Exercise and Nutrition for Head and Neck Cancer Patients (ENHANCE)

This study is currently recruiting participants.
Verified September 2012 by University of Calgary
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
Alberta Cancer Foundation
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Dr. Nicole Culos-Reed, University of Calgary
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01681654
First received: August 31, 2012
Last updated: September 5, 2012
Last verified: September 2012

August 31, 2012
September 5, 2012
June 2012
August 2014   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Change from Baseline in Body Composition [ Time Frame: At baseline (diagnosis), and then at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post diagnosis ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
DXA Scan will be used to assess body composition
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01681654 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Quality of Life [ Time Frame: At baseline (diagnosis), and then at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post diagnosis ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Quality of Life will be assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- Anemia module (FACT-AN), and the NCCN-FACT Fact Head/Neck Symptom Index-22 (FHNSI-22).
  • Physical Activity Behaviour [ Time Frame: At baseline (diagnosis), and then at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post diagnosis ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Physical activity will be assessed using Godin's (Godin, 1985) leisure score index (LSI) of the GLTEQ (Godin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire).
  • Smoking History [ Time Frame: At baseline (diagnosis), and then at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post diagnosis ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Smoking history will be assessed by a self report questionnaire which will classify patients as non-smokers, former smokers and current smokers.
  • Depression [ Time Frame: At baseline (diagnosis), and then at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post diagnosis ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Depression will be assessed using the Center for Epidemiological Studies on Depression Scale (CES-D).
  • Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) [ Time Frame: At baseline (diagnosis), and then at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post diagnosis ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The Karnofsky Performance Score (KSP) will be used to measure the participant's general ability to accomplish tasks of daily-living and overall well-being.
  • Inflammatory Markers [ Time Frame: At baseline (diagnosis), and then at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post diagnosis ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Inflammatory factors will be evaluated as they are associated with cancer cachexia and muscle wasting and may be modified by exercise (Seruga et al., 2008; Baldwin, 2011). An overnight fasted blood draw will be collected at baseline, 3 months post diagnosis, 6 months post diagnosis, 9 months post diagnosis, and 12 months post diagnosis. Serum inflammatory cytokine concentrations will be assessed in-house (Dr. Raylene Reimer's laboratory) according to our established protocols. TNF, IL-6, IL-1, IL-8 and C-reactive protein will be quantified using Milliplex Human Cytokine kits (Millipore, Billerica, MA). Plate reading will be provided as a fee-for service through Eve Technologies Inc. (Calgary, AB).
  • Cancer related Symptom Management [ Time Frame: At baseline (diagnosis) and then 3, 6, 9, 12 months post diagnosis & every week before and after class during the 12 week intervention ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Participants will complete the ESAS bi-weekly, before and after class. The ESAS is a valid and reliable assessment tool to evaluate the nine more common symptoms experienced by cancer patients (Chang et al., 2000).
  • Diet Behaviour - 3 Day food record [ Time Frame: At baseline (diagnosis) and 4 & 8 weeks, 3, 6, 9, 12 months post diagnosis. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The 3-Day Diet Record is said to be the most accurate for mean macronutrient content and appropriate for use in studies where subjects may consume a wide variety of foods (American Dietetics Association / Dietitians Canada, 2000). Participants are instructed to record their daily consumption over a period of three days, one of which must be a weekend day. Written instructions and a sample entry are provided to increase accuracy of the daily record.
  • Diet Behaviour: PG-SGA [ Time Frame: At baseline (diagnosis), each week during radiation treatment (6.5 weeks in duration), and 3, 6, 9, 12 months post diagnosis ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The PG-SGA assessment tool has been show to improve treatment outcomes, decrease side-effects, and improve weight-management in cancer patients, and therefore will be used weekly to assess and identify malnutrition among patients (McMahon et al., 2000; Doyle et al., 2006).
  • Health related Fitness Measures - Resting Heart Rate [ Time Frame: At baseline (diagnosis), and 3, 6, 9, 12 months post diagnosis. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Resting heart rate will be measured by palpating the radial artery and taking a 15 second count as per the CPAFLA protocol (CPAFLA, 2003).
  • Health Related Fitness Outcome - Blood Pressure [ Time Frame: At baseline (diagnosis), and 3, 6, 9, 12 months post diagnosis. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    A resting blood pressure (mmHg) will be measured in duplicate on the left arm using a sphygmomanometer and stethoscope using standardized procedures (CPAFLA, 2003).
  • Health Related Fitness Outcome - 6 minute walk test [ Time Frame: At baseline (diagnosis), and 3, 6, 9, 12 months post diagnosis. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The six-minute walk test (6MWT) will be used to assess changes in functional aerobic capacity. Using the standardized protocol, participants will be asked to walk as far as they can around a 400-meter track for six minutes [43]. The point reached at 6 minutes will be marked and measured to the nearest 0.5 meter. Rating of perceived exertion (Borg scale) will be completed immediately after completion of the functional aerobic capacity test.
  • Health Related Fitness Outcome - Grip Strength [ Time Frame: At baseline (diagnosis) and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post diagnosis. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Muscular strength will be assessed using a combined grip strength of the right and left hands will also be assessed using a hand dynamometer. A sum will be determined in kilograms from the best score of 2 trials recorded for each hand according to the CPAFLA protocol.
  • Health Related Fitness Outcome - Lower Body Strength [ Time Frame: At baseline (diagnosis), and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post diagnosis ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Lower body strength will be assessed using a 30-second sit to stand test. The number of times participants can stand from a seated position in 30-second will be examined.
  • Health Related Fitness Outcome - Flexibility [ Time Frame: At baseline (diagnosis) and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post diagnosis ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Flexibility will be assessed by a trunk forward flexion sit-and-reach test using a Wells-Dillon flexometer. The test will follow a standard protocol, with two trials allowed and the highest score to the nearest 0.5 cm recorded.
  • Health Related Fitness Outcome - Balance [ Time Frame: At baseline (diagnosis), and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post diagnosis. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Balance will be assessed using a static balance test. The test requires the participant to balance on one foot and then the other as long as they can (length of time to a maximum of 45 seconds) while standing on a 2.54 by 2.54 by 30.5 cm base using a standardized protocol, reported by Fleishman.
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Exercise and Nutrition for Head and Neck Cancer Patients
Exercise and Nutrition for Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Patient Oriented, Clinic-Supported Randomized Controlled Trial

Research on physical activity and nutrition interventions aimed at positively impacting symptom management, treatment-related recovery and quality of life has largely excluded head and neck cancer populations. This translates into a lack of clinical programming available for these patient populations. Head and neck cancer patients deal with severe weight loss, with upwards of 70% attributed to lean muscle wasting, leading to extended recovery times, decreased quality of life (QoL), and impaired physical functioning. To date, interventions to address body composition issues have focused solely on diet, despite findings that nutritional therapy alone is insufficient to mitigate changes. A combined physical activity and nutrition intervention, that also incorporates important educational components known to positively impact behaviour change, is warranted for this population. Pilot work suggests that there is large patient demand and clinic support from the health care professionals for a comprehensive program. Therefore, the purpose of the present study is to examine the impact of timing of a 12-week PA and nutrition intervention (either during or following treatment) for HN cancer patients on body composition, recovery, serum inflammatory markers and quality of life. In addition, the investigators will examine the impact of a 12-week maintenance program, delivered immediately following the intervention, on adherence, patient-reported outcomes (i.e., management of both physical and psychosocial treatment-related symptoms and side-effects), as well as return to work. The investigators hypothesize that (1) patients who are randomized to the intervention at treatment start will experience improved symptom management and decreased lean body composition changes, directly improving recovery and QoL; (2) patients who receive a maintenance support program will have better long-term adherence and therefore superior treatment-related symptom management, physical and psychosocial functioning; and (3) return to work indices will improve and healthcare utilization costs will be lower in the participants who receive the immediate intervention (vs. delayed) as well as in those who receive the maintenance program (vs. no maintenance). This research will facilitate advancements in patient wellness, survivorship, and autonomy, and carve the path for a physical activity and wellness education model that can be implemented in other cancer centers.

Not Provided
Interventional
Not Provided
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
Cancer of Head and Neck
  • Behavioral: Lifestyle Intervention
    Participants in the Lifestyle Intervention will receive a 12-week individualized exercise and dietary program based on their exercise assessment and dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan results, will attend twice weekly group exercise classes, and perform their individualized at-home program an additional two times per week. In addition, participants will be required to attend six education sessions during the 12-week intervention.
  • Behavioral: Maintenance Intervention
    Patients randomized to receive the Maintenance Program Intervention following treatment will receive a Survivorship Care Plan outlining their physical activity, dietary, and health behaviour progress throughout the program, future goals, individualized maintenance strategies, and optional drop-in exercise sessions.
  • Experimental: Immediate Lifestyle Intervention - Maintenance Program
    Patients will receive a 12-week lifestyle program during treatment. Patients will also receive maintenance support following the 12-week program.
    Interventions:
    • Behavioral: Lifestyle Intervention
    • Behavioral: Maintenance Intervention
  • Experimental: Immediate Lifestyle Intervention - No Maintenance Program
    Patients will begin the 12-week lifestyle intervention during treatment. Patients will not receive a maintenance support following the 12-week intervention.
    Intervention: Behavioral: Lifestyle Intervention
  • Experimental: Delayed Lifestyle Intervention - Maintenance Program
    Patients will receive a 12-week lifestyle intervention program following treatment (12 weeks after diagnosis). Patients will then receive maintenance support following the 12-week program.
    Interventions:
    • Behavioral: Lifestyle Intervention
    • Behavioral: Maintenance Intervention
  • Experimental: Delayed Lifestyle Intervention - No Maintenance Program
    Patients will receive a 12-week lifestyle intervention program following treatment completion (12 weeks following diagnosis). Patients will not receive maintenance support following the 12-week program.
    Intervention: Behavioral: Lifestyle Intervention
Capozzi LC, Lau H, Reimer RA, McNeely M, Giese-Davis J, Culos-Reed SN. Exercise and nutrition for head and neck cancer patients: a patient oriented, clinic-supported randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2012 Oct 2;12:446. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-446.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruiting
80
December 2014
August 2014   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Over 18 Years of Age
  • Has received a diagnosis of nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer
  • Will receive radiation as part of treatment plan
  • Able to walk without assistance
  • Received clearance for exercise from treating oncologist
  • Lives in Calgary, Alberta area
  • Can speak and write English
  • Is interested in participating in the study
Both
18 Years and older
No
Contact: Lauren C Capozzi, PhD Student 403-975-3344 lcapozzi@ucalgary.ca
Contact: S. Nicole Culos-Reed, PhD 403-210-8482 nculosre@ucalgary.ca
Canada
 
NCT01681654
ENHANCE10001991
No
Dr. Nicole Culos-Reed, University of Calgary
University of Calgary
Alberta Cancer Foundation
Principal Investigator: Nicole Culos-Reed, PhD University of Calgary
Study Director: Lauren C Capozzi, PhD Student University of Calgary
Principal Investigator: Harold Lau, MD Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary
Principal Investigator: Raylene Reimer, PhD University of Calgary
University of Calgary
September 2012

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP