Efficacy of Telbivudine With or Without add-on Tenofovir According to Roadmap Strategy Compare With Entecavir (TETRA)
| Tracking Information | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | April 27, 2012 | ||||||||
| Last Updated Date | April 30, 2012 | ||||||||
| Start Date ICMJE | April 2012 | ||||||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | December 2013 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
HBV DNA non-detectability [ Time Frame: Week 48 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] Low detection limit of HBV DNA is 50 IU/mL |
||||||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||||
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01588912 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | ||||||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||||||
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | Efficacy of Telbivudine With or Without add-on Tenofovir According to Roadmap Strategy Compare With Entecavir | ||||||||
| Official Title ICMJE | A Randomized, Prospective, Multicenter, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Telbivudine With or Without add-on Tenofovir According to Roadmap Strategy Compare With Entecavir in HBeAg-positive Chronic Hepatitis B Patients | ||||||||
| Brief Summary | Oral antiviral drugs which can be given to patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B include Lamivudine, Clevudine, Adefovir, Telbivudine, Entecavir and Tenofovir. 2009 American Association for the Study of Liver Disease (AASLD) Treatment Guidelines and 2009 European association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) Treatment Guidelines recommend the administration of Entecavir or Tenofovir with high potency and low resistance. Lamivudine has low antiviral potency and high incidence of mutation in long-term administration compared to Entecavir or Tenofovir. Clevudine causes the elevated creatinine kinase (CK), side effects including myositis/myopathy and much mutation in the long-term administration. Globe study demonstrated Telbivudine had more excellent antiviral potency than Lamivudine, which was also comparable to or higher than Entecavir or Tenofovir. Nevertheless, the choice of treatment drugs can be limited due to the mutation rate of 25% for 2 years. However, the analysis of Globe study results showed that 2-year treatment progress was very good in patient who showed virologic response at 24 weeks after the initiation of treatment and that high antiviral potency and low mutation rate were observed when the Telbivudine roadmap strategy (in the event that virologic response is shown at 24 weeks, telbivudine monotherapy is maintained and in the event that virologic response is not shown, tenofovir add-on therapy is done) recently implemented and announced in 2011 Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) was applied. However, the study was single arm study, which restricted the comparison between Entecavir and Tenofovir monotherapy groups. Therefore, this study intends to compare the anti-viral effect and mutation rate between Entecavir 0.5mg monotherapy group and Telbivudine roadmap strategy group in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B through a randomized study. |
||||||||
| Detailed Description | 104 treatment-naïve patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B who fulfill the inclusion criteria will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Telbivudine 600mg monotherapy or Entecavir monotherapy with stratification before randomization according to presence of cirrhosis. For Telbivudine group, Telbivudine monotherapy or Tenofovir combined therapy will be done according to virologic response at 24 weeks and the primary study will be completed at Week 48 and treatment response will be analyzed. The treatment will be extended to Week 96 and the secondary analysis will be performed then. |
||||||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||||||
| Study Phase | Phase 4 | ||||||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
||||||||
| Condition ICMJE | Chronic Hepatitis B | ||||||||
| Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||||||
| Study Arm (s) |
|
||||||||
| Publications * | Not Provided | ||||||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Recruiting | ||||||||
| Estimated Enrollment ICMJE | 104 | ||||||||
| Estimated Completion Date | December 2014 | ||||||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | December 2013 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||||||
| Gender | Both | ||||||||
| Ages | 18 Years and older | ||||||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||||||||
| Contacts ICMJE |
|
||||||||
| Location Countries ICMJE | Korea, Republic of | ||||||||
| Administrative Information | |||||||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT01588912 | ||||||||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | CLDT600AKR07T | ||||||||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | No | ||||||||
| Responsible Party | Ki Tae Yoon, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital | ||||||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital | ||||||||
| Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||||||
| Information Provided By | Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital | ||||||||
| Verification Date | April 2012 | ||||||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||||||