Prevention of Ovulation Achieved by Single Intra-vaginal Administration of Levogel as Compared to Oral LNG
| Tracking Information | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | January 28, 2011 | ||||||||||||
| Last Updated Date | February 12, 2013 | ||||||||||||
| Start Date ICMJE | January 2011 | ||||||||||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | February 2014 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||||||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Comparison of LNG gel and oral LNG on follicle rupture [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] The main objective of the study is to compare the effect of LNG gel and oral LNG on follicle rupture as assessed by ultrasound. |
||||||||||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||||||||
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01286948 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | ||||||||||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Evaluate effect of single intra-vaginal administration [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] The secondary objectives are to evaluate the effect of single intra-vaginal administration of LNG gel or oral LNG on the:
|
||||||||||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||||||||
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||||||
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||||||||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | Prevention of Ovulation Achieved by Single Intra-vaginal Administration of Levogel as Compared to Oral LNG | ||||||||||||
| Official Title ICMJE | A Randomized, Cross-over, Clinical Trial to Assess the Prevention of Ovulation Achieved by Single Intra-vaginal Administration of 0.75 mg Levonorgestrel (LNG) Gel (Levogel) as Compared to 1.5 mg Oral LNG | ||||||||||||
| Brief Summary | It has been proposed that levonorgestrel (LNG) in a vaginal gel could be used as an 'on demand' contraceptive when used before coitus. Levonorgestrel was selected as it is a component of many approved oral contraceptive pills and also it is the active agent in Plan B, an FDA-approved regimen for emergency contraception (EC). In previous studies it was demonstrated that an LNG vaginal gel was absorbed and was effective in preventing follicular rupture. The overall proportion of cycles with lack of follicular rupture within 5 days of LNG administration or with ovulatory dysfunction (follicle rupture preceded by an inadequate LH surge) was 96% for LNG gel and 39% in the inert gel cycles (control group). |
||||||||||||
| Detailed Description | A dose of 0.75mg of LNG in a vaginal gel was shown to prevent ovulation in a higher percentage than what has been observed with oral LNG at the approved doses for EC of 1.5mg. Results from a study with a1.5 mg LNG oral dose or a single 0 ,75mg dose demonstrated that the proportion of cycles without follicle rupture or ovulatory dysfunction within 5 days was 86% and 79% respectively (Croxatto et al, 2004) , whereas lack of follicular rupture or the presencr of ovulatory dsyfunction was 96% with administration of a LNG gel formulation. In the group of women with follicle size ≥18mm the gel induced 50% ovulation suppression while oral LNG in previous studies blocked only 16% of ovulation in the same follicle size group . These encouraging results could be explained by higher bioavailability of LNG when administered vaginally. This comparison was made using historical data from another study; therefore this study will compare vaginal administration of LNG to oral in a direct cross-over comparative study. LNG is known to affect the cervical mucus by making it hostile to sperm penetration and its effect may appear after only a few hours following oral administration (Kesseru, 1984; Brache, unpublished observations). Application of LNG gel in the vagina close to the cervical os may exert a direct effect on the cervical mucus. The potential local action of LNG on the cervical mucus may be another important mechanism by which protection is conferred to women who do not experience ovulation suppression. An "on demand" precoital contraceptive is an attractive alternative to the post-coital emergency contraception currently available, especially due to the higher efficacy of this route of administration on ovulation suppression as compared with oral tablets of LNG. Should the present study confirm the superiority of vaginal administration of half the dose of the oral dose of LNG approved for emergency contraception, further development of that formulation and method would be warranted. |
||||||||||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||||||||||
| Study Phase | Phase 1 | ||||||||||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Subject) Primary Purpose: Prevention |
||||||||||||
| Condition ICMJE | Female Contraception | ||||||||||||
| Intervention ICMJE | Drug: Levonorgestrel (LNG) gel (Levogel) and oral LNG (Plan B)
This is a randomized study with a cross-over design comparing two single dose treatment sequences of either Levogel (LNG vaginal gel 0.750 mg/4g) or oral LNG (1.5mg). All women with a leading follicle diameter of ≥18 mm will be randomized to treatment with a single intra-vaginal application of LNG gel or oral LNG. After a washout cycle, the women will be crossed over to receive the other treatment and the study procedures will be repeated. |
||||||||||||
| Study Arm (s) |
|
||||||||||||
| Publications * | Not Provided | ||||||||||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||||||||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||||||||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Active, not recruiting | ||||||||||||
| Estimated Enrollment ICMJE | 20 | ||||||||||||
| Estimated Completion Date | February 2014 | ||||||||||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | February 2014 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||||||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||||||||||
| Gender | Female | ||||||||||||
| Ages | 21 Years to 39 Years | ||||||||||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | Yes | ||||||||||||
| Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||||||||||
| Location Countries ICMJE | Chile, Dominican Republic | ||||||||||||
| Administrative Information | |||||||||||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT01286948 | ||||||||||||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | Protocol # 441 | ||||||||||||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | Yes | ||||||||||||
| Responsible Party | Population Council | ||||||||||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | Population Council | ||||||||||||
| Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||||||||||
| Information Provided By | Population Council | ||||||||||||
| Verification Date | February 2013 | ||||||||||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||||||||||