Comparison of 3 Learning Methods to Improve Independent Activities of Daily Living (IADLs) in Alzheimer Disease (C3LM-ILAD)
| Tracking Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | March 15, 2010 | ||||
| Last Updated Date | March 23, 2012 | ||||
| Start Date ICMJE | March 2010 | ||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | March 2012 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
The primary outcome of the intervention will be the performance and errors of participants. Each task is comparable as the assessment procedure remains the same across disease stages. [ Time Frame: 2 hours - 2 times a week during 6 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] | ||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01095718 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | ||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Baseline neuropsychological assessments. Premorbid intelligence level will be estimated by the National Adult Reading Test (NART). The Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) will be used to assessed cognitive status. [ Time Frame: 3 times through the trial ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] | ||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | Comparison of 3 Learning Methods to Improve Independent Activities of Daily Living (IADLs) in Alzheimer Disease | ||||
| Official Title ICMJE | Comparison of 3 Learning Methods and Their Underlying Mechanisms to Improve Independent Living in the Activities of Daily Living in Alzheimer's Dementia: a Randomized Controlled Trial | ||||
| Brief Summary | This study is a comparison of 3 learning techniques, Errorless learning, modelling and trial and error, in the relearning of IADL of Alzheimer patients from mild to moderately severe dementia. Tailored IADL will be chosen for each patient (n=300) and trained in individualized sessions for 6 weeks. This study focuses on the relationship between learning techniques, IADL and memory processes, in a threefold way:
|
||||
| Detailed Description | Scientific background and rationale Alzheimer dementia (AD) is the most common cause of progressive cognitive deterioration that alters memory and learning to such a degree that it heavily interferes with daily living. Functional autonomy loss is a key feature of AD, as it follows a slow degradation process in cognitive function and in the ability to perform instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), such as managing finance, food preparation or using a dish washer. Normally, learning occurs in an unstructured manner, which consists of guessing and the occurrence of errors during acquisition (Trial and Error, TE). However, there is abundant evidence that reducing errors during learning (Errorless Learning, EL) or increasing the time period between recall attempts (Modeling with Spaced Retrieval, MR) allow even moderate and severe Alzheimer Dementia (AD) patients to (re)learn instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) such as using a new route, an agenda or a cassette/radio player. While these findings are encouraging, we still do not fully understand the memory mechanisms underlying different learning techniques that are crucial in improving IADL tasks (re)learning and remembering in AD patients. Because acetyl cholinesterase inhibitors or memantine may be active moderators of intervention targeting memory improvement, complex intervention using behavioral enrichment training should explore any drug treatment by behavioral intervention interaction effects. Description of the project methodology This study focuses on the relationship between learning techniques, IADL and memory processes, in a threefold way:
Is the (re)learning effectiveness (physical performance) of each procedure and the overall maintain of the autonomy. All intervention are individualized training. The learning procedure comparison will allow us to assess the (re) learning capacities of IADL tasks in AD patients according to severity stages from mild to moderately severe. • Secondary outcome : Assessing the role of the implicit memory processes over the explicit memory processes in the (re)learning of IADL tasks. Overall effects of the intervention over the patient's autonomy, cognitive functioning, behavioral disturbances, quality of life and careers burden. Settings: Nursing Homes, Day Care centers, Memory Clinics Locations: Nijmegen, The Netherlands and Nice and Bordeaux agglomerations, France 3 different interventions given in individual sessions at participant's facility. Each intervention is a 6-week training with a post assessment at 4-week follow-up. Each participant will receive one of the 3 interventions for 2 hours twice a week in individual sessions. Errorless learning(EL) refers to the use of feedforward instruction (i.e., how to do) before actions to prevent learners from making mistakes. Modeling with Spaced Retrieval (MR) techniques refers to the modeling of the steps and the increasing time interval between the completion of the task and the rehearsal of the targeted information by the patient. Trial and Error (TE) refers to the regular unstructured learning and is considered as control condition. A standardized 1-week training has been developed in French and Dutch to train French and Dutch therapists at each learning techniques. |
||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||
| Study Phase | Not Provided | ||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety Study Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Prevention |
||||
| Condition ICMJE | Alzheimer Disease | ||||
| Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||
| Study Arm (s) |
|
||||
| Publications * | Not Provided | ||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Recruiting | ||||
| Estimated Enrollment ICMJE | 300 | ||||
| Completion Date | Not Provided | ||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | March 2012 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
|
||||
| Gender | Both | ||||
| Ages | 60 Years and older | ||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||||
| Contacts ICMJE |
|
||||
| Location Countries ICMJE | France | ||||
| Administrative Information | |||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT01095718 | ||||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | ID RCB 2009-A01303-54 | ||||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | No | ||||
| Responsible Party | Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice | ||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | Department of Clinical Research and Innovation | ||||
| Collaborators ICMJE |
|
||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||
| Information Provided By | Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice | ||||
| Verification Date | December 2011 | ||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||