| September 1, 2011 |
| January 17, 2013 |
| September 2011 |
| September 2016 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Progression-free survival [ Time Frame: 1 year after transplantation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] To compare the 1-year progression-free survival between the 2 prophylactic arms (Tracolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil and Tracolimus/Sirolimus) in the whole group of patients and separately in those conditioned with Fluradabine/TBI or Fluradabine plus Busulfan and anti-thymocyte globulin. |
| Same as current |
| Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01428973 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site |
- Relapse rate; nonrelapse mortality and overall survival [ Time Frame: 1, 2 and 5 years after transplantation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
To compare relapse rate, nonrelapse mortality, and overall survival in the 2 prophyltic arms (Tracolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil and Tracolimus/Sirolimus) 1, 2 and 5 years after hematopietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in the whole group of patients and separately in those conditioned with Fluradabine/TBI or Fluradabine plus Busulfan and anti-thymocyte globulin.
- Progression free survival [ Time Frame: 2 and 5 years after transplantation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
To compare progression-free survival in the 2 phrophylactic arms (Tracolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil and Tracolimus/Sirolimus) 2 and 5 years after HSCT, in the whole group of patients and separately in those conditioned with Fluradabine/TBI or Fluradabine plus Busulfan and anti-thymocyte globulin.
- Engraftment [ Time Frame: 1 year after transplantation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
To compare hematopoietic (whole blood and T cell chimerism) engraftment and to evaluate the 1-year incidence of graft rejection in the 2 prophylctic arms (Tracolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil and Tracolimus/Sirolimus), in the whole group of patients and separately in those conditioned with Fluradabine/TBI or Fluradabine plus Busulfan and anti-thymocyte globulin.
- Acute GVDH [ Time Frame: 6 months after transplantation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
To compare the 6-mo incidence of grades II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD in the 2 prophylactic arms (Tracolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil and Tracolimus/Sirolimus), in the whole group of patients and separately in those conditioned with Fluradabine/TBI or Fluradabine plus Busulfan and anti-thymocyte globulin.
- Chronic GVDH [ Time Frame: 1 year after transplantation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
To compare the 1-yr incidence of chronic GVHD in the phrophylactic 2 prophylactic arms (Tracolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil and Tracolimus/Sirolimus), in the whole group of patients and separately in those conditioned with Fluradabine/TBI or Fluradabine plus Busulfan and anti-thymocyte globulin.
- Immunological reconstitution [ Time Frame: 3 mo, 6 mo, 1 yr, 2 yrs and 5 yrs after transplantation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
To compare the quality and timing of immunologic reconstitution in the 2 prophylactic arms (Tracolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil and Tracolimus/Sirolimus),in the whole group of patients and separately in those conditioned with Fluradabine/TBI or Fluradabine plus Busulfan and anti-thymocyte globulin.
- Infection [ Time Frame: 1 year after transplantation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
To compare the 1-yr incidences of bacterial, fungal and viral infections in the 2 prophylactic arms (Tracolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil and Tracolimus/Sirolimus), in the whole group of patients and separately in those conditioned with Fluradabine/TBI or Fluradabine plus Busulfan and anti-thymocyte globulin.
|
- Relapse rate; nonrelapse mortality and overall survival [ Time Frame: 1, 2 and 5 years after transplantation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
To compare relapse rate, nonrelapse mortality, and overall survival in the 2 prophyltic arms (Tracolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil and Tracolimus/Sirolimus) 1, 2 and 5 years after HSCT in the whole group of patients and separately in those conditioned with Fluradabine/TBI or Fluradabine plus Busulfan and anti-thymocyte globulin.
- Progression free survival [ Time Frame: 2 and 5 years after transplantation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
To compare progression-free survival in the 2 phrophylactic arms (Tracolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil and Tracolimus/Sirolimus) 2 and 5 years after HSCT, in the whole group of patients and separately in those conditioned with Fluradabine/TBI or Fluradabine plus Busulfan and anti-thymocyte globulin.
- Engraftment [ Time Frame: 1 year after transplantation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
To compare hematopoietic (whole blood and T cell chimerism) engraftment and to evaluate the 1-year incidence of graft rejection in the 2 prophylctic arms (Tracolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil and Tracolimus/Sirolimus), in the whole group of patients and separately in those conditioned with Fluradabine/TBI or Fluradabine plus Busulfan and anti-thymocyte globulin.
- Acute GVDH [ Time Frame: 6 months after transplantation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
To compare the 6-mo incidence of grades II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD in the 2 prophylactic arms (Tracolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil and Tracolimus/Sirolimus), in the whole group of patients and separately in those conditioned with Fluradabine/TBI or Fluradabine plus Busulfan and anti-thymocyte globulin.
- Chronic GVDH [ Time Frame: 1 year after transplantation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
To compare the 1-yr incidence of chronic GVHD in the phrophylactic 2 prophylactic arms (Tracolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil and Tracolimus/Sirolimus), in the whole group of patients and separately in those conditioned with Fluradabine/TBI or Fluradabine plus Busulfan and anti-thymocyte globulin.
- Immunological reconstitution [ Time Frame: 3 mo, 6 mo, 1 yr, 2 yrs and 5 yrs after transplantation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
To compare the quality and timing of immunologic reconstitution in the 2 prophylactic arms (Tracolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil and Tracolimus/Sirolimus),in the whole group of patients and separately in those conditioned with Fluradabine/TBI or Fluradabine plus Busulfan and anti-thymocyte globulin.
- Infection [ Time Frame: 1 year after transplantation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
To compare the 1-yr incidences of bacterial, fungal and viral infections in the 2 prophylactic arms (Tracolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil and Tracolimus/Sirolimus), in the whole group of patients and separately in those conditioned with Fluradabine/TBI or Fluradabine plus Busulfan and anti-thymocyte globulin.
|
| Not Provided |
| Not Provided |
| |
| Minitransplants With HLA-matched Donors : Comparison Between 2 GVHD Prophylaxis Regimens |
| Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation From HLA-matched Donors After Reduced-intensity Conditioning: a Phase II Randomized Study Comparing 2 GVHD Prophylaxis Regimens |
The present project is a multicenter phase II trail aiming at comparing which of the two postgrafting immunosuppressive regimens proposed in this study will be best suited to prevent graft-versus-host disease (GVDH).
The immunosuppressive regimens will consist of: Tacrolimus plus Mycophenolate Mofetil or Tacrolimus plus Sirolimus. Before grafting patients will undergo two reduced-intensity conditioning: Fludarabine/total body irradiation (TBI) or Fludarabine+Busulfan+anti-thymocyte globulin. The hypothesis is that the Tacrolimus plus Sirolimus regimen will be associated with better progression-free survival due to a lower incidence of relapse/progression. |
| Not Provided |
| Interventional |
| Phase 2 |
Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Prevention |
- Graft-Versus-Host Disease
- Hematological Malignancies
|
- Drug: Mycophenolate mofetil
Tablets. For HLA-identical sibling donors:15 mg/kg t.i.d from day 0 to day 28. For alternative donor: 15 mg/kg, from day 0 to day 42.
Other Name: CellCept
- Drug: Sirolimus
Tablets. 6 mg loading dose on day −3, followed by (1)-2 mg daily to a target trough level of 5 to 10 ng/mL. Full doses will be given until day 100 (sibling recipients) or 180 (alternative donor recipients). Doses will then be progressively tapered to be definitely discontinued by day 180 (sibling donors) or 365 (alternative donor recipients) in the absence of GVHD.
Other Name: Rapamune
|
- Active Comparator: Arm 1
GVHD prophylaxis: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) orally from the evening of day 0 through day 28 (sibling recipients) or day 42 (alternative donor recipients) at the dose of 15 mg/kg t.i.d. Tacrolimus (Tac)given orally at the dose of 0.06 mg/kg bid starting on day -3. The dose adapted according to through whole blood values following standard procedures (between 10 and 15 ng/ml the first 28 days and between 5-10 ng/ml thereafter). Full doses given until day 100 (sibling recipients) or 180 (alternative donor recipients). Doses tapered to be definitely discontinued by day 180 (sibling donors) or 365 (alternative donor recipients) in the absence of GVHD.
Intervention: Drug: Mycophenolate mofetil
- Experimental: Arm 2
GVHD prophylaxis: Tacrolimus, orally (0.06 mg/kg) bid starting on day -3. The dose adapted between 5-10 ng/ml. Full doses until day 60 (sibling recipients) or day 100 (alternative donor recipients). Doses tapered to be definitely discontinued by day 100 (sibling donors) or 180 (alternative donor recipients) in the absence of GVHD. Sirolimus 6 mg loading dose on day −3, followed by (1)-2 mg daily to a target trough level of 5 to 10 ng/mL. Full doses until day 100 (sibling recipients) or 180 (alternative donor recipients). Doses will then be progressively tapered to be definitely discontinued by day 180 (sibling donors) or 365 (alternative donor recipients) in the absence of GVHD
Intervention: Drug: Sirolimus
|
| Not Provided |
| |
| Recruiting |
| 200 |
| September 2017 |
| September 2016 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
Inclusion Criteria:
Hematological malignancies confirmed histologically and not rapidly progressing:
- Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in complete remission (CR) (defined as ≤ 5% marrow blasts and absence of blasts in the peripheral blood);
- Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with ≤ 5% marrow blasts and absence of blasts in the peripheral blood;
- Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP);
- Myeloproliferative neoplasms not in blast crisis and not with extensive marrow fibrosis;
- Acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL)in CR;
- Multiple myeloma not rapidly progressing;
- chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL);
- Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (aggressive NHL should have chemosensitive disease);
- Hodgkin's disease with chemosensitive disease;
- 10/10 HLA-A, -B, -C, DRB1 and DQBI allele-matched donor fit to/willing to donate PBSC.
Clinical situations:
Theoretical indication for a standard allotransplant, but not feasible because:
- Age > 50 yrs;
- Unacceptable end organ performance;
- At the physician's decision;
- Patient's refusal.
- Indication for a standard auto-transplant: perform mini-allotransplantation 2-6 months after standard autotransplant.
Other inclusion criteria:
- Male or female; fertile patients must use a reliable contraception method;
- Age ≤ 75 yrs (children of any age are allowed in the protocol);
- Informed consent given by patient or his/her guardian if of minor age.
Exclusion Criteria:
|
| Both |
| 16 Years to 75 Years |
| No |
|
|
| Belgium |
| |
| NCT01428973 |
| TJB1016P1 |
| No |
| Yves Beguin, University Hospital of Liege |
| University Hospital of Liege |
- AZ Sint-Jan AV
- Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen (ZNA)
- Jules Bordet Institute
- University Hospital, Gasthuisberg
- AZ-VUB
- Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain
- University Hospital, Antwerp
- Cliniques Universitaires de Mont-Godinne
- Jolimont Hospital Haine Saint Paul
- Queen Fabiola Children's University Hospital
- University Hospital, Ghent
- H.-Hart Hospital Roeselare-Menen
|
| Principal Investigator: |
Frédéric Baron, MD; PhD |
University of Liège |
|
|
| University Hospital of Liege |
| January 2013 |