Use of PrineoTM (Dermabond Protape) Skin Adhesive for Wound Closure Following Abdominoplasty

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Daryousch Parvizi, MD, Medical University of Graz
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01544556
First received: February 29, 2012
Last updated: March 5, 2012
Last verified: February 2012

February 29, 2012
March 5, 2012
July 2009
February 2012   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Not Provided
Not Provided
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01544556 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Use of PrineoTM (Dermabond Protape) Skin Adhesive for Wound Closure Following Abdominoplasty
Use of PrineoTM (Dermabond Protape) Skin Adhesive for Wound Closure Following Abdominoplasty: An Open, Prospective, Controlled, Randomized Clinical Study

Abdominoplasty is one of the most commonly performed procedures in plastic surgery. The appearance of the scar is a major factor contributing to the aesthetic outcome of the procedure and depends largely on the technique of wound closure. The investigators routinely used resorbable subcutaneous sutures and resorbable intracutaneous sutures for this closure. To overcome the potential detrimental effects of sutures in skin closure, surgical adhesives were introduced as a new technology. The new PrineoTM wound closure system was created to combine the effectiveness of 2-octyl-cyanoacrylate (Dermabond TM) together with a self-adhering mesh to make closure of long skin incisions even more safe and reliable. PrineoTM has the potential to offer a patient several benefits over traditional wound closure with sutures.A patient treated with Prineo™ can shower immediately following a procedure because the product forms a watertight barrier over the incision. PrineoTM can be easily removed, often with less pain than is sometimes associated with suture removal, after the natural wound healing process is complete (approximately 12 to 25 days). Other benefits are that it forms a microbial barrier and provides even distribution of tension across the length of the incision to ensure wound edge approximation throughout the wound healing process. Furthermore, it reduces subcuticular closure time as compared to subcuticular suturing.

However, these potential advantages have not been proven until now, as the methods used to assess the aesthetic outcome were not reproducible in most assessments, and none of these studies assessed patient satisfaction.1-3 Moreover, none was performed in a plastic surgical patient population. For these reasons, the investigators prospectively studied the results of wound closure after abdominoplasty with randomized use of PrineoTM and conventional suturing to assess the possible difference in outcome between these two methods.

Abdominoplasty is one of the most commonly performed procedures in plastic surgery. The appearance of the scar is a major factor contributing to the aesthetic outcome of the procedure and depends largely on the technique of wound closure. The new PrineoTM wound closure system was introduced to combine the effectiveness of 2-octyl-cyanoacrylate (Dermabond TM) together with a self-adhering mesh.Fifty-two women and 8 men aged between 21 and 65 years scheduled for abdominoplasty were included in the study. Two weeks postoperatively, the wounds were examined and graded according to the Hollander Cosmesis Scale. At 3- and 6-month follow-up, the aesthetic outcome of the abdominal scar was evaluated with the Vancouver Scar Scale. Six months postoperatively, the patients were further asked to score their part of the Patient Scar Assessment Scale.The Hollander Cosmesis Scale indicated a significantly more favourable overall result with PrineoTM at 2 weeks after surgery. The Vancouver Scar Scale demonstrated a better cosmetic outcome in favour of PrineoTM 3 and 6 months after surgery The Patient Scar Assessment Scale scores 6 months after surgery indicated that the patients noted significantly less pain, thickness and irregularity with PrineoTM.Based on the investigators results, the investigators conclude that PrineoTM is a safe and effective substitute for superficial skin closure, with good cosmetic results and no increase in wound complications. The use of PrineoTM decreases operative times and enhances patients' postoperative comfort

Observational
Observational Model: Case Control
Time Perspective: Prospective
Not Provided
Not Provided
Probability Sample

Fifty-two women and 8 men aged between 21 and 65 years scheduled for abdominoplasty were included in the study.

Late Effects of Open Wound
Not Provided
  • Prineo
    An open, prospective, controlled, randomized clinical Study
  • Steristrips
    An open, prospective, controlled, randomized clinical Study
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
1
February 2012
February 2012   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

Exclusion Criteria:

peripheral vascular disease; insulin dependent diabetes mellitus; current intake of systemic steroids; known HIV-positive or other immunocompromised status; known or suspected allergy or sensitivity to cyanoacrylate, formaldehyde, tapes or adhesives; personal or family history of keloid or hypertrophic scar formation; or additional surgical procedures performed in the same surgical session in the same anatomical region. -

Both
18 Years to 65 Years
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Austria
 
NCT01544556
Prineo 1, Prineo2
Not Provided
Daryousch Parvizi, MD, Medical University of Graz
Medical University of Graz
Not Provided
Not Provided
Medical University of Graz
February 2012

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP