Computed Tomography Enterography (CTE) Versus Capsule Endoscopy for Overt, Obscure Gastrointestinal (GI) Bleeding
Recruitment status was Recruiting
| Tracking Information | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | April 29, 2010 | ||||||||
| Last Updated Date | May 14, 2010 | ||||||||
| Start Date ICMJE | March 2010 | ||||||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | April 2011 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Detection of an actively bleeding lesion or lesion believed to be causing bleeding symptoms. [ Time Frame: 2-3 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] Patients enrolled in the study will undergo either capsule endoscopy or CT enterography first, and this decision will generally be based on which test the clinical providers have already scheduled or availability of testing as is done with routine clinical care. The results of each the test will be read by an experienced gastroenterologist or radiologist respectively. These reviewers will be blinded to the results of any other diagnostic studies. The patient will then undergo the second test. |
||||||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||||
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01114295 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | ||||||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||||||
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | Computed Tomography Enterography (CTE) Versus Capsule Endoscopy for Overt, Obscure Gastrointestinal (GI) Bleeding | ||||||||
| Official Title ICMJE | Comparative Effectiveness of Wireless Capsule Endoscopy and Dual Energy, Phase CT Enterography in the Evaluation of Overt Obscure GI Bleeding | ||||||||
| Brief Summary | Up to 5% of patients with recurrent gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding remain undiagnosed by upper endoscopy and colonoscopy, the presumed source of bleeding in these patients being the small intestine. These patients fall under the category of "obscure gastrointestinal bleeding," and frequently require an extensive diagnostic work-up. Although capsule endoscopy (CE) has a high yield for findings, there are several limitations to its utility in the care of patients with obscure GI bleeding. For these reasons, most patients who present with obscure or occult gastrointestinal bleeding typically undergo various radiologic imaging studies, including enteroclysis, small bowel series, CT scan, angiography, and radionuclide scan. Recently, many centers (including the Brigham and Women's Hospital) have begun using CT enterography (CTE) for evaluation of suspected small bowel pathology. CT enterography combines the improved spatial and temporal resolution of multidetector row CT with large volumes of an orally administered neutral enteric contrast material to permit visualization of the small bowel wall and lumen. This modality has been shown to have considerable advantages over barium small bowel studies by allowing detection of subtle findings such as mucosal hyper-enhancement or mild wall thickening, and is better tolerated by patients than CT enteroclysis. At the Brigham and Women's Hospital, CTE has recently replaced standard abdominal CT when small bowel pathology is suspected. While CT enterography and capsule endoscopy have been directly compared in the evaluation of non-stricturing Crohn's Disease, they had not been directly compared in the evaluation of obscure GI bleeding until recently (see "Pilot Data" below). The current diagnostic algorithm for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding based on the American Gastroenterology Association technical review was published in 2007 and does not include either capsule endoscopy or CT enterography. The videocapsule was approved by the FDA in 2001 and CT enterography technique has been developed over the last 5 years. Both of these tests are currently being used as part of standard of care to evaluate obscure gastrointestinal bleeding in centers where either or both technologies are available, including the Brigham and Women's Hospital. In addition, patients are also currently being referred from area hospitals without the capacity for this type of testing to the Brigham and Women's Hospital for either or both tests for the evaluation of obscure GI bleeding. Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) refers to bleeding undiagnosed by upper endoscopy and colonoscopy. In 40-70% of cases of OGIB, a bleeding lesion is localizable to the small bowel. In OGIB, capsule endoscopy (CE) has a diagnostic yield of 40-80%, and has demonstrated diagnostic superiority to push enteroscopy, barium studies, angiography, CT angiography, and routine abdominal CT scan. When CE is non-diagnostic, however, the subsequent diagnostic algorithm is not well-defined. There is currently no established role for cross-sectional imaging for this indication. CT enterography (CTE) combines the spatial and temporal resolution of CT with an orally administered neutral enteric contrast material that permits detailed visualization of the small bowel. Unlike other imaging modalities such as nuclear medicine techniques and catheter angiography, CT is less labor-intensive, more readily available, and provides precise anatomic localization. A novel OGIB-protocol available at Brigham and Women's Hospital for CTE utilizes a dual-phase, dual energy technique that obtains images at two time points to better identify active bleeding in the mesentery. We, the investigators, plan to prospectively study an algorithm that employs CTE and compare to capsule endoscopy to investigate the effectiveness of both modalities and to evaluate the potential role of CTE in OGIB. The goal of our study is to determine observationally the contribution of both CE and the new protocol for CTE to the evaluation and management of overt obscure GI bleeding and accordingly revise the clinical algorithm. We hypothesize that CTE will be as or more effective than CE at identifying culprit lesions in overt, obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. |
||||||||
| Detailed Description | Not Provided | ||||||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||||||
| Study Phase | Not Provided | ||||||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Diagnostic |
||||||||
| Condition ICMJE | Overt, Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding | ||||||||
| Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||||||
| Study Arm (s) | Experimental: Overt Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeders
The only cohort in this study are those patients identified as having overt, obscure gastrointestinal bleeding who will then undergo CE or CTE.
Interventions:
|
||||||||
| Publications * | Not Provided | ||||||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Recruiting | ||||||||
| Estimated Enrollment ICMJE | 50 | ||||||||
| Estimated Completion Date | April 2011 | ||||||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | April 2011 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||||||
| Gender | Both | ||||||||
| Ages | 18 Years and older | ||||||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||||||||
| Contacts ICMJE |
|
||||||||
| Location Countries ICMJE | United States | ||||||||
| Administrative Information | |||||||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT01114295 | ||||||||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | CTE vs Capsule 2010 | ||||||||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | Yes | ||||||||
| Responsible Party | John Saltzman, MD, Brigham and Women's Hospital | ||||||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | Brigham and Women's Hospital | ||||||||
| Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||||||
| Information Provided By | Brigham and Women's Hospital | ||||||||
| Verification Date | April 2010 | ||||||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||||||