A Safety and Efficacy Study of Prograf in the Prevention of Erectile Dysfunction After Radical Prostatectomy
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Astellas Pharma Inc
Information provided by:
Astellas Pharma Inc
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00106392
First received: March 23, 2005
Last updated: November 15, 2010
Last verified: November 2010
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Results First Received: September 30, 2010
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized; Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor); Primary Purpose: Prevention |
| Conditions: |
Erectile Dysfunction Prostate Cancer |
| Interventions: |
Drug: Tacrolimus Drug: Placebo |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Pre-Assignment Details
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Tacrolimus | Preoperatively: Tacrolimus 2 mg oral daily from 4 to 10 days prior to surgery through hospital discharge; Postoperatively: Tacrolimus 3 mg oral daily at time of hospital discharge through 6 months of follow up. |
| Placebo | Preoperatively: Matching placebo oral daily from 4 to 10 days prior to surgery through hospital discharge; Postoperatively: Matching placebo oral daily at time of hospital discharge through 6 months of follow up. |
Participant Flow: Overall Study
| Tacrolimus | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 62 | 69 |
| Baseline Participants | 59 [1] | 65 [2] |
| Full Analysis Set (FAS) | 53 | 61 |
| COMPLETED | 36 | 42 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 26 | 27 |
| [1] | 3 patients withdrew: 2 prior to surgery and study drug; 1 took study drug but did not have surgery |
|---|---|
| [2] | 4 patients withdrew: all prior to surgery and study drug |
Baseline Characteristics
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Tacrolimus | Preoperatively: Tacrolimus 2 mg oral daily from 4 to 10 days prior to surgery through hospital discharge; Postoperatively: Tacrolimus 3 mg oral daily at time of hospital discharge through 6 months of follow up. |
| Placebo | Preoperatively: Matching placebo oral daily from 4 to 10 days prior to surgery through hospital discharge; Postoperatively: Matching placebo oral daily at time of hospital discharge through 6 months of follow up. |
| Total | Total of all reporting groups |
Baseline Measures
| Tacrolimus | Placebo | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
59 | 65 | 124 |
|
Age
[units: years] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
55.1 ± 6.2 | 54.1 ± 6.2 | 54.6 ± 6.2 |
|
Gender
[units: participants] |
|||
| Female | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Male | 59 | 65 | 124 |
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
[units: Participants] |
|||
| American Indian or Alaskan Native | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Black or African American | 4 | 1 | 5 |
| White | 55 | 63 | 118 |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Erectile Function Domain Score Between Treated and Untreated Groups [ Time Frame: 18 months ] |
| 2. Secondary: | Percentage of Patients Achieving Normal Spontaneous Erectile Function as Measured by the Erectile Function (EF) Domain Score [ Time Frame: 24 months ] |
| 3. Secondary: | Time Taken to Achieve Normalization of the Erectile Function (EF) Domain Score [ Time Frame: 24 months ] |
| 4. Secondary: | Percentage of Patients Considered Successful Responders to Impotence Medications [ Time Frame: 24 months ] |
| 5. Secondary: | Time to Achieve Response to Impotence Medications [ Time Frame: 24 months ] |
| 6. Secondary: | Continence Level as Quantified by Part I of the Prostate Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire [ Time Frame: 24 months ] |
Hide Outcome Measure 6| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Continence Level as Quantified by Part I of the Prostate Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire |
| Measure Description | Part 1 Urinary Function- Prostate Health-Related Quality-of-Life (QOL) Questionnaire consists of 16 questions asking patients about their continence and urinary habits over the previous four weeks. The responses to all 16 of these questions were added together to calculate an overall score for urinary function. The minimum possible score is 16 and the maximum possible score is 79. A higher score indicates a lower continence level. |
| Time Frame | 24 months |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
|
The number of participants analyzed represents Full Analysis Set (FAS), which is defined as participants evaluated for Efficacy and Safety. Only participants with a Prostate Health-Related QOL questionnaire at 24 months were included in the calculation. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Tacrolimus | Preoperatively: Tacrolimus 2 mg oral daily from 4 to 10 days prior to surgery through hospital discharge; Postoperatively: Tacrolimus 3 mg oral daily at time of hospital discharge through 6 months of follow up. |
| Placebo | Preoperatively: Matching placebo oral daily from 4 to 10 days prior to surgery through hospital discharge; Postoperatively: Matching placebo oral daily at time of hospital discharge through 6 months of follow up. |
Measured Values
| Tacrolimus | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
39 | 47 |
|
Continence Level as Quantified by Part I of the Prostate Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire
[units: Overall Score of Urinary Function] Median ( Full Range ) |
22.0
( 16.0 to 49.0 ) |
22.0
( 16.0 to 52.0 ) |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Continence Level as Quantified by Part I of the Prostate Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire
| Groups [1] | All groups |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) |
| P Value [3] | 0.879 |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| No text entered. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. |
More Information
Certain Agreements:
Limitations and Caveats
Results Point of Contact:
No publications provided
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. | ||||||
| There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. | ||||||
The agreement is:
|
Limitations and Caveats
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| Company makes no warranties or representations of any kind as to the posting, expressed or implied, including warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, and shall not be liable for any damages. |
Results Point of Contact:
Name/Title: Senior Medical Director, Medical Affairs
Organization: Astellas Pharma Global Development
e-mail: clinicaltrials@us.astellas.com
Organization: Astellas Pharma Global Development
e-mail: clinicaltrials@us.astellas.com
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Sr Manager Clinical Trial Registries, Astellas Pharma US, Inc |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00106392 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 20-03-001 |
| Study First Received: | March 23, 2005 |
| Results First Received: | September 30, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | November 15, 2010 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |