol Violation | 1 | 0 |
| Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 1 |
Baseline Characteristics
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Citalopram | 20mg daily citalopram |
| Placebo | Matching daily placebo |
| Total | Total of all reporting groups |
Baseline Measures
| Citalopram | Placebo | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
17 | 16 | 33 |
|
Age
[units: years] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
|||
| Age | 47.33 ± 14.61 | 45.13 ± 13.59 | 46.2 ± 13.9 |
|
Gender
[units: participants] |
|||
| Female | 8 | 7 | 15 |
| Male | 9 | 9 | 18 |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Executive Function Composite Score Comparing Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visits 5 (Week 12) & 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort. [ Time Frame: after 15 weeks of treatment ] |
| 2. Secondary: | Letter Number Sequencing Score Comparing Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visits 5 (Week 12) & 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort [ Time Frame: after 15 weeks of treatment ] |
| 3. Secondary: | Semantic Fluency Score Comparing Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visits 5 (Week 12) & 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort [ Time Frame: after 15 weeks of treatment ] |
| 4. Secondary: | Symbol-Digit Modalities Score Comparing Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visits 5 (Week 12) & 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort [ Time Frame: after 15 weeks of treatment ] |
| 5. Secondary: | Verbal Fluency Score Comparing Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visits 5 (Week 12) & 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort [ Time Frame: after 15 weeks of treatment ] |
| 6. Secondary: | Stroop Interference Score Comparing Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visits 5 (Week 12) & 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort [ Time Frame: after 15 weeks of treatment ] |
| 7. Secondary: | Trails B Score Comparing Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visits 5 (Week 12) & 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort [ Time Frame: after 15 weeks of treatment ] |
| 8. Secondary: | Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression Comparing Screening (Intake Visit) to Visit 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort [ Time Frame: after 15 weeks of treatment ] |
| 9. Secondary: | Total Functional Capacity Score Comparing Baseline (Week -4) to Visits 4 (Week 6) & 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort [ Time Frame: after 15 weeks of treatment ] |
| 10. Secondary: | Subgroup Analysis of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Comparing Screening (Intake Visit) to Visit 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort [ Time Frame: after 15 weeks of treatment ] |
More Information
Certain Agreements:
Limitations and Caveats
Results Point of Contact:
Publications:
| All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study. |
Limitations and Caveats
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| Statistical power was limited. |
Results Point of Contact:
Name/Title: Leigh Beglinger, PhD
Organization: University of Iowa; Elks Rehab Hospital
phone: 319-353-4489
e-mail: leigh-beglinger@elksrehab.org
Organization: University of Iowa; Elks Rehab Hospital
phone: 319-353-4489
e-mail: leigh-beglinger@elksrehab.org
Publications:
| Responsible Party: | Jess G. Fiedorowicz, University of Iowa |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00271596 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 200509746, 5K23NS055733, A-2063 |
| Study First Received: | December 30, 2005 |
| Results First Received: | December 19, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | February 8, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Federal Government |