A Pilot Study of Fludarabine Plus Cyclophosphamide in Refractory Severe Aplastic Anemia
| Tracking Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | August 20, 2010 | ||||
| Last Updated Date | February 8, 2013 | ||||
| Start Date ICMJE | August 2010 | ||||
| Primary Completion Date | July 2012 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
The primary objective is to evaluate the safety and activity profile of Flu/Cy in SAA.-The primary safety endpoint will be toxicity profile in the 6 months following Flu/Cy-The primary efficacy endpoint is response rate at 6 months | ||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01187017 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | ||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Secondary endpoints will also be evaluated for the study to include: (a) hematologic response at 3 and 12 months and yearly thereafter; (b) relapse (c) clonal evolution to PNH, myelodysplasia or acute leukemia; (e) survival. | ||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | A Pilot Study of Fludarabine Plus Cyclophosphamide in Refractory Severe Aplastic Anemia | ||||
| Official Title ICMJE | A Pilot Study of Fludarabine Plus Cyclophosphamide in Refractory Severe Aplastic Anemia | ||||
| Brief Summary | Background:
Objectives: - To determine the safety and effectiveness of the combination of fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide in treating severe aplastic anemia that has not responded to initial treatments. Eligibility: - Individuals at least 2 years of age who have severe aplastic anemia that has not improved after treatment with horse ATG or both horse and rabbit ATG. Design:
|
||||
| Detailed Description | Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a life-threatening bone marrow failure disorder characterized by pancytopenia and a hypocellular bone marrow. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) offers the opportunity for cure in 70 percent of patients, but most patients are not suitable candidates for this treatment modality due to advanced age, comorbidities or lack of a histocompatible donor. For these patients, comparable long-term survival is attainable with immunosuppressive treatment (IST) with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) and cyclosporine (CsA). However, approximately 1/3 of patients do not show blood count improvement after ATG/CsA and are considered to have refractory disease. Furthermore, analysis of our own extensive clinical data suggests that poor blood count responses to a single course of ATG (nonrobust responders), even when transfusion-independence is achieved, predicts a markedly worse prognosis compared to those who achieve a robust hematologic improvement (protocol 90-H-0146) . In patients who are refractory to horse ATG (h-ATG) and do not have a histocompatible sibling, alternative donor (AD) HSCT or a repeat course of IST are options. Registry data suggests that outcome for AD HSCT in SAA is not as favorable compared to a matched sibling HSCT with long-term survival at about 40-50 percent and a higher risk of graft-versus-host disease. However, in recent smaller retrospective studies survival after AD HSCT in children rivals that of a sibling transplant when an unrelated donor who matches in 10 HLA loci (matched unrelated donor) is available. With repeat IST, response rates with rabbit anti-thymocyte has varied from 22 percent up to 77 percent. Our experience in refractory SAA (protocol 03-H-0249) is that rabbit ATG + CsA and alemtuzumab are equally efficacious as salvage therapies, with a response rate of about 30 percent for each treatment. For the 20-30 percent of patients who remain refractory after 2 courses of treatment, further courses of IST have been of limited value with responses observed only occasionally. In addition, efforts to improve initial IST in treatment-na ve patients (addition of mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus) have not yielded promising regimens with activity in SAA (protocols 00-H-0032, 03-H-0193, and 06-H-0034). Therefore, novel regimens are needed to improve outcomes in SAA for those without a histocompatible sibling, which encompass the majority of patients with this disease. The current limitations of IST in SAA are: 1) the majority of the responses observed following initial h-ATG/CsA are partial with only a few patients achieving normal blood counts; 2) 1/3 of patients are refractory to initial h-ATG/CsA; 3) response rate in these refractory patients who are retreated is only 30 percent; 4) hematologic relapses occur in 35 percent of responders following initial response to h-ATG/CsA; 5) among relapsed patients chronic use of CsA is not infrequent which often leads to toxicities from the long term exposure to this drug (especially in older patients); and 6) clonal evolution is still observed in 10-15% of patients. Towards the goal of addressing these limitations we are proposing a novel regimen of fludarabine (Flu) plus cyclophosphamide (Cy) in SAA patients refractory to horse ATG/CsA. The Hematology Branch has considerable experience with Flu/Cy as part of the condition regimen in allotransplantation protocols (protocols 99-H-0050, 97-H-0196, 99-H-0064, 99-H-0050, 97-H-0196, 02-H-0111, 01-H0162, 03-H-0192, 04-H-0112, 06-H-0248, 07-H-0136). In addition, this regimen has been incorporated into the NCI's Surgery Branch preparative regimen for autologous HSCT prior to infusion of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. Flu/Cy is well tolerated and a potent immunosuppressive regimen that is not myeloablative. Therefore, we propose to investigate Flu/Cy to address the current limitations of IST in SAA. The main objective of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of Flu/Cy in refractory SAA. The primary endpoint will be hematologic response, defined as no longer meeting criteria for SAA, at 6 months. Secondary endpoints are relapse, robustness of hematologic recovery at 6 months, response at 3 months and 12 months, survival, clonal evolution to PNH, myelodysplasia and acute leukemia. The primary endpoint will be changes absolute neutrophil count, platelet count, and reticulocyte count at 6 months. Secondary endpoints will include time to relapse, changes in cytogenetics, and time to death. |
||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||
| Study Phase | Phase 1 Phase 2 |
||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
||||
| Condition ICMJE |
|
||||
| Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||
| Study Arm (s) | Not Provided | ||||
| Publications * |
|
||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Completed | ||||
| Enrollment ICMJE | 1 | ||||
| Completion Date | July 2012 | ||||
| Primary Completion Date | July 2012 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | -INCLUSION CRITERIA:
EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
|
||||
| Gender | Both | ||||
| Ages | 2 Years and older | ||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||||
| Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||
| Location Countries ICMJE | United States | ||||
| Administrative Information | |||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT01187017 | ||||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | 100177, 10-H-0177 | ||||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | Not Provided | ||||
| Responsible Party | National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC) ( National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) ) | ||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) | ||||
| Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||
| Information Provided By | National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC) | ||||
| Verification Date | July 2012 | ||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||