Effects of Lacosamide on Human Motor Cortex Excitability: a Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
UCB, Inc.
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Nicolas Lang, University of Kiel
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01382017
First received: June 23, 2011
Last updated: August 28, 2012
Last verified: August 2012

June 23, 2011
August 28, 2012
June 2011
August 2012   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
TMS measures of cortical excitability [ Time Frame: within 24h after intake of study medication ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measurements included resting motor thresholds (RMT) and active motor thresholds (AMT), the intensity to evoke MEP of ∼1mV peak-to-peak amplitude (SI1mV), short-interval intracortical inhibition/intracortical facilitation (SICI/ICF), long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI), short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF), recruitment curves, MEP under tonic activation (aMEP), and cortical silent period (CSP), and MEP changes in response to short trains of repetitive TMS.
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01382017 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Effects of Lacosamide on Human Motor Cortex Excitability: a Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study
Not Provided

This study has been designed to explore dose-depended effects of lacosamide (LCM) on motor cortex excitability with TMS in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial in young healthy human subjects, and to compare the pattern of excitability changes induced by LCM with those of carbamazepine (CBZ). LCM selectively enhances slow inactivation of voltage-gated sodium channel, and, in contrast to CBZ, does not affect steady-state fast inactivation (Errington et al., 2006). The enhancement of slow inactivation of sodium channels by LCM is a novel manner to modulate sodium channels and leads to normalization of activation thresholds and a reduced pathophysiological hyper-responsiveness, thereby effectively controlling neuronal hyperexcitability without affecting physiological activity (Beyreuther et al., 2007). Therefore, it is thought that LCM, compared to CBZ, will be better tolerated in clinical settings while being as or even more effective in controlling seizure activity. On the basis of the results from nonhuman studies, it is hypothesized that the TMS profile of LCM will be distinguishable from that of CBZ. CBZ, like other 'classical' sodium channel blockers such as phenytoin, predominantly demonstrated elevated TMS motor thresholds indicating reduced neuronal membrane excitability, without developing significant changes of synaptic intracortical inhibition and facilitation (Ziemann et al., 1996; Chen et al., 1997; Lee et al., 2005). Because of its novel mode of action it can only be speculated which TMS parameters LCM might affect. For example, more than exclusively affecting neuronal membrane excitability, LCM could possibly also affect inhibitory mechanisms such as short- and long-latency intracortical inhibition (Valls-Sole et al., 1992; Kujirai et al., 1993). This would in line with other well-tolerated modern antiepileptic drugs (Ziemann et al., 1996; Reis et al., 2002; Lang et al., 2006).

Not Provided
Interventional
Not Provided
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Pharmacodynamics Study
Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment
Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator)
Primary Purpose: Basic Science
Healthy Male Volunteers
  • Drug: Lacosamide
    Lacosamide 200 or 400 mg
  • Drug: Placebo
    Placebo
  • Drug: Carbamazepine
    Carbamazepine 600 mg
  • Placebo Comparator: Placebo
    Placebo arm
    Intervention: Drug: Placebo
  • Experimental: Lasosamide 200
    Lacosamide 200 mg
    Intervention: Drug: Lacosamide
  • Experimental: Lacosamide 400
    Lacosamide 400 mg
    Intervention: Drug: Lacosamide
  • Active Comparator: Carbamazepine 600
    Carbamazepine 600 mg
    Intervention: Drug: Carbamazepine
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
18
August 2012
August 2012   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • healthy
  • male
  • right-handed
  • aged 18-45 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • cardiac pacemaker
  • metal implants in the head
  • intake of any medication
  • previous neurologic, psychiatric, or chronic internal diseases
  • pregnancy or breastfeeding; drug, nicotine, or alcohol abuse
  • known or expected intolerance to soy beans, peanuts, LCM or CBZ; abnormal ECG with prolonged PQ-interval
  • participation in another clinical trial within the previous 8 weeks
Male
18 Years to 45 Years
Yes
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Germany
 
NCT01382017
LCM-TMS-2010
Yes
Nicolas Lang, University of Kiel
University of Kiel
UCB, Inc.
Principal Investigator: Nicolas Lang, PD Dr. med. Christian-Albrechts University Kiel, Germany
University of Kiel
August 2012

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP