Accuracy of Spybite Forceps When Compared to Conventional Sampling Methods
This study is currently recruiting participants.
Verified March 2013 by University of Florida
Sponsor:
University of Florida
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
University of Florida
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01227382
First received: October 18, 2010
Last updated: March 13, 2013
Last verified: March 2013
| Tracking Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | October 18, 2010 | ||||
| Last Updated Date | March 13, 2013 | ||||
| Start Date ICMJE | November 2006 | ||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | September 2013 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
accuracy of SpyBite biopsy forceps [ Time Frame: at scheduled Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) visit approximately 4-5 hours. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] The accuracy of the Spybite Biopsy forceps will be compared to cytology brush and RJ3 biopsy forcep sampling of any stricture found on Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) |
||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01227382 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | ||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | Accuracy of Spybite Forceps When Compared to Conventional Sampling Methods | ||||
| Official Title ICMJE | Prospective Evaluation of the Accuracy of Spybite Biopsy Forceps for the Tissue Diagnosis of Lesion of the Pancreatobiliary System. ( Part of the "The Clinical Utility of Cholangioscopy and Pancreatoscopy in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pancreaticobiliary Disorders" Study) | ||||
| Brief Summary | The investigators are evaluating the use of a SpyBite biopsy forceps for tissue diagnosis when compared to standard biopsy techniques. |
||||
| Detailed Description | Not Provided | ||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Observational | ||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Observational Model: Case-Crossover Time Perspective: Prospective |
||||
| Target Follow-Up Duration | Not Provided | ||||
| Biospecimen | Not Provided | ||||
| Sampling Method | Non-Probability Sample | ||||
| Study Population | Those subjects who have a bile duct or pancreatic duct stricture who are scheduled to undergo an ERCP with Cholangiopancreatoscopy |
||||
| Condition ICMJE | Accuracy of Tissue Diagnosis | ||||
| Intervention ICMJE | Procedure: Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)with cholangiopancreatoscopy and stricture sampling
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)with cholangiopancreatoscopy and sampling of stricture with SpyBite biopsy forceps, cytology brush and RJ3biopsy forceps |
||||
| Study Group/Cohort (s) | ERCP with Cholangiopancreatoscopy and stricture sampling
Those subjects who have been scheduled for an Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with Cholangiopancreatoscopy for evaluation of a bile duct ot pancreatic duct stricture
Intervention: Procedure: Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)with cholangiopancreatoscopy and stricture sampling |
||||
| Publications * | Draganov PV, Chauhan S, Wagh MS, Gupte AR, Lin T, Hou W, Forsmark CE. Diagnostic accuracy of conventional and cholangioscopy-guided sampling of indeterminate biliary lesions at the time of ERCP: a prospective, long-term follow-up study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Feb;75(2):347-53. | ||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Recruiting | ||||
| Estimated Enrollment ICMJE | 25 | ||||
| Estimated Completion Date | September 2013 | ||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | September 2013 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||
| Gender | Both | ||||
| Ages | 18 Years and older | ||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||||
| Contacts ICMJE |
|
||||
| Location Countries ICMJE | United States | ||||
| Administrative Information | |||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT01227382 | ||||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | SpyBite | ||||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | No | ||||
| Responsible Party | University of Florida | ||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | University of Florida | ||||
| Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||
| Information Provided By | University of Florida | ||||
| Verification Date | March 2013 | ||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||