Home Human Papillomavirus or Pap Exam (HOPE) Study

This study is currently recruiting participants.
Verified March 2013 by Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
Information provided by:
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01550783
First received: February 17, 2012
Last updated: March 6, 2013
Last verified: March 2013

February 17, 2012
March 6, 2013
March 2012
August 2016   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
  • Sensitivity and specificity of self-collected at home human papillomavirus test with reflex cytology [ Time Frame: 5 Years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Compare whether cervical cancer screening of self-collected at home human papillomavirus test with reflex cytology is as effective as the currently recommended approach of cytology with reflex human papillomavirus testing.
  • Total estimated costs associated with cervical cancer screening [ Time Frame: 5 Years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Compare novel and standard care approaches with respect to over all cost-effectiveness (direct and in-direct costs)
  • Patient satisfaction with self-collected at home human papillomavirus test screening as measured by study questionnaires [ Time Frame: 5 Years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Compare novel and standard care approaches acceptability to patients
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01550783 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Sensitivity and specificity of self-collected at home human papillomavirus test with reflex cytology in human papillomavirus vaccinated and unvaccinated women less than 30 years old [ Time Frame: 5 Years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Compare novel and standard care arm performance in human papillomavirus vaccinated and unvaccinated women less than 30 years old
  • Sensitivity and specificity of human papillomavirus DNA genotyping and detection of aberrantly DNA methylated genes for referring high risk human papillomavirus positive women to colposcopy to identify cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2,3+ [ Time Frame: 5 Years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    In the novel arm, determine the potential utility of triage of high risk human papillomavirus positive women to colposcopy for identification of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2,3+ based on human papillomavirus DNA genotyping or detection of aberrantly DNA methylated genes
  • Total estimated costs associated with cervical cancer screening in human papillomavirus vaccinated and unvaccinated women less than 30 years old [ Time Frame: 5 Years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Compare novel and standard care arm cost-effectiveness in human papillomavirus vaccinated and unvaccinated women less than 30 years old
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Home Human Papillomavirus or Pap Exam (HOPE) Study
Cytology Versus at Home HPV Screening for Detection of CIN 2,3, CIS

Cervical cancer is caused by a virus called human papillomavirus (HPV). Despite the availability of HPV 16/18 vaccines, cervical cancer screening will need to continue as current vaccines do not protect against all HPV types, nor do they protect women already infected with HPVs against development of cervical cancer.

The investigators are doing this study to compare whether HPV testing (self-collected at home) is as effective as the currently recommended approach (Pap tests) for screening for cervical cancer. The investigators want to know if self-collected at home HPV testing is effective, cost-effective, and/or acceptable to patients.

Patients in this study will get either self-collected at home HPV testing or regular Pap test screenings. In the home HPV test group, if your HPV test is positive you will receive a Pap test. In the standard care group, if the patient's Pap test is abnormal you will receive an HPV test. Any cervical cancer screening follow-up examinations will be per currently recommended guidelines.

Based upon data in our clinical practice at the University of Washington clinics and our previous research studies, the investigators expect that self-collected at home HPV testing will be effective, cost-effective, and acceptable to patients.

Not Provided
Interventional
Not Provided
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Cervical Cancer
  • Precancerous Condition
Procedure: Self-collected at home HPV testing
Self-collected at home HPV testing followed by in-clinic cytology for triage of HR-HPV positive women
  • Experimental: Novel: 21-29yo, no HPV vacc.
    Intervention: Procedure: Self-collected at home HPV testing
  • Experimental: Novel: 21-29yo, HPV vacc.
    Intervention: Procedure: Self-collected at home HPV testing
  • Experimental: Novel: >=30yo
    Intervention: Procedure: Self-collected at home HPV testing
  • No Intervention: Standard Care: 21-29yo, no HPV vacc.
  • No Intervention: Standard Care: 21-29yo, HPV vacc.
  • No Intervention: Standard Care: >=30yo
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruiting
5400
August 2016
August 2016   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female sex
  • >=21 years old
  • Able to provide informed consent in English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Male sex
  • Have had hysterectomy
  • Currently pregnant
  • Received treatment of cervical dysplasia with LEEP, cone biopsy, laser procedure or cryotherapy within two years
  • Immunocompromised (positive HIV test, transplant recipient, received chemotherapy for cancer, or taking immunosuppressant drugs)
  • Decisionally impaired adults requiring a legally authorized representative
Female
21 Years and older
Yes
Not Provided
United States
 
NCT01550783
7489, R01CA157469, UWCC-7489, FHCRC-7489
Yes
Not Provided
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Principal Investigator: Nancy B Kiviat, M.D. University of Washington
Principal Investigator: Shalini Kulasingam, Ph.D. University of Minnesota - Clinical and Translational Science Institute
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
March 2013

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP