Ultrasonographic Evaluation of the Radial and Ulnar Blood Flow After Radial Arterial Cannulation

This study has been completed.

Sponsor:

Information provided by:

Severance Hospital

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:

NCT01089972

First received: March 18, 2010

Last updated: March 31, 2011

Last verified: March 2010

History of Changes

Tracking Information
First Received Date ^ICMJE	March 18, 2010
Last Updated Date	March 31, 2011
Start Date ^ICMJE	May 2010
Primary Completion Date	September 2010 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Current Primary Outcome Measures ^ICMJE (submitted: August 24, 2010)	Radial artery diameter and blood flow before and after cannulation [ Time Frame: 30 min ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] Ulnar artery diameter and blood flow before and after cannulation [ Time Frame: 30 min ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Original Primary Outcome Measures ^ICMJE (submitted: March 18, 2010)	Radial artery diameter and blood flow before and after cannulation [ Time Frame: 30 min ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Change History	Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01089972 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Current Secondary Outcome Measures ^ICMJE (submitted: August 24, 2010)	The differences of radial artery diameter and blood flow after cannulation between catheter gauge(20- and 22-G) [ Time Frame: 30 min ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] The differences of ulnar artery diameter and blood flow after cannulation between catheter gauge(20- and 22-G) [ Time Frame: 30 min ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Original Secondary Outcome Measures ^ICMJE (submitted: March 18, 2010)	The differences of radial artery diameter and blood flow after cannulation between catheter gauge(20- and 22-G) [ Time Frame: 30 min ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Current Other Outcome Measures ^ICMJE	Not Provided
Original Other Outcome Measures ^ICMJE	Not Provided

Descriptive Information
Brief Title ^ICMJE	Ultrasonographic Evaluation of the Radial and Ulnar Blood Flow After Radial Arterial Cannulation
Official Title ^ICMJE	Not Provided
Brief Summary	The aim of this randomized study was to compare the impact of two different radial arterial catheters - 20G and 22G - on the changes of diameter, blood flow and velocity of radial artery and ulnar artery after induction of anesthesia and after cannulation.
Detailed Description	Not Provided
Study Type ^ICMJE	Observational
Study Design ^ICMJE	Observational Model: Case Control Time Perspective: Prospective
Target Follow-Up Duration	Not Provided
Biospecimen	Not Provided
Sampling Method	Probability Sample
Study Population	The patient(age >20) who are scheduled for elective surgery and need arterial
Condition ^ICMJE	Radial Artery, Regional Blood Flow
Intervention ^ICMJE	Device: 22 gauge catheter radial artery cannulation using 22 gauge catheter Device: 20 gauge catheter radial artery cannulation using 20 gauge catheter
Study Group/Cohort (s)	20 gauge group Intervention: Device: 20 gauge catheter 22 gauge group Intervention: Device: 22 gauge catheter
Publications *	Not Provided
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.

Recruitment Information
Recruitment Status ^ICMJE	Completed
Enrollment ^ICMJE	80
Completion Date	September 2010
Primary Completion Date	September 2010 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Eligibility Criteria ^ICMJE	Inclusion Criteria: The patient who are scheduled for elective surgery and need arterial cannulation Exclusion Criteria: Coronary occlusive disease Known or suspected upper extremity peripheral arterial disease Coagulopathy DM with peripheral neuropathy Infection at puncture site
Gender	Both
Ages	20 Years and older
Accepts Healthy Volunteers	No
Contacts ^ICMJE	Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Location Countries ^ICMJE	Korea, Republic of

Administrative Information
NCT Number ^ICMJE	NCT01089972
Other Study ID Numbers ^ICMJE	IRB 1-2009-0033
Has Data Monitoring Committee	Not Provided
Responsible Party	Severance Hospital, Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute
Study Sponsor ^ICMJE	Severance Hospital
Collaborators ^ICMJE	Not Provided
Investigators ^ICMJE	Not Provided
Information Provided By	Severance Hospital
Verification Date	March 2010
^ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP

To Top