Dexamethasone Versus Depo Medrol in Lumbar Epidurals
| Tracking Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | July 15, 2011 | ||||
| Last Updated Date | July 20, 2011 | ||||
| Start Date ICMJE | September 2009 | ||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | December 2015 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
To determine if one medication is better at relieving pain than the other. [ Time Frame: 12 wk post injection ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] Subjects will be asked to return at 2 wks, 6 wks and 12 weeks the above time points to complete outcome measurements questionnaires and undergo a neurological examinationk, the 12 weeks outcome should show improvement s/p injection |
||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01397552 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | ||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | Dexamethasone Versus Depo Medrol in Lumbar Epidurals | ||||
| Official Title ICMJE | A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Compare the Effects of Dexamethasone Versus Depo-Medrol When Used in Lumbar Epidural Injections | ||||
| Brief Summary | Comparison of Dexamethasone versus Depo Medrol when used in lumbar epidural injections will be conducted on subjects that have not had previous injections or have not had an injection in the last 12 months. Subjects must be receiving one level injection and not had prior surgery at that level. |
||||
| Detailed Description | Central Epidural Steroid Injections (ESI) and Selective Nerve Root Blocks (SNRB) are often used for the non-surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniations and lumbar radiculitis (radiating pain). Numerous authors have reported on their value in treating patients with radicular pain with the possibility of delaying or even obviating the need for surgery in well-selected patients.. There are two well-performed clinical studies in the peer-reviewed medical literature that specifically examined the crossover rates to surgery for patients who received either ESI or SNRB. In a prospective study, Buttermann et al. found a crossover rate to surgery for patients with symptomatic disc herniations treated with ESI of 54% (27/50) . In a separate prospective study, Riew et al. followed patients after selective nerve root blocks and found that similarly 53% (29/55) of their patients had avoided surgery after a selective nerve root block during their initial follow-up of 13-28 months. In a later study that followed that same population, 76% (16/21) of those patients who had avoided surgery at one year still avoided surgery at a minimum of five year follow-up. Epidural steroid injections are a common treatment option for patients with disc herniations and radiating leg pain. They have been used for low back problems since 1922 and are still an integral part of the non-surgical management of a variety of spine related problems. The goal of the injection is reduction in pain, increased quality of life and increased function. Most practitioners will agree that, while the effects of the injection tend to be temporary-providing relief from pain for one week up to one year-an epidural can be very beneficial for a patient during an acute episode of back and/or leg pain. Importantly, an injection can provide sufficient pain relief to allow a patient to progress with a rehabilitative stretching and exercise program. Many previous studies on epidural injections did not include use of fluoroscopy or xray to verify proper placement of the medication despite the fact that fluoroscopic guidance is routinely used today. Additionally, many studies do not classify patients according to diagnosis and tend to "lump" different types, sources of pain together. Commonly used steroid preparations include betamethasone, triamcinolone, dexamethasone and methylprednisolone. Unfortunately, there is no consensus regarding the most effective medication, dose, volume or frequency used for ESIs. This investigator-initiated study is being conducted to compare the effects of epidural injections on low back pain when using either dexamethasone or methylprednisolone (Depo-Medrol). The physicians listed would like to compare these two medications to assess if one is more effective than the other. Both medications are FDA approved and are not experimental. Dexamethasone is the only nonparticulate corticosteroid, has a rapid onset that acts as an anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressant. Depo-Medrol is a synthetic steroid (cortisone) medication which also acts as an anti-inflammatory when physicians administer an epidural for relief of low back pain. |
||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||
| Study Phase | Not Provided | ||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator) |
||||
| Condition ICMJE |
|
||||
| Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||
| Study Arm (s) |
|
||||
| Publications * | Not Provided | ||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Enrolling by invitation | ||||
| Estimated Enrollment ICMJE | 100 | ||||
| Estimated Completion Date | December 2015 | ||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | December 2015 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||
| Gender | Both | ||||
| Ages | 21 Years and older | ||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||||
| Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||
| Location Countries ICMJE | United States | ||||
| Administrative Information | |||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT01397552 | ||||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | IRB 5824 | ||||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | No | ||||
| Responsible Party | Suehun Ho, MD, Assistant Professor, Upstate Medical University | ||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | State University of New York - Upstate Medical University | ||||
| Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||
| Information Provided By | State University of New York - Upstate Medical University | ||||
| Verification Date | July 2011 | ||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||