Study to Evaluate the Need of Needle Change for Application of Intramuscular, Subcutaneous and Intradermal Injection.
| Tracking Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | January 6, 2011 | ||||
| Last Updated Date | January 6, 2011 | ||||
| Start Date ICMJE | June 2009 | ||||
| Primary Completion Date | June 2009 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Change History | No Changes Posted | ||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | Study to Evaluate the Need of Needle Change for Application of Intramuscular, Subcutaneous and Intradermal Injection. | ||||
| Official Title ICMJE | Intramuscular and Subcutaneous Injections: is it Necessary to Have Needles Exchanged? | ||||
| Brief Summary | Comparing the pain intensity on a numeric scale (0-10) with intramuscular and subcutaneous injection between a retractable fixed syringe needle and the technique involving needle exchange; Comparing bruise formation following administration of insulin subcutaneous injections between RFS and the conventional technique. Method Study site A clinical trial was conducted in two medical-surgical units in a hospital in the period from June 15th to November 30th, 2009, after approval by the Ethics and Research Committee. Intervention In a group of patients the investigators used syringes with retractable fixed needle to administer subcutaneous and intramuscular injections. In the group of control, the investigators used the standard technique to administer medications. Population of study Patients were sequentially enrolled through a lottery system of exposure using random numbers kept in sealed, opaque envelopes. Sampling design and sample size Subcutaneous injection The sample size was based on the expected proportion of bruising following the injection. It was expected that 40% of patients would show bruising with the conventional technique and 20% with the technique under study for subcutaneous applications. With an alpha error of 5% (p = 0.05) and power of study of 80% (beta error of 20% or 0.2) 240 patients were included, 120 in each group. Intramuscular injection The sample size was based on the proportion of patients with moderate to severe pain. It was considered normal the incidence of moderate to severe pain in 30% with a needle exchange, whereas it was considered an increase of up to 40% with the retractable fixed needle. The investigators included 500 patients in each group. |
||||
| Detailed Description | Not Provided | ||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||
| Study Phase | Not Provided | ||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Supportive Care |
||||
| Condition ICMJE |
|
||||
| Intervention ICMJE | Device: needle exchange
Comparing the pain intensity on a numeric scale (0-10) with intramuscular and subcutaneous injection between a retractable fixed syringe needle and the technique involving needle exchange; Comparing bruise formation following administration of insulin subcutaneous injections between retractable fixed needle and the conventional technique. |
||||
| Study Arm (s) | Not Provided | ||||
| Publications * | Lamblet LC, Meira ES, Torres S, Ferreira BC, Martucchi SD. Randomized clinical trial to assess pain and bruising in medicines administered by means of subcutaneous and intramuscular needle injection: is it necessary to have needles changed? Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2011 Sep-Oct;19(5):1063-71. English, Portuguese, Spanish. | ||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Completed | ||||
| Enrollment ICMJE | 1240 | ||||
| Completion Date | November 2009 | ||||
| Primary Completion Date | June 2009 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||
| Gender | Both | ||||
| Ages | 18 Years and older | ||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||||
| Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||
| Location Countries ICMJE | Brazil | ||||
| Administrative Information | |||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT01271608 | ||||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | CAAE-0203.0.028.000-08 | ||||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | Yes | ||||
| Responsible Party | Luiz Carlos Ribeiro Lamblet/ Nurse, Hospital M Boi Mirim | ||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | Hospital M'Boi Mirim | ||||
| Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||
| Information Provided By | Hospital M'Boi Mirim | ||||
| Verification Date | June 2009 | ||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||