Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide Compared With Epirubicin and Paclitaxel in Treating Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer

The recruitment status of this study is unknown because the information has not been verified recently.

Verified December 2005 by National Cancer Institute (NCI).
Recruitment status was Active, not recruiting

Sponsor:

Information provided by:

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:

NCT00002953

First received: November 1, 1999

Last updated: August 6, 2011

Last verified: December 2005

History of Changes

No Study Results Posted on ClinicalTrials.gov for this Study

About Study Results Reporting on ClinicalTrials.gov

Study Status:	This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants.
Estimated Study Completion Date:	No date given
Estimated Primary Completion Date:	No date given

Publications:

Langley RE, Carmichael J, Jones AL, Cameron DA, Qian W, Uscinska B, Howell A, Parmar M. Phase III trial of epirubicin plus paclitaxel compared with epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute trial AB01. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Nov 20;23(33):8322-30.

Carmichael J: UKCCCR trial of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (EC) vs. epirubicin and taxol (ET) in the first line treatment of women with metastatic breast cancer. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 20: A-84, 2001.

Carmichael J: UKCCCR trial of epirubucin and cyclophosphamide (EC) versus epirubicin and taxol (ET) in the first line treatment of women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). [Abstract] Br J Cancer 85 (suppl 1): A-CT6, 2, 2001.

To Top