|
Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized; Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator); Primary Purpose: Supportive Care |
| Condition: |
Nausea |
| Intervention: |
Behavioral: Acupressure expectancy enhancement |
Participant Flow
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| Patients were recruited at three cancer clinics from Feb. 6, 2006 to April 23, 2009 |
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| No text entered. |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Control Handout and Control Tape. | Patients received two acupressure bands. Patients received an expectancy-neutral handout that simply thanked them for participating in the study. The wording of the letter was, “Thank you for agreeing to participate in this study regarding the use of acupressure bands to control chemotherapy-related nausea. The information you will provide is extremely valuable. It is only with the assistance of individuals, like you, who are willing to give their time that we can learn new ways to better control the side effects of cancer treatment. Wear the acupressure bands for up to five days, if helpful, to prevent or alleviate nausea. We are very appreciative of your contribution to this study.” Patients received an expectancy-neutral relaxation CD that was about 12 minutes in length and utilized guided imagery in which the individual visualized pleasant, soothing images or scenes while relaxed. |
| Active Handout and Control Tape. |
Patients received two acupressure bands. Patients received an expectancy-enhancing handout to enhance expected acupressure band efficacy. It was printed on Cancer Center letterhead and signed by a medical oncologist and two of the study investigators. The handout presented a very positive (and truthful) interpretation of the data from two prior acupressure band studies. Patients also received a medical prescription instructing them to use the acupressure bands for relief of nausea. The prescription was signed by a medical oncologist and had the instruction, “Wear Seabands for up to five days as needed to prevent or alleviate nausea.” Patients’ names were not on the prescription. Patients received an expectancy-neutral relaxation CD that was about 12 minutes in length and utilized guided imagery in which the individual visualized pleasant, soothing images or scenes while relaxed. |
| Control Handout and Active Tape. |
Patients received two acupressure bands. Patients received the same expectancy-neutral handout given to patients in Arm 1. Patients received the same relaxation CD as patients in the control condition with additional language inserted concerning efficacy of the acupressure bands and control of nausea. This additional language is under one minute in length and intended to strengthen patients’ beliefs that the acupressure bands would be effective by focusing patients’ attention on how effective the acupressure bands have been in reducing or eliminating nausea for other patients. In addition, it was suggested that since the acupressure bands were helpful to others, they might be helpful to them as well. |
| Active Handout and Active Tape. |
Patients received two acupressure bands. Patients received the same expectancy- enhancing handout given to patients in Arm 1. Patients received the same expectancy-enhancing CD given to patients in Arm 3. |
| Control Handout and Control Tape. | Active Handout and Control Tape. | Control Handout and Active Tape. | Active Handout and Active Tape. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 31 | 11 | 12 | 29 |
| COMPLETED | 28 | 10 | 11 | 25 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Protocol Violation | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
Baseline Characteristics
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Control Handout and Control Tape. | Patients received two acupressure bands. Patients received an expectancy-neutral handout that simply thanked them for participating in the study. The wording of the letter was, “Thank you for agreeing to participate in this study regarding the use of acupressure bands to control chemotherapy-related nausea. The information you will provide is extremely valuable. It is only with the assistance of individuals, like you, who are willing to give their time that we can learn new ways to better control the side effects of cancer treatment. Wear the acupressure bands for up to five days, if helpful, to prevent or alleviate nausea. We are very appreciative of your contribution to this study.” Patients received an expectancy-neutral relaxation CD that was about 12 minutes in length and utilized guided imagery in which the individual visualized pleasant, soothing images or scenes while relaxed. |
| Active Handout and Control Tape. |
Patients received two acupressure bands. Patients received an expectancy-enhancing handout to enhance expected acupressure band efficacy. It was printed on Cancer Center letterhead and signed by a medical oncologist and two of the study investigators. The handout presented a very positive (and truthful) interpretation of the data from two prior acupressure band studies. Patients also received a medical prescription instructing them to use the acupressure bands for relief of nausea. The prescription was signed by a medical oncologist and had the instruction, “Wear Seabands for up to five days as needed to prevent or alleviate nausea.” Patients’ names were not on the prescription. Patients received an expectancy-neutral relaxation CD that was about 12 minutes in length and utilized guided imagery in which the individual visualized pleasant, soothing images or scenes while relaxed. |
| Control Handout and Active Tape. |
Patients received two acupressure bands. Patients received the same expectancy-neutral handout given to patients in Arm 1. Patients received the same relaxation CD as patients in the control condition with additional language inserted concerning efficacy of the acupressure bands and control of nausea. This additional language is under one minute in length and intended to strengthen patients’ beliefs that the acupressure bands would be effective by focusing patients’ attention on how effective the acupressure bands have been in reducing or eliminating nausea for other patients. In addition, it was suggested that since the acupressure bands were helpful to others, they might be helpful to them as well. |
| Active Handout and Active Tape. |
Patients received two acupressure bands. Patients received the same expectancy- enhancing handout given to patients in Arm 1. Patients received the same expectancy-enhancing CD given to patients in Arm 3. |
| Control Handout and Control Tape. | Active Handout and Control Tape. | Control Handout and Active Tape. | Active Handout and Active Tape. | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
31 | 11 | 12 | 29 | 83 |
|
Age
[units: participants] |
|||||
| <=18 years | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 29 | 9 | 11 | 24 | 73 |
| >=65 years | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 10 |
|
Age
[units: years] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
48.2 ± 10.5 | 53.9 ± 9.4 | 49.1 ± 11.1 | 55.4 ± 9.9 | 51.6 ± 10.6 |
|
Gender
[units: participants] |
|||||
| Female | 31 | 11 | 12 | 29 | 83 |
| Male | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Region of Enrollment
[units: participants] |
|||||
| United States | 31 | 11 | 12 | 29 | 83 |
Outcome Measures
More Information
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. |
| There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. |
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| Limitations include a small sample size and the fact that we ceased recruitment to two of the treatment arms and changed our planned primary analysis mid-study based upon an interim analysis that was not specified at the time the study began. |
| Responsible Party: | Joseph Roscoe, U Rochester |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00243269 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | U2905 |
| Study First Received: | October 19, 2005 |
| Results First Received: | March 22, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | December 20, 2010 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |