Violence and Stress Assessment (ViStA) Project to Improve Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Management in Primary Care

This study is currently recruiting participants.
Verified December 2012 by RAND
Sponsor:
Collaborators:
Clinical Directors Network
Georgetown University
University of Washington
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
RAND
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01401101
First received: August 26, 2010
Last updated: December 12, 2012
Last verified: December 2012

August 26, 2010
December 12, 2012
June 2010
November 2012   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
  • PTSD symptoms [ Time Frame: 0 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • PTSD symptoms [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • PTSD symptoms [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01401101 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • perceived barriers to health care [ Time Frame: 0 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • resilience to stress [ Time Frame: 0 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    10-item version of the Connor-Davidson Resilience scale (CD-RISC)
  • use of and satisfaction with health care services [ Time Frame: 0 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • health-related quality of life [ Time Frame: 0 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    SF-12 mental and physical functioning
  • perceived barriers to health care [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • perceived barriers to health care [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • resilience to stress [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • resilience to stress [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • use of and satisfaction with health care services [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • use of and satisfaction with health care services [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • health-related quality of life [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • health-related quality of life [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Violence and Stress Assessment (ViStA) Project to Improve Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Management in Primary Care
Improving PTSD Management in Primary Care

The purpose of this study is to conduct a randomized trial of a Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Care Management (PCM) program to detect, treat, and improve PTSD treatment processes and outcomes in patients seeking primary care from CHCs and evaluate its effectiveness on improving the processes and outcomes of care for PTSD.

Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is a common problem seen in primary care but the identification and management of PTSD is not routine and would benefit from new approaches. Efforts must overcome patient-, clinician-, and system-level barriers, such as patients' fear of stigma, clinician's time constraints for dealing with psychological issues, gaps in clinician treatment knowledge, and difficulty arranging for referrals to mental health specialists.

Unlike mood disorders such as depression, little is known about improving care for PTSD in primary care settings. However, previous experience for treating depression, as well as existing guidelines for addressing PTSD in primary care, provide evidence that effective interventions exist and that multi-faceted interventions are more effective than a single-component approaches.

In this project, the RAND Corporation, Clinical Directors Network Inc., Georgetown University Department of Psychiatry, and University of Washington will implement and evaluate a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a PTSD Care Management (PCM) intervention to detect, treat, and improve PTSD treatment processes and health outcomes in patients seeking primary care from Community Health Centers (CHCs) in Northeastern USA.

The three specific aims are to:

  1. Evaluate the effectiveness of the PCM intervention compared to a Treatment-as-Usual (TAU) control in reducing PTSD and other mental health symptoms, and improving patients' health-related quality-of-life.
  2. Assess the success of the PCM intervention implementation and,
  3. Examine the direct costs of the PCM intervention compared to the TAU control treatment.

The PCM intervention was developed using principles of Community-Based Participatory Research (CPBR) methods in CHCs that provide care to the underserved, and is tailored to the settings and populations we will study. This intervention is multi-faceted and includes components and strategies implemented through a Care Manager (CM) to overcome patient-, clinician-, and system-level barriers.

There are six PCM intervention components: 1) patient education, 2) patient screening and written feedback of screening information to primary care clinicians, 3) clinician education on practice guidelines , 4) structured feedback between primary care and mental health clinicians, 5) continuity of patient care, and 6) a resource guide detailing available community services where the CHC has established reciprocal referrals. All of the intervention components will be implemented through the CM, except for the clinician education component, which will combine onsite and online continuing medical education (CME)-accredited sessions. The TAU condition will consist of only the clinician education and patient screening without written feedback.

Patients will be interviewed during a pre-screening stage to determine PTSD status. A total of 400 of the patients who screen positive will be randomly assigned to the PCM intervention or TAU.

Data will be collected from several sources. First, patients will be assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 months via interviews using validated instruments. Second, CMs will compile monthly aggregate data on patient management for patients assigned to the PCM program. Third, CHC staff will be asked for their feedback about their experiences with implementing the program at the end of the study. The study team will use these data to estimate the direct costs of implementing the PCM program.

Interventional
Phase 2
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic
  • Other: quality improvement
    Care Manager (CM) intervention
    Other Name: practice-based quality improvement
  • Other: Treatment-as-Usual
    The TAU condition will consist of only the clinician education and patient screening without written feedback.
    Other Name: Usual care
  • Experimental: PTSD Care Management (PCM)
    There are six PCM intervention components: 1) patient education, 2) patient screening and written feedback of screening information to primary care clinicians, 3) clinician education on practice guidelines , 4) structured feedback between primary care and mental health clinicians, 5) continuity of patient care, and 6) a resource guide detailing available community services where the CHC has established reciprocal referrals. All of the intervention components will be implemented through the CM, except for the clinician education component, which will combine onsite and online continuing medical education (CME)-accredited sessions.
    Intervention: Other: quality improvement
  • Placebo Comparator: Treatment-as-Usual (TAU)
    The TAU condition will consist of only the clinician education and patient screening without written feedback.
    Intervention: Other: Treatment-as-Usual
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruiting
500
August 2013
November 2012   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Has PTSD
  • Has a scheduled or walk-in appointment with a participating PCC
  • Speaks English of Spanish
  • Is between 18 and 65 years old
  • Expects to receive care in the CHC during the next year

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acutely ill and cannot participate in a discussion
  • Does not understand the information
Both
18 Years to 65 Years
Yes
Contact: Lisa S. Meredith, PhD 310-393-0411 ext 7365 seidel@rand.org
Contact: Andrea Cassells, MPH 212-382-0699 ext 227 ACass@cdnetwork.org
United States
 
NCT01401101
1R01MH082768
No
RAND
RAND
  • Clinical Directors Network
  • Georgetown University
  • University of Washington
Principal Investigator: Lisa S Meredith, PhD RAND Corporation
RAND
December 2012

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP