Centrifugation vs. Multiple-pass Hemofiltration of the Residual Cardiopulmonary Bypass Volume
| Tracking Information | |
|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | June 7, 2011 |
| Last Updated Date | March 29, 2013 |
| Start Date ICMJE | March 2011 |
| Primary Completion Date | September 2012 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01416792 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site |
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided |
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided |
| Descriptive Information | |
| Brief Title ICMJE | Centrifugation vs. Multiple-pass Hemofiltration of the Residual Cardiopulmonary Bypass Volume |
| Official Title ICMJE | Outcomes & Biochemical Parameters Following Cardiac Surgery: Effects of Transfusion of Residual Blood Using Centrifugation and Multiple-Pass Hemofiltration |
| Brief Summary | Traditional cardiac surgery requires patient connection to the Cardiopulmonary Bypass (CPB) apparatus which takes over the function of the heart and lungs while the surgeon performs the necessary surgery. The residual blood left in the CPB equipment (1.5-2.0 L) is centrifuged and washed leaving only red blood cells (RBCs) suspended in a saline solution. The RBCs are reinfused into the patient as needed by the anesthesiologist. The main problem with this technique is that many of the important components of the blood such as plasma proteins and clotting factors are discarded through cell washing. This study will explore a novel method (multiple-pass hemofiltration) of processing the residual pump blood which will allow the patient to receive their own whole blood with minimum waste of important components. The newer method of processing the residual pump volume has also been termed off-line modified ultrafiltration (off-line MUF) and is similar to the process that the kidneys use to filter the blood. It is hypothesized that multiple-pass hemofiltration of the residual CPB volume will reduce the occurrence of inflammatory responses, preserve plasma proteins, and decrease allogenic blood exposure and improve clinical outcomes as compared to centrifugation. |
| Detailed Description | This study is being performed because the traditional method of recovery of the residual volume of blood from the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit involves centrifugation and washing of whole blood with a saline solution. This process is sufficient for the recovery of red blood cells however; it results in the discarding of other important components of the blood. The removal of white blood cells, plasma proteins and clotting factors may result in an increased risk of a adverse outcomes during the post-operative period. The new technique our team wants to investigate returns a greater proportion of the patients' whole blood for reinfusion. Our study objectives are to compare the two techniques and determine which technique produces the safest most reliable method of blood processing to help the patient have a smooth, short, transfusion free post-operative period in the intensive care unit (ICU). |
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional |
| Study Phase | Not Provided |
| Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Condition ICMJE |
|
| Intervention ICMJE |
|
| Study Arm (s) | Experimental: Multiple-pass hemofiltration
Interventions:
|
| Publications * | Not Provided |
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|
| Recruitment Information | |
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Completed |
| Enrollment ICMJE | 61 |
| Completion Date | October 2012 |
| Primary Completion Date | September 2012 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
| Gender | Both |
| Ages | 40 Years to 75 Years |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No |
| Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects |
| Location Countries ICMJE | Canada |
| Administrative Information | |
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT01416792 |
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | Multiple-pass hemofiltration |
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | No |
| Responsible Party | Erick McNair, University of Saskatchewan |
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | University of Saskatchewan |
| Collaborators ICMJE | Saskatoon Health Region |
| Investigators ICMJE | Not Provided |
| Information Provided By | University of Saskatchewan |
| Verification Date | September 2011 |
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|