Full Text View
Tabular View
Study Results
Related Studies
A Survival Study in Patients With High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes Comparing Azacitidine Versus Conventional Care
This study has been completed.
Study NCT00071799   Information provided by Celgene Corporation

First Received on October 31, 2003.   Last Updated on August 24, 2010   History of Changes
Results First Received: March 2, 2010  
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized;   Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study;   Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment;   Masking: Open Label
Condition: Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Interventions: Drug: Azacitidine
Other: Physician Choice

  Participant Flow
  Hide Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations
No text entered.

Pre-Assignment Details
Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment
738 patients screened from 98 investigator sites. Randomized patients contributed by 79 investigator sites.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Azacitidine Azacitidine, 75 mg/m^2/day given by subcutaneous injection for 7 days of every 28 day cycle, plus best supportive care.
Conventional Care Physician choice of low dose cytarabine, standard chemotherapy, or best supportive care (consisting of blood products, growth factors, antibiotics)

Participant Flow:   Overall Study
    Azacitidine     Conventional Care  
STARTED     179     179 [1]
COMPLETED     109 [2]   81 [3]
NOT COMPLETED     70     98  
Adverse Event                 19                 10  
Protocol Violation                 1                 7  
Lost to Follow-up                 1                 1  
Withdrawal by Subject                 15                 37  
Physician Decision                 0                 2  
Lack of Efficacy                 11                 18  
Disease Progression                 23                 20  
Different Central+Local Pathology Review                 0                 1  
Not Documented                 0                 2  
[1] Best supportive care: 105, Low-dose cytarabine: 49, Standard chemotherapy: 25 patients
[2] Includes those who died or transformed to AML, or receiving drug + eligible for extension period.
[3] Includes patients who died or transformed to AML during treatment, or were still receiving drug.



  Baseline Characteristics
  Hide Baseline Characteristics

Reporting Groups
  Description
Azacitidine Azacitidine, 75 mg/m^2/day given by subcutaneous injection for 7 days of every 28 day cycle, plus best supportive care.
Conventional Care Physician choice of low dose cytarabine, standard chemotherapy, or best supportive care (consisting of blood products, growth factors, antibiotics)

Baseline Measures
    Azacitidine     Conventional Care     Total  
Number of Participants  
[units: participants]
  179     179     358  
Age  
[units: years]
Mean ± Standard Deviation
  68.0  ± 7.57     69.2  ± 7.87     68.6  ± 7.73  
Gender  
[units: participants]
     
Female     47     60     107  
Male     132     119     251  
Race/Ethnicity, Customized  
[units: participants]
     
Caucasian     177     175     352  
Black or African American     0     0     0  
Asian/Oriental     2     3     5  
Hispanic     0     1     1  
Other     0     0     0  
French-American-British (FAB) Classification [1]
[units: participants]
     
Refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB)     104     103     207  
RAEB in transformation     61     62     123  
Modified chronic myelomonocytic leukemia     6     5     11  
Acute myeloid leukemia     1     1     2  
Myeloproliferative disease     4     2     6  
Indeterminate     3     6     9  
International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) [2]
[units: participants]
     
Intermediate risk level 1 (0.5-1.0)     5     13     18  
Intermediate risk level 2 (1.5-2.0)     76     70     146  
High risk (2.5-3.5)     82     85     167  
Not applicable     5     3     8  
Indeterminate     11     8     19  
World Health Organization (WHO) Classification [3]
[units: participants]
     
Refractory anemia with excess blasts - 1     14     17     31  
Refractory anemia with excess blasts - 2     98     95     193  
Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia - 1 (CMMoL-1)     1     0     1  
Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia - 2 (CMMoL-2)     10     5     15  
Acute myeloid leukemia     55     58     113  
Indeterminate     1     4     5  
Body Surface Area  
[units: meters squared]
Mean ± Standard Deviation
  1.9  ± 0.19     1.8  ± 0.19     1.9  ± 0.19  
Weight  
[units: kilograms]
Mean ± Standard Deviation
  76.5  ± 14.08     74.6  ± 13.58     75.6  ± 13.85  
[1] FAB classifications were determined by the Independent Review Committee
[2] The international prognostic scoring system (IPSS) is a standard for risk assessment in primary myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) that categorizes prognoses taking into account cytogenetics, cytopenias, blasts and blood counts. The scale is 0-3.5 at .5 increments. Scores of 2.5-3.5 represent high risk which corresponds to poorer prognosis. The assessment was performed by the Independent Review Committee.
[3] WHO classifications were determined by the Independent Review Committee



  Outcome Measures
  Show All Outcome Measures

1.  Primary:   Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Median Time to Death From Any Cause   [ Time Frame: Day 1 (randomization) to 42 months ]

2.  Primary:   Summary of Subgroup Analyses for Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Death From Any Cause   [ Time Frame: Day 1 (randomization) to 42 months ]

3.  Primary:   Number of Participants Who Died   [ Time Frame: 42 months ]

4.  Secondary:   Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Median Time to Transformation to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or Death From Any Cause, Whichever Occurred First   [ Time Frame: Day 1 (randomization) to 42 months ]

5.  Secondary:   Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Median Time to Transformation to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)   [ Time Frame: Day 1 (randomization) to 42 months ]

6.  Secondary:   Summary of Participants' Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Status for Participants Who Were Transfusion Dependent at Baseline   [ Time Frame: Day 1 (randomization) to 42 months ]

7.  Secondary:   Summary of Participants' Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Status for Participants Who Were Transfusion Independent at Baseline   [ Time Frame: Day 1 (randomization) to 42 months ]

8.  Secondary:   Summary of Participants' Platelet Transfusion Status for Participants Who Were Transfusion Dependent at Baseline   [ Time Frame: Day 1 (randomization) to 42 months ]

9.  Secondary:   Summary of Participants' Platelet Transfusion Status for Participants Who Were Transfusion Independent at Baseline   [ Time Frame: Day 1 (randomization) to 42 months ]

10.  Secondary:   Number of Participants Considered Hematologic Responders by Investigator Determinations Using International Working Group (IWG 2000) Criteria for Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)   [ Time Frame: Day 1 to 42 months ]

11.  Secondary:   Number of Participants Showing Hematologic Improvement Using International Working Group (IWG 2000) Criteria for Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Assessed by Independent Review Committee   [ Time Frame: Day 1 to 42 months ]

12.  Secondary:   Time to Disease Progression, Relapse After Complete or Partial Remission, or Death From Any Cause   [ Time Frame: Day 1 (randomization) to 42 months ]

13.  Secondary:   Duration of Any Hematologic Improvement   [ Time Frame: Day 1 (randomization) to 42 months ]

14.  Secondary:   Number of Infections Per Treatment Year Requiring Intravenous Antibiotics, Antifungals or Antivirals   [ Time Frame: Day 1 (randomization) to 42 months ]

15.  Secondary:   Number of Participants in Different Categories of Adverse Experiences During Core Study Period   [ Time Frame: Day 1 (randomization) to 42 months ]

16.  Post-Hoc:   Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Median Time to Transformation to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Based on the Last Bone Marrow Assessment   [ Time Frame: Day 1 (randomization) to 42 months ]


  Serious Adverse Events
  Show Serious Adverse Events


  Other Adverse Events
  Show Other Adverse Events


  More Information
  Hide More Information

Certain Agreements:  
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
The agreement is:
unchecked The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 60 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.
unchecked The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is more than 60 days but less than or equal to 180 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.


Limitations and Caveats
Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data
No text entered.  


Results Point of Contact:  
Name/Title: CL Beach
Organization: Celgene Corporation
e-mail: CLBeach@celgene.com


Publications of Results:
Fenaux P, Mufti GJ, Hellström-Lindberg E, Santini V, Gattermann N, Germing U, Sanz G, List AF, Gore S, Seymour JF, Dombret H, Backstrom J, Zimmerman L, McKenzie D, Beach CL, Silverman LR. Azacitidine prolongs overall survival compared with conventional care regimens in elderly patients with low bone marrow blast count acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Feb 1;28(4):562-9. Epub 2009 Dec 21.
Fenaux P, Gattermann N, Seymour JF, Hellström-Lindberg E, Mufti GJ, Duehrsen U, Gore SD, Ramos F, Beyne-Rauzy O, List A, McKenzie D, Backstrom J, Beach CL. Prolonged survival with improved tolerability in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: azacitidine compared with low dose ara-C. Br J Haematol. 2010 Apr;149(2):244-9. Epub 2010 Feb 5. Erratum in: Br J Haematol. 2010 Jun;149(6):919.
Santini V, Fenaux P, Mufti GJ, Hellström-Lindberg E, Silverman LR, List A, Gore SD, Seymour JF, Backstrom J, Beach CL. Management and supportive care measures for adverse events in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes treated with azacitidine*. Eur J Haematol. 2010 Aug;85(2):130-8. Epub 2010 Apr 12.
Seymour JF, Fenaux P, Silverman LR, Mufti GJ, Hellström-Lindberg E, Santini V, List AF, Gore SD, Backstrom J, McKenzie D, Beach CL. Effects of azacitidine compared with conventional care regimens in elderly (>/=75 years) patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2010 May 5; [Epub ahead of print]
Fenaux P, Mufti GJ, Hellstrom-Lindberg E, Santini V, Finelli C, Giagounidis A, Schoch R, Gattermann N, Sanz G, List A, Gore SD, Seymour JF, Bennett JM, Byrd J, Backstrom J, Zimmerman L, McKenzie D, Beach C, Silverman LR; International Vidaza High-Risk MDS Survival Study Group. Efficacy of azacitidine compared with that of conventional care regimens in the treatment of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a randomised, open-label, phase III study. Lancet Oncol. 2009 Mar;10(3):223-32. Epub 2009 Feb 21.


Responsible Party: CL Beach/Senior Director Clinical Research and Development, Celgene Corporation
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00071799     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: AZA PH GL 2003 CL 001
Study First Received: October 31, 2003
Results First Received: March 2, 2010
Last Updated: August 24, 2010
Health Authority: United States: Food and Drug Administration