Novel Approaches in Preventing and Limiting Events III Trial (NAPLES III): Bivalirudin in High-risk Bleeding Patients (NAPLESIII)
| Tracking Information | |
|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | November 1, 2011 |
| Last Updated Date | November 3, 2011 |
| Start Date ICMJE | January 2010 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | June 2012 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
The primary end point will be the rate of major bleeding, defined according to Acuity criteria. [ Time Frame: Within 24 hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ] Major bleeding are defined as intracranial, intraocular, or retroperitoneal haemorrhage, clinically overt blood loss resulting in a decrease in haemoglobin of more than 3 g/dL, any decrease in haemoglobin of more than 4 g/dL, or transfusion of 2 or more units of packed red blood cells or whole blood. |
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current |
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01465503 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site |
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current |
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided |
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided |
| Descriptive Information | |
| Brief Title ICMJE | Novel Approaches in Preventing and Limiting Events III Trial (NAPLES III): Bivalirudin in High-risk Bleeding Patients |
| Official Title ICMJE | Bivalirudin in Patient at High Risk of Bleeding Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions. |
| Brief Summary | Bleeding occurring during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI has now emerged as one of the most common complication of PCI and adversely affect in-hospital, short- and long-term outcome.As bivalirudin proved its effectiveness in decreasing haemorrhagic events during PCI, its administration may be advocated in subjects deemed at high risk of bleeding.Objective of the present trial is to compare the safety and effectiveness of procedural use of bivalirudin in comparison to unfractionated heparin (UFH) in patients undergoing PCI deemed at high risk of procedural bleeding. |
| Detailed Description | Antithrombotic and antiplatelet therapies have been the focus of extensive clinical investigations over the past 2 decades. In PCI settings all therapies inhibiting coagulation and primary hemostasis may limit ischaemic event rates, but are associated with an increased risk of bleeding. Retrospective and registry data indicates that haemorrhage is associated with mortality in patients undergoing PCI, emphasizing the potential importance of minimizing bleeding, as well as ischemic events, bleeding has now emerged as one of the most common complication of PCI. Major bleeding and blood transfusion have been strongly associated with increased rates of in-hospital and late mortality, MI and repeat revascularization after PCI. Also minor bleeding, although represent a complication significantly less dangerous than major haemorrhages, are associated with prolonged hospitalization, increased cost and adversely affect short- and long-term outcome. UFH is the most commonly used anticoagulant drug during PCI. Bleeding events during PCI may be in part due to the use of this drug. Bivalirudin (The Medicine's Co., Parsippany, NJ) is a synthetic direct thrombin inhibitor approved for patients with stable and unstable coronary syndromes undergoing PCI. Favourable properties of bivalirudin may minimize bleeding. Several clinical and procedural factors have been evaluated to identify patients exposed to a higher risk of hemorrhages. Nikolsky et al. have developed a risk score (validated on REPLACE-1 and REPLACE-2 data) based on clinical variable useful to predict the incidence of major peri-procedural bleeding after contemporary PCI using the femoral approach. The clinical variables considered into this algorithm are age >55 years (integer score 4 for every 10 years over 55), female gender (integer score 3), eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (integer score 2), pre-existing anaemia (integer score 2), and administration of low-molecular weight heparin within 48 hours (integer score 2). Global risk score 0-1 anticipated a major bleeding rate of 1.3%; a risk score 2-6 was associated with a 1.8% risk of major bleeding; a risk score 7-9 associated with a 2.7% risk if major bleeding, whereas a risk score >=10 was associated with a 5% rate of major bleeding. Our hypothesis is that bivalirudin, compared with UFH, may provide significant benefits in term of bleeding in the selected population of patients deemed at high risk of bleeding. Our aim is thus to prove, in a double-centres, randomized, blind controlled trial enrolling patients undergoing PCI via the femoral approach, the efficacy in term of haemorrhagic events and, secondarily, the effectiveness and safety of bivalirudin by means of the study drug vs UFH. Sample size estimation: in this high risk population we expect a rate of major and minor bleeding of 6% for the UFH group vs a 2% event rate in the bivalirudin group. Aiming for a 0.05 alpha and 0.80 power, a total of 752 patients will need to be enrolled (376 patients per group). This will be increased by about 10% (leading to a total of 830 patients) because of considerable uncertainty about expected end-point rates. |
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional |
| Study Phase | Phase 3 |
| Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator) Primary Purpose: Prevention |
| Condition ICMJE | Bleeding |
| Intervention ICMJE |
|
| Study Arm (s) |
|
| Publications * |
|
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|
| Recruitment Information | |
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Enrolling by invitation |
| Estimated Enrollment ICMJE | 830 |
| Estimated Completion Date | December 2012 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | June 2012 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
4.2.2 Angiographic inclusion criteria • Angiographic evidence of a de novo lesion > 50% requiring intervention Exclusion Criteria:
|
| Gender | Both |
| Ages | 18 Years and older |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No |
| Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects |
| Location Countries ICMJE | Italy |
| Administrative Information | |
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT01465503 |
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | NCTCM02 |
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | Yes |
| Responsible Party | Carlo Briguori, Clinica Mediterranea |
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | Clinica Mediterranea |
| Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided |
| Investigators ICMJE | Not Provided |
| Information Provided By | Clinica Mediterranea |
| Verification Date | November 2011 |
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|