Comparison of Contrast Agents During CT Angiography (Visipaque)

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
General Electric
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01534975
First received: February 14, 2012
Last updated: January 28, 2013
Last verified: January 2013

February 14, 2012
January 28, 2013
January 2012
January 2013   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
image quality [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Attenuation (HU) in the ascending aorta, left ventricular (LV) cavity and LV myocardium (septal and lateral wall) and image noise, standard deviation (SD) of aorta, will be measured, as well as mean change in heart rate over administration time and scan time.
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01534975 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
safety [ Time Frame: 3 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]

We will also assess adverse events and complications, including delayed reactions among the four contrast agent groups.

Measurements include: image quality, pt comfort, HR, contrast enhancement, re-image, cost, pt satisfaction, AEs including DARs.

Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Comparison of Contrast Agents During CT Angiography
A Prospective, Single-Center Double-Blind Randomized Study in Subjects Undergoing Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) Examination (VISIPAQUE Randomized Study)

The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of a certain contrast agent (iodixanol) to two other commonly used contrast agents called Iopamidol (Isovue) and iohexol (Omnipaque), on heart and kidney safety in patients undergoing a cardiac CT angiogram. The investigators will evaluate whether iodixanol 320 (Visipaque®), an iso-osmolar agent, is better tolerated (flushing, injection site pain/warmth, headache, nausea) and provides equal image quality compared with iohexol 350 (Omnipaque®) and Isovue 370 during 64-slice multidetector computed tomography angiography (MDCTA). A fourth group (Visipaque 270) will be included, using low radiation dose technology during acquisition, to evaluate image quality, tolerability, and contrast enhancement compared to both Visipaque 320 and Omnipaque and Isovue. In addition to image quality, tolerability, and contrast enhancement, the investigators will evaluate heart rate, adverse events, reimaging, costs, and patient satisfaction among all four cohorts.

The study will recruit 400 participants already undergoing CT angiography and consent and randomize them to one of four groups. Each of the possible contrast agents used are commonly used for CT angiography, so the primary risk is loss of confidentiality and being asked questions about tolerability. All other facets of the study (3 lead ECG, beta blockade, nitroglycerine use, CT angiography and contrast administration) are standard of care and being done for clinical uses.

Not Provided
Observational
Observational Model: Cohort
Time Perspective: Cross-Sectional
Not Provided
Not Provided
Probability Sample

undergoing CT angiography for diagnostic purposes

Contrast Enhancement on Cardiac CT
Not Provided
  • Iodixanol 320
    group 1
  • iohexol 350
    group 2
  • iopamidol 370
    group 3
  • iodixanol 270
    group 4
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
360
January 2013
January 2013   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

Subjects may be included in the study if they meet all of the following criteria:

  1. The subject is over 18 years old.
  2. Subject scheduled to undergo a contrast-enhanced CCTA examination
  3. The subject has no contra-indication to receiving iodinated contrast administration (allergy, renal insufficiency).
  4. The subject has provided signed and dated informed consent

Exclusion criteria:

Subjects must be excluded from participating in this study if they meet the following criteria:

  1. Subjects have known contra-indication to contrast administration:

    • Renal insufficiency as defined by GFR < 50
    • Known contrast allergy
  2. Pregnant or possibly pregnant subjects will be excluded -Women of childbearing potential will undergo urine pregnancy test prior to CT scanning.
Both
18 Years and older
Yes
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States
 
NCT01534975
Visipaque
No
Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute
Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute
General Electric
Not Provided
Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute
January 2013

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP