Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide Compared With Epirubicin and Paclitaxel in Treating Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer

This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants.

Study NCT00002953 Information provided by National Cancer Institute (NCI)

First Received: November 1, 1999 Last Updated: August 6, 2011 History of Changes

No Study Results Posted on ClinicalTrials.gov for this Study

About Study Results Reporting on ClinicalTrials.gov

Study Status:	This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants.
Estimated Study Completion Date:	No date given
Estimated Primary Completion Date:	No date given

Publications:

Langley RE, Carmichael J, Jones AL, Cameron DA, Qian W, Uscinska B, Howell A, Parmar M. Phase III trial of epirubicin plus paclitaxel compared with epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute trial AB01. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Nov 20;23(33):8322-30.

Carmichael J: UKCCCR trial of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (EC) vs. epirubicin and taxol (ET) in the first line treatment of women with metastatic breast cancer. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 20: A-84, 2001.

Carmichael J: UKCCCR trial of epirubucin and cyclophosphamide (EC) versus epirubicin and taxol (ET) in the first line treatment of women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). [Abstract] Br J Cancer 85 (suppl 1): A-CT6, 2, 2001.