Comparison Study of Neoadjuvant Paclitaxel Plus Carboplatin/Epirubicin Treatment in Triple-negative Breast Cancer
| Tracking Information | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | December 10, 2010 | ||||||||
| Last Updated Date | November 15, 2011 | ||||||||
| Start Date ICMJE | January 2008 | ||||||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | July 2012 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Pathology of specimens derived from the breast modified radical mastectomy/Breast-conserving surgery [ Time Frame: One week after the surgery ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ] After patients complete the neoadjuvant chemothreapy and receive the surguries,we can get their pathology ,and compare the pCR(pathological complete remission)rates of two amrs |
||||||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||||
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01276769 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | ||||||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
follow-up the patient every 3-6 months to obtain the 3 year-DFS(disease free survival ) and OS(overall survival ) [ Time Frame: we follow up the patients every 6 month ,up to 3 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ] | ||||||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||||
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | Comparison Study of Neoadjuvant Paclitaxel Plus Carboplatin/Epirubicin Treatment in Triple-negative Breast Cancer | ||||||||
| Official Title ICMJE | Phase IIb Trial of Paclitaxel Plus Carboplatin Versus Paclitaxel Plus Epirubicin as Neoadjuvant Treatment in Locally Advanced Triple-negative Breast Cancer | ||||||||
| Brief Summary | This study is to compare the effective of Paclitaxel combined with Epirubicin and Paclitaxel plus Carboplatin in the neoadjuvant treatment for TNBC. And the investigators hypothesized that paclitaxel combined with carboplatin is more sensitive to TNBC compared with Paclitaxel plus Epirubicin,this study will also have a look into the relation of BRCA1 mutation and sensitive to carboplatin. |
||||||||
| Detailed Description | It is know that triple-negative breast cancer(TNBC) is more aggressive than non-triple negative breast cancer in both pathological features and clinical prognosis,and there is no standard chemotherapy regimens especially for TNBC. NCCN guidelines recommends Paclitaxel or Epirubicin based regimens as the preferred regimens both for the adjuvant chemotherapy and the treatment of Recurrence and Metastatic breast cancer.The combination of these two drugs is considered as a strong arrangement and therefore,is common used in Triple negative breast cancer patients because of its poor prognosis. According to the results of some retrospective studies, platinum-based chemotherapy regimens showed a promising sensitive to Triple negative breast cancer patients compared with regimens without platinum. This study is to compare the effective of Paclitaxel combined with Epirubicin and Paclitaxel plus Carboplatin in the neoadjuvant treatment for TNBC. And the investigators hypothesized that paclitaxel combined with carboplatin is more sensitive to TNBC compared with Paclitaxel plus Epirubicin,this study will also have a look into the relation of BRCA1 mutation and sensitive to carboplatin. |
||||||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||||||
| Study Phase | Phase 2 | ||||||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Non-Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
||||||||
| Condition ICMJE | Triple Negative Breast Cancer | ||||||||
| Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||||||
| Study Arm (s) |
|
||||||||
| Publications * | Not Provided | ||||||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Recruiting | ||||||||
| Estimated Enrollment ICMJE | 80 | ||||||||
| Estimated Completion Date | July 2012 | ||||||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | July 2012 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||||||
| Gender | Female | ||||||||
| Ages | 18 Years to 70 Years | ||||||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||||||||
| Contacts ICMJE |
|
||||||||
| Location Countries ICMJE | China | ||||||||
| Administrative Information | |||||||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT01276769 | ||||||||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | LC2010A03 | ||||||||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | Yes | ||||||||
| Responsible Party | ZHANG Pin, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences | ||||||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences | ||||||||
| Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||||||
| Information Provided By | Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences | ||||||||
| Verification Date | November 2011 | ||||||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||||||