Kidney Spare the Nephron (STN) Study - A Study of CellCept (Mycophenolate Mofetil) and Rapamune (Sirolimus) in Kidney Transplant Recipients
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized; Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Open Label; Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Condition: |
Kidney Transplantation |
| Interventions: |
Drug: mycophenolate mofetil [CellCept] Drug: Corticosteroids Drug: Calcineurin inhibitors Drug: Sirolimus |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Pre-Assignment Details
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Mycophenolate Mofetil + Sirolimus | Mycophenolate mofetil orally twice daily at a dose of 1.0 g to 1.5 g + sirolimus orally at a dose of 2 g to 10 g followed by a maintenance dose of 2 mg once daily |
| Mycophenolate Mofetil + Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus | Mycophenolate mofetil orally twice daily at a dose of 1.0 g to 1.5 g + cyclosporine or tacrolimus according to the study center protocol |
Participant Flow: Overall Study
| Mycophenolate Mofetil + Sirolimus | Mycophenolate Mofetil + Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 151 | 154 |
| Safety Population | 148 | 153 |
| Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population | 148 | 151 |
| COMPLETED | 121 | 115 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 30 | 39 |
Baseline Characteristics
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Mycophenolate Mofetil + Sirolimus | Mycophenolate mofetil orally twice daily at a dose of 1.0 g to 1.5 g + sirolimus orally at a dose of 2 g to 10 g followed by a maintenance dose of 2 mg once daily |
| Mycophenolate Mofetil + Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus | Mycophenolate mofetil orally twice daily at a dose of 1.0 g to 1.5 g + cyclosporine or tacrolimus according to the study center protocol |
| Total | Total of all reporting groups |
Baseline Measures
| Mycophenolate Mofetil + Sirolimus | Mycophenolate Mofetil + Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
148 | 151 | 299 |
|
Age
[1] [units: years] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
48.7 ± 12.90 | 48.7 ± 12.70 | 48.7 ± 12.80 |
|
Gender
[1] [units: participants] |
|||
| Female | 55 | 55 | 110 |
| Male | 93 | 96 | 189 |
| [1] | Intent-to-treat population |
|---|
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Mean Percent Change in Glomerular Filtration Rate From Baseline to Month 12 [ Time Frame: baseline to 12 months ] |
| Measure Type | Primary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Mean Percent Change in Glomerular Filtration Rate From Baseline to Month 12 |
| Measure Description |
The primary efficacy endpoint was mean percent change in renal function from baseline to 12 months postrandomization, as measured by Glomerular Filtration Rate utilizing renal clearance of cold iothalamate. percent change= [(Glomerular Filtration Rate at Month 12-Glomerular Filtration Rate at baseline)/Glomerular Filtration Rate at baseline]*100 percent. |
| Time Frame | baseline to 12 months |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Intent-to-treat population. Analysis population (AP) at Baseline: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) + sirolimus = 148, MMF + cyclosporine or tacrolimus (CNI) = 151; AP at Month 12: MMF+sirolimus = 120, MMF+CNI = 111. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Mycophenolate Mofetil + Sirolimus | Mycophenolate mofetil orally twice daily at a dose of 1.0 g to 1.5 g + sirolimus orally at a dose of 2 g to 10 g followed by a maintenance dose of 2 mg once daily |
| Mycophenolate Mofetil + Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus | Mycophenolate mofetil orally twice daily at a dose of 1.0 g to 1.5 g + cyclosporine or tacrolimus according to the study center protocol |
Measured Values
| Mycophenolate Mofetil + Sirolimus | Mycophenolate Mofetil + Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
148 | 151 |
|
Mean Percent Change in Glomerular Filtration Rate From Baseline to Month 12
[units: percent change] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
||
| Baseline | 59.5 ± 23.86 | 58.8 ± 26.06 |
| Mean Percent Change from Baseline at Month 12 | 24.4 ± 70.00 | 5.2 ± 56.33 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Mean Percent Change in Glomerular Filtration Rate From Baseline to Month 12
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.012 |
| Median Difference (Net) [4] | 18.7 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( 4.2 to 33.2 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| The primary analysis tested the null hypothesis that mean percent change from baseline to 12 months for Group 1 (mycophenolate mofetil + sirolimus) was equal to that for Group 2 (mycophenolate mofetil + cyclosporine or tacrolimus) based on the intent-to-treat population. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P value comparing the treatment groups calculated using ANCOVA model treatment and baseline calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine or tacrolimus) as factors and baseline measurement and time from transplant to randomization as covariates. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| 2. Secondary: | Mean Percent Change in Glomerular Filtration Rate From Baseline to Month 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline to 24 months ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Mean Percent Change in Glomerular Filtration Rate From Baseline to Month 24 |
| Measure Description |
A secondary efficacy endpoint was mean percent change in renal function from baseline to 24 months postrandomization, as measured by Glomerular Filtration Rate utilizing renal clearance of cold iothalamate. percent change= [(Glomerular Filtration Rate at Month 24-Glomerular Filtration Rate at baseline)/Glomerular Filtration Rate at baseline]*100 percent. |
| Time Frame | Baseline to 24 months |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Intent-to-treat population. Analysis population (AP) at Baseline: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) + sirolimus = 148, MMF + cyclosporine or tacrolimus (CNI) = 151; AP at Month 24: MMF+sirolimus = 115, MMF+CNI = 105. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Mycophenolate Mofetil + Sirolimus | Mycophenolate mofetil orally twice daily at a dose of 1.0 g to 1.5 g + sirolimus orally at a dose of 2 g to 10 g followed by a maintenance dose of 2 mg once daily |
| Mycophenolate Mofetil + Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus | Mycophenolate mofetil orally twice daily at a dose of 1.0 g to 1.5 g + cyclosporine or tacrolimus according to the study center protocol |
Measured Values
| Mycophenolate Mofetil + Sirolimus | Mycophenolate Mofetil + Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
148 | 151 |
|
Mean Percent Change in Glomerular Filtration Rate From Baseline to Month 24
[units: percent change] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
||
| Baseline | 59.5 ± 23.86 | 58.8 ± 26.06 |
| Percent Change from Baseline at Month 24 | 8.6 ± 55.32 | 3.4 ± 67.28 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Mean Percent Change in Glomerular Filtration Rate From Baseline to Month 24
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.543 |
| Mean Difference (Net) [4] | 4.3 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -9.6 to 18.2 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P value comparing the treatment groups calculated using ANCOVA model treatment and baseline calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine or tacrolimus) type as factors and baseline measurement and time from transplant to randomization as covariates. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| 3. Secondary: | Mean Percent Change in Serum Creatinine From Baseline to Months 6, 12, and 24 [ Time Frame: baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Mean Percent Change in Serum Creatinine From Baseline to Months 6, 12, and 24 |
| Measure Description |
Renal allograft function determined by mean percent change from baseline in serum creatinine by treatment group at 6, 12, and 24 months postrandomization. percent change= [(serum creatinine at Month t-serum creatinine at baseline)/serum creatinine at baseline]*100 percent, where t=6, 12, and 24 months postrandomization. |
| Time Frame | baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Intent-to-treat population. Analysis population (AP) at Baseline: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) + sirolimus = 148, MMF + cyclosporine or tacrolimus (CNI) = 151; AP at Month 6: MMF+sirolimus = 117, MMF+CNI = 130; AP at Month 12: MMF+sirolimus = 124, MMF+CNI = 123; AP at Month 24: MMF+sirolimus = 120, MMF+CNI = 116. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Mycophenolate Mofetil + Sirolimus | Mycophenolate mofetil orally twice daily at a dose of 1.0 g to 1.5 g + sirolimus orally at a dose of 2 g to 10 g followed by a maintenance dose of 2 mg once daily |
| Mycophenolate Mofetil + Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus | Mycophenolate mofetil orally twice daily at a dose of 1.0 g to 1.5 g + cyclosporine or tacrolimus according to the study center protocol |
Measured Values
| Mycophenolate Mofetil + Sirolimus | Mycophenolate Mofetil + Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
148 | 151 |
|
Mean Percent Change in Serum Creatinine From Baseline to Months 6, 12, and 24
[units: percent change] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
||
| Baseline | 121.1 ± 29.96 | 124.4 ± 37.87 |
| Percent Change from Baseline at Month 6 | -3.7 ± 18.78 | 6.6 ± 34.61 |
| Percent Change from Baseline at Month 12 | 6.0 ± 57.81 | 20.4 ± 92.81 |
| Percent Change from Baseline at Month 24 | 6.1 ± 59.84 | 30.8 ± 114.23 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Mean Percent Change in Serum Creatinine From Baseline to Months 6, 12, and 24
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.003 |
| Median Difference (Net) [4] | -10.8 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -17.9 to -3.7 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| 6 months | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P value comparing the two treatment groups is calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and baseline calcineurin inhibitor type (cyclosporine or tacrolimus) as factors, and baseline measurement and time from transplant to randomization as covariates. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
Statistical Analysis 2 for Mean Percent Change in Serum Creatinine From Baseline to Months 6, 12, and 24
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.108 |
| Mean Difference (Net) [4] | -16.0 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -35.4 to 3.5 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| 12 months | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P value comparing the two treatment groups is calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and baseline calcineurin inhibitor type (cyclosporine or tacrolimus) as factors, and baseline measurement and time from transplant to randomization as covariates. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
Statistical Analysis 3 for Mean Percent Change in Serum Creatinine From Baseline to Months 6, 12, and 24
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.039 |
| Mean Difference (Net) [4] | -24.4 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -47.7 to -1.2 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| 24 months | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P value comparing the two treatment groups is calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and baseline calcineurin inhibitor type (cyclosporine or tacrolimus) as factors, and baseline measurement and time from transplant to randomization as covariates. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| 4. Secondary: | Mean Percent Change in Calculated Creatinine Clearance From Baseline to Months 6, 12, and 24 [ Time Frame: baseline 6, 12, and 24 months ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Mean Percent Change in Calculated Creatinine Clearance From Baseline to Months 6, 12, and 24 |
| Measure Description |
Renal allograft function determined by mean percent change from baseline in calculated creatinine clearance (Cockroft and Gault method) by treatment group at 6, 12, and 24 months postrandomization. percent change= [(calculated creatinine clearance at Month t - calculated creatinine clearance at baseline)/calculated creatinine clearance at baseline]*100 percent, where t=6, 12, and 24 months postrandomization |
| Time Frame | baseline 6, 12, and 24 months |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Intent-to-treat population. Analysis population (AP) at Baseline: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) + sirolimus = 148, MMF + cyclosporine or tacrolimus (CNI) = 151; AP at Month 6: MMF+sirolimus = 117, MMF+CNI = 129; AP at Month 12: MMF+sirolimus = 124, MMF+CNI = 123; AP at Month 24: MMF+sirolimus = 120, MMF+CNI = 116. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Mycophenolate Mofetil + Sirolimus | Mycophenolate mofetil orally twice daily at a dose of 1.0 g to 1.5 g + sirolimus orally at a dose of 2 g to 10 g followed by a maintenance dose of 2 mg once daily |
| Mycophenolate Mofetil + Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus | Mycophenolate mofetil orally twice daily at a dose of 1.0 g to 1.5 g + cyclosporine or tacrolimus according to the study center protocol |
Measured Values
| Mycophenolate Mofetil + Sirolimus | Mycophenolate Mofetil + Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
148 | 151 |
|
Mean Percent Change in Calculated Creatinine Clearance From Baseline to Months 6, 12, and 24
[units: percent change] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
||
| Baseline | 59.7 ± 16.85 | 60.5 ± 19.97 |
| Percent Change from Baseline at Month 6 | 7.0 ± 19.54 | -1.7 ± 17.22 |
| Percent Change from Baseline at Month 12 | 4.4 ± 24.38 | -2.3 ± 25.09 |
| Percent Change from Baseline at Month 24 | 4.7 ± 27.58 | -4.2 ± 27.66 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Mean Percent Change in Calculated Creatinine Clearance From Baseline to Months 6, 12, and 24
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | <0.001 |
| Mean Difference (Net) [4] | 8.7 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( 4.1 to 13.3 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| 6 months | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P value comparing the two treatment groups is calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and baseline calcineurin inhibitor type (cyclosporine or tacrolimus) as factors, and baseline measurement and time from transplant to randomization as covariates. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
Statistical Analysis 2 for Mean Percent Change in Calculated Creatinine Clearance From Baseline to Months 6, 12, and 24
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.029 |
| Mean Difference (Net) [4] | 6.9 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( 0.7 to 13.1 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| 12 months | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P value comparing the two treatment groups is calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and baseline calcineurin inhibitor type (cyclosporine or tacrolimus) as factors, and baseline measurement and time from transplant to randomization as covariates. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
Statistical Analysis 3 for Mean Percent Change in Calculated Creatinine Clearance From Baseline to Months 6, 12, and 24
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.015 |
| Mean Difference (Net) [4] | 8.8 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( 1.7 to 15.9 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| 24 months | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P value comparing the two treatment groups is calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and baseline calcineurin inhibitor type (cyclosporine or tacrolimus) as factors, and baseline measurement and time from transplant to randomization as covariates. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
| 5. Secondary: | Mean Percent Change in Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate From Baseline to Months 6, 12, and 24 (Nankivell Equation) [ Time Frame: baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months ] |
| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Mean Percent Change in Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate From Baseline to Months 6, 12, and 24 (Nankivell Equation) |
| Measure Description |
Renal allograft function determined by mean percent change from baseline in calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (Nankivell equation) by treatment group at 6, 12, and 24 months postrandomization. percent change= [(calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate at Month t - calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate at baseline)/calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate at baseline]*100 percent, where t=6, 12, and 24 months postrandomization. |
| Time Frame | baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| Intent-to-treat population. Analysis population (AP) at Baseline: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) + sirolimus = 148, MMF + cyclosporine or tacrolimus (CNI) = 151; AP at Month 6: MMF+sirolimus = 117, MMF+CNI = 130; AP at Month 12: MMF+sirolimus = 123, MMF+CNI = 123; AP at Month 24: MMF+sirolimus = 120, MMF+CNI = 116. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Mycophenolate Mofetil + Sirolimus | Mycophenolate mofetil orally twice daily at a dose of 1.0 g to 1.5 g + sirolimus orally at a dose of 2 g to 10 g followed by a maintenance dose of 2 mg once daily |
| Mycophenolate Mofetil + Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus | Mycophenolate mofetil orally twice daily at a dose of 1.0 g to 1.5 g + cyclosporine or tacrolimus according to the study center protocol |
Measured Values
| Mycophenolate Mofetil + Sirolimus | Mycophenolate Mofetil + Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
148 | 151 |
|
Mean Percent Change in Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate From Baseline to Months 6, 12, and 24 (Nankivell Equation)
[units: percent change] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
||
| Baseline | 71.3 ± 13.82 | 72.7 ± 16.2 |
| Percent Change from Baseline at Month 6 | 8.3 ± 19.57 | -0.5 ± 15.98 |
| Percent Change from Baseline at Month 12 | 5.2 ± 25.33 | -0.9 ± 23.42 |
| Percent Change from Baseline at Month 24 | 6.5 ± 28.43 | -1.8 ± 27.31 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Mean Percent Change in Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate From Baseline to Months 6, 12, and 24 (Nankivell Equation)
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | <0.001 |
| Mean Difference (Net) [4] | 8.5 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( 4.2 to 12.9 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| 6 months | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P value comparing the two treatment groups is calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and baseline calcineurin inhibitor type (cyclosporine or tacrolimus) as factors, and baseline measurement and time from transplant to randomization as covariates. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
Statistical Analysis 2 for Mean Percent Change in Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate From Baseline to Months 6, 12, and 24 (Nankivell Equation)
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.059 |
| Mean Difference (Net) [4] | 5.8 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( -0.2 to 11.9 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| 12 months | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P value comparing the two treatment groups is calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and baseline calcineurin inhibitor type (cyclosporine or tacrolimus) as factors, and baseline measurement and time from transplant to randomization as covariates. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
Statistical Analysis 3 for Mean Percent Change in Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate From Baseline to Months 6, 12, and 24 (Nankivell Equation)
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | ANCOVA |
| P Value [3] | 0.036 |
| Mean Difference (Net) [4] | 7.5 |
| 95% Confidence Interval | ( 0.5 to 14.5 ) |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| 24 months | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| P value comparing the two treatment groups is calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and baseline calcineurin inhibitor type (cyclosporine or tacrolimus) as factors, and baseline measurement and time from transplant to randomization as covariates. | |
| [4] | Other relevant estimation information: |
| No text entered. |
More Information
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. | ||||||
| There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. | ||||||
The agreement is:
|
Limitations and Caveats
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Results Point of Contact:
Organization: Hoffmann-La Roche
phone: 800-821-8590
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Disclosures Group, Hoffmann-La Roche |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00121810 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | ML17140 |
| Study First Received: | July 15, 2005 |
| Results First Received: | November 18, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | April 13, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |