|
Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized; Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator); Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Condition: |
Herpes Simplex |
| Interventions: |
Drug: Acyclovir Drug: Placebo |
Participant Flow
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| Neonates diagnosed with HSV-1 or HSV-2 at least than or equal to 28 days of age as evidenced by infections limited to the skin, eye and mouth with normal CNS and treated with intravenous acyclovir therapy. |
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| Participants enrolled while on 2 weeks of IV acyclovir therapy who have positive CSF HSV PCR results within 48 hours prior to IV therapy completion, are not randomized. |
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Placebo | Identical to oral acyclovir suspension in appearance and taste. Volume is identical to the administration of active drug. |
| Acyclovir | Oral suspension 300 mg/m^2/dose TID for 6 months. |
| Placebo | Acyclovir | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 14 | 15 |
| COMPLETED | 4 | 8 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 10 | 7 |
| Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 1 |
| Non-compliant | 1 | 1 |
| Re-activation of Disease | 2 | 1 |
| Disruption of blinded study drug supply | 7 | 4 |
Baseline Characteristics
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Placebo | Identical to oral acyclovir suspension in appearance and taste. Volume is identical to the administration of active drug. |
| Acyclovir | Oral suspension 300 mg/m^2/dose TID for 6 months. |
| Placebo | Acyclovir | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
14 | 15 | 29 |
|
Age, Customized
[units: days] Median ( Full Range ) |
15
( 5 to 55 ) |
15
( 2 to 35 ) |
15
( 2 to 55 ) |
|
Age, Customized
[units: participants] |
|||
| < = 28 days | 14 | 15 | 29 |
| Between 29 days and 65 years | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| >=65 years | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Gender
[units: participants] |
|||
| Female | 6 | 5 | 11 |
| Male | 8 | 10 | 18 |
|
Region of Enrollment
[units: participants] |
|||
| United States | 14 | 14 | 28 |
| Canada | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Participants With Neurologic Impairment at 12 Months as Measured by a Bayley’s Neuro-developmental Assessment.(Motor Scores) [ Time Frame: At 12 months of life. ] |
| 2. Primary: | Participants With Neurologic Impairment at 12 Months as Measured by a Bayley's Neuro-developmental Assessment.(Mental Scores) [ Time Frame: At 12 months of life. ] |
| 3. Secondary: | Detection of Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) DNA in the Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) at Anytime During the Initial 12 Months of Life. [ Time Frame: post randomization at 12 months ] |
| 4. Secondary: | Two or Fewer Episodes of Cutaneous Recurrence of HSV Disease Post-randomization During the Initial 12 Months of Life. [ Time Frame: post randomization - 12 months ] |
More Information
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. |
| There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. |
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| No text entered. |
| Responsible Party: | Director ORA, HHS/NIAID/DMID |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00031447 History of Changes |
| Obsolete Identifiers: | NCT00001099 |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 97-006, CASG 104, N01AI30025C |
| Study First Received: | March 6, 2002 |
| Results First Received: | April 1, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | October 27, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | Canada: Ethics Review Committee; United States: Federal Government; United States: Food and Drug Administration; United States: Institutional Review Board |