| April 20, 2011 |
| September 17, 2012 |
| March 2011 |
| June 2012 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Change from baseline in mean volume voided per micturition [ Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] |
| Same as current |
| Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01340027 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site |
- Change from baseline in mean number of micturitions/24 hours [ Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Change from baseline in mean number of incontinence episodes/24 hours [ Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Change from baseline in mean volume voided per micturition at secondary time points [ Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Change from baseline in mean number of urgency incontinence episodes/24 hours [ Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Change from baseline in mean number of urgency episodes (grade 3 and/or 4)/24 hours (using the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale (PPIUS) scale) [ Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Change from baseline in mean level of urgency [ Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Change from baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) [ Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Change from baseline in symptom bother and health related quality of life scores as assessed by the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) [ Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Change from baseline in scores as assessed by European Quality of Life questionnaire in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire [ Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Change from baseline in scores as assessed by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire [ Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Change from baseline in the subject's assessment of Treatment Satisfaction (TS-VAS) [ Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Change from baseline in mean number of incontinence pads used/24 hours [ Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Change from baseline in mean number of nocturia episodes/24 hours [ Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
|
| Same as current |
| Not Provided |
| Not Provided |
| |
| A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Mirabegron and Solifenacin Alone and in Combination for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder |
| A Randomized, Double-Blind, Factorial, Parallel-Group, Active and Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Dose-Ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Six Dose Combinations of Solifenacin Succinate and Mirabegron Compared to Mirabegron and Solifenacin Succinate Monotherapies in the Treatment of Overactive Bladder. |
The purpose of this study is to examine how well two medicines (solifenacin succinate and mirabegron) work in the treatment of bladder problems over a 12-week period. |
| Not Provided |
| Interventional |
| Phase 2 |
Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Factorial Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
- Urinary Bladder, Overactive
- Urinary Bladder Diseases
- Urologic Diseases
- Urological Manifestations
- Signs and Symptoms
|
- Drug: Solifenacin succinate and Mirabegron
oral
- Drug: Mirabegron
oral
Other Name: YM178
- Drug: Solifenacin succinate
oral
Other Name: Vesicare
- Drug: Placebo
oral
|
- Experimental: 1. Solifenacin low dose and Mirabegron low dose
Intervention: Drug: Solifenacin succinate and Mirabegron
- Experimental: 2. Solifenacin low dose and Mirabegron high dose
Intervention: Drug: Solifenacin succinate and Mirabegron
- Experimental: 3. Solifenacin medium dose and Mirabegron low dose
Intervention: Drug: Solifenacin succinate and Mirabegron
- Experimental: 4. Solifenacin medium dose and Mirabegron high dose
Intervention: Drug: Solifenacin succinate and Mirabegron
- Experimental: 5. Solifenacin medium dose
Intervention: Drug: Solifenacin succinate
- Experimental: 6. Solifenacin high dose and Mirabegron low dose
Intervention: Drug: Solifenacin succinate and Mirabegron
- Experimental: 7. Solifenacin high dose and Mirabegron high dose
Intervention: Drug: Solifenacin succinate and Mirabegron
- Active Comparator: 8. Solifenacin low dose
Intervention: Drug: Solifenacin succinate
- Active Comparator: 9. Solifenacin high dose
Intervention: Drug: Solifenacin succinate
- Active Comparator: 10. Mirabegron low dose
Intervention: Drug: Mirabegron
- Active Comparator: 11. Mirabegron high dose
Intervention: Drug: Mirabegron
- Placebo Comparator: 12. Placebo
Intervention: Drug: Placebo
|
| Not Provided |
| |
| Completed |
| 2092 |
| June 2012 |
| June 2012 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria at Visit 1/Screening:
- Subject is breastfeeding, pregnant or intends to become pregnant during the study. The pregnancy test (β-HCG in serum) at Screening must be negative in women of childbearing potential;
- Female subjects of childbearing potential and not using a highly effective method of birth control during the study and for 30 days after final study drug administration.
- Male subjects (unless surgically sterile) with female spouses/partners who are of childbearing potential, and not using a barrier method of contraception during the study and for 30 days after final study drug administration. In addition, female spouses/partners of male subjects and who are of childbearing potential should also use a highly effective method of birth control during the study and for 30 days after final study drug administration. Highly effective methods of birth control are defined as those, alone or in combination, that result in a low failure rate (i.e. less than 1% per year) when used consistently and correctly.
- Subject has significant Post-void residual (PVR) volume (> 150 mL);
- Subject has significant stress incontinence or mixed stress/urgency incontinence where stress is the predominant factor as determined by the Investigator (for female subjects confirmed by the cough provocation test);
- Subject has a neurological cause for detrusor overactivity;
- Subject has an indwelling catheter or practices intermittent self-catheterization;
- Subject has diabetic neuropathy;
- Subject has chronic inflammation such as interstitial cystitis, bladder stones, previous pelvic radiation therapy or previous or current malignant disease of the pelvic organs;
- Subject has had previous lower urinary tract or pelvic floor surgery (except cystoscopy);
- Subject has had intravesical treatment in the past 12 months with e.g., botulinum toxin, resiniferatoxin, capsaicin;
- Subject has uncontrolled narrow angle glaucoma, urinary or gastric retention, severe ulcerative colitis or Crohn's Disease, toxic megacolon, myasthenia gravis or any other condition which makes the use of anticholinergics contraindicated;
- Subject has clinically significant cardiovascular or cerebrovascular diseases within 6 months prior to Screening, such as myocardial infarction, uncontrolled angina, significant ventricular arrhythmias, heart failure and stroke;
- Subject is receiving current non-drug treatment including electro-stimulation therapy (with the exception of a bladder training program or pelvic floor exercises which started more than 30 days prior to Screening);
- Subject is using medications intended to treat OAB or prohibited medications. Subject is excluded if using restricted medications under conditions different to those specified in the "Concomitant Medication" section;
- Subject has known or suspected hypersensitivity to solifenacin succinate, mirabegron or any of their excipients;
- Subject has any significant neurological disease or defect affecting bladder function (e.g., neurogenic bladder, systemic or central neurological disease such as multiple sclerosis [MS] and Parkinson's disease);
- Subject has severe hypertension which is defined as a sitting average systolic blood pressure ≥ 180 mmHg and/or an average diastolic blood pressure ≥ 110 mmHg;
Exclusion Criteria at Visit 2/Placebo Run-In:
- Subject has evidence of a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) (urine culture containing > 100,000 cfu/mL). The subject can be enrolled into the study after successful treatment of the UTI (confirmed by a laboratory result of negative urine culture). However, the subject must be re screened if the initial screening visit (Visit 1b) was > 28 days;
- Subject has a QT interval > 450 ms or is at risk of QT prolongation (e.g., family history of long QT syndrome, hypokalaemia) or is on drug treatment known to be associated with QT prolongation;
- Subject has clinically significant abnormalities on the 12 lead Electrocardiogram (ECG);
- Subject has serum creatinine > 150 µmol/L, AST and/or ALT > 2x upper limit of normal (ULN), γ-GT > 3x ULN, or total bilirubin > 2x ULN, as assessed in Screening samples;
Exclusion Criteria at Visit 3/Baseline:
- Subject had an average total daily urine volume > 3000 mL as recorded in the micturition diary period;
- Subject has severe hypertension which is defined as a sitting average systolic blood pressure ≥ 180 mmHg and/or an average diastolic blood pressure ≥ 110 mmHg.
|
| Both |
| 18 Years and older |
| No |
| Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects |
| Belarus, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Ukraine, United Kingdom |
| |
| NCT01340027 |
| 178-CL-100, 2010-020601-32 |
| Yes |
| Astellas Pharma Inc ( Astellas Pharma Europe BV ) |
| Astellas Pharma Europe BV |
| Not Provided
| Study Director: |
Study Physician |
Astellas Pharma Europe BV |
|
| Principal Investigator: |
Principal Investigator |
Bristol Urological Institute |
|
|
| Astellas Pharma Inc |
| September 2012 |