Evaluation of the Effect of Psycho-oncological Intervention on Well-being of Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer on LHRH Analogs and Their Partners. A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study. (EXPEDIENT)

This study is currently recruiting participants.
Verified May 2013 by Ipsen
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Ipsen
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01562522
First received: March 21, 2012
Last updated: May 29, 2013
Last verified: May 2013

March 21, 2012
May 29, 2013
March 2012
August 2013   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
  • Sufficient interest in participation [ Time Frame: Up to the end of 16 weeks of the intervention period ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

    Determined by achievement of all of the following:

    • Number of participants (couples) recruited in 18 months in the participating centres. Achieved by recruitment of 50 couples.
    • Number of participants (couples) informed personally about the study consent to participate. To be achieved by 20% of couples.
    • Number of participants in group 1 that attend at least 70% of the sessions. To be achieved by 80% of participants.
  • Preliminary improvement in well-being [ Time Frame: After the intervention period of 16 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

    Improved - Group 1 improve more than group 2 on at least one of the outcome measures (includes HADS, EORTC QLQ-C30 or Maudsley Marital Questionnaire).

    Worsened - Group 1 should not worsen more than group 2 on any of the outcome measures.

  • Sufficient interest in participation [ Time Frame: Up to week 16 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

    Determined by achievement of all of the following:

    • Number of participants (couples) recruited in 18 months in the participating centres. Achieved by recruitment of 50 couples.
    • Number of participants (couples) informed personally about the study consent to participate. To be achieved by 20% of couples.
    • Number of participants in group 1 that attend at least 70% of the sessions. To be achieved by 80% of participants.
  • Preliminary improvement in well-being [ Time Frame: Week 16 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

    Improved - Group 1 improve more than group 2 on at least one of the outcome measures (includes HADS, EORTC QLQ-C30 or Maudsley Marital Questionnaire).

    Worsened - Group 1 worsened more than group 2 on any of the outcome measures.

Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01562522 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Change in quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30 scores [ Time Frame: Baseline (T0), after the intervention period of 16 weeks (T1) and 1 year (T2) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Change in quality of life questionnaire QLQ-PR25 scores [ Time Frame: Baseline(T0), after the intervention period of 16 weeks (T1) and 1 year (T2) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Difference in relationship satisfaction (Maudsley Marital Questionnaire) [ Time Frame: Baseline (T0), after the intervention period of 16 weeks (T1) and 1 year (T2) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Difference between level of depression and anxiety (HADS) [ Time Frame: Baseline (T0) and 1 year (T2) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores [ Time Frame: Baseline (T0), after the intervention period of 16 weeks (T1) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Change in quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30 scores [ Time Frame: Baseline, 16 weeks and 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Change in quality of life questionnaire QLQ-PR25 scores [ Time Frame: Baseline, week 16 and 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Difference in relationship satisfaction (Maudsley Marital Questionnaire) [ Time Frame: Baseline, week 16 and 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Difference between level of depression and anxiety (HADS) [ Time Frame: Baseline and 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores [ Time Frame: Baseline, 16 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Evaluation of the Effect of Psycho-oncological Intervention on Well-being of Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer on LHRH Analogs and Their Partners. A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.
Evaluation of the Effect of Psycho-oncological Intervention on Well-being of Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer on LHRH Analogs and Their Partners. A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.

The purpose of the protocol, is to assess the feasibility of conducting a larger trial to evaluate the effect of a psychological intervention on the well-being of patients on luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogs in the treatment of prostate cancer and their partners.

Not Provided
Interventional
Phase 2
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
Prostate Cancer
Other: Psychological counseling
Attendance at 7 group sessions, consisting of 5-6 couples, preceded by an intake consultation. Total intervention time: 16 weeks.
  • Experimental: Intervention group
    Intervention: Other: Psychological counseling
  • No Intervention: Control group
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruiting
50
April 2014
August 2013   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically confirmed diagnosis of prostate cancer on biopsy
  • Locally advanced or metastasised prostate cancer in need of hormonal treatment.
  • On LHRH analogue treatment for a minimum of 5 months (at inclusion)
  • Having a female partner
  • Patients and their partner are able to fill out questionnaires, attend group sessions and give consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Serious psychiatric difficulties
  • Life expectancy < 12 months
Male
Not Provided
No
Contact: Ipsen Recruitment Enquiries clinical.trials@ipsen.com
Netherlands
 
NCT01562522
A-95-52014-192
No
Ipsen
Ipsen
Not Provided
Study Director: Ilse Custers, MSc. Ipsen Farmaceutica BV
Ipsen
May 2013

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP