| February 16, 2010 |
| April 18, 2012 |
| February 2010 |
| January 2012 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Effects of mastication on appetite. [ Time Frame: 12 hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] Effects of varying chewing intensity on self-rated hunger, fullness, desire to eat and thirst. |
| Not Provided |
| Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01070212 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site |
- Endocrine response [ Time Frame: 4 hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Effects of varying chewing intensity on serum/plasma GLP-1, Ghrelin, CCK, Insulin.
- Blood chemistries [ Time Frame: 4 Hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Effects of varying chewing intensity on lipid profiles and glucose.
|
| Not Provided |
| Not Provided |
| Not Provided |
| |
| Effects of Gum Chewing on Appetite and Digestion |
| Effects of Gum Chewing on Appetite and Digestion |
One obvious property difference between energy-yielding beverages and solid foods is the oral mechanical processing required to prepare the two food forms for swallowing. Considerable human data are consistent with a contribution of mechanical stimulation to appetite suppression. However, no study has isolated this property and assessed its influence on ingestive behavior in humans. This is the aim of the present study. The null hypothesis is that food rheology will have no effect on these indices. The alternate hypothesis is that increased mechanical stimulation will result in stronger satiation/satiety and reduced energy intake. Further, it is hypothesized that the effects of mastication will be less evident in obese compared to lean individuals. |
| Not Provided |
| Interventional |
| Not Provided |
Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Basic Science |
- The Null Hypothesis is That Food Rheology Will Have no Effect on These Indices.
- The Alternate Hypothesis is That Increased Mechanical Stimulation Will Result in Stronger Satiation/Satiety and Reduced Energy Intake.
- Further, it is Hypothesized That the Effects of Mastication Will be Less Evident in Obese Compared to Lean Individuals.
|
- Other: soft gum
. Participants will either chew nothing or chew one of the two gum varieties (flavorless soft or hard) at a constant rate (determined by a metronome) for 15 minutes while sipping apple juice through a straw. Appetite will be measured continuously via a slide potentiometer attached to a 100mm gLMS scale. The juice will provide 10% of the participants estimated daily energy requirement (i.e., equal to 1-2 servings of most commercial snacks). It will also contain 10g of lactulose (a soluble, non-absorbable carbohydrate used to assess gastric transit time via analyses of breath hydrogen) and acetaminophen (a marker for gastric emptying).
- Other: firm gum
. Participants will either chew nothing or chew one of the two gum varieties (flavorless soft or hard) at a constant rate (determined by a metronome) for 15 minutes while sipping apple juice through a straw. Appetite will be measured continuously via a slide potentiometer attached to a 100mm gLMS scale. The juice will provide 10% of the participants estimated daily energy requirement (i.e., equal to 1-2 servings of most commercial snacks). It will also contain 10g of lactulose (a soluble, non-absorbable carbohydrate used to assess gastric transit time via analyses of breath hydrogen) and acetaminophen (a marker for gastric emptying).
- Other: no gum
. Participants will either chew nothing or chew one of the two gum varieties (flavorless soft or hard) at a constant rate (determined by a metronome) for 15 minutes while sipping apple juice through a straw. Appetite will be measured continuously via a slide potentiometer attached to a 100mm gLMS scale. The juice will provide 10% of the participants estimated daily energy requirement (i.e., equal to 1-2 servings of most commercial snacks). It will also contain 10g of lactulose (a soluble, non-absorbable carbohydrate used to assess gastric transit time via analyses of breath hydrogen) and acetaminophen (a marker for gastric emptying).
|
- Experimental: soft gum
. Participants will either chew nothing or chew one of the two gum varieties (flavorless soft or hard) at a constant rate (determined by a metronome) for 15 minutes while sipping apple juice through a straw. Appetite will be measured continuously via a slide potentiometer attached to a 100mm gLMS scale. The juice will provide 10% of the participants estimated daily energy requirement (i.e., equal to 1-2 servings of most commercial snacks). It will also contain 10g of lactulose (a soluble, non-absorbable carbohydrate used to assess gastric transit time via analyses of breath hydrogen) and acetaminophen (a marker for gastric emptying).
Intervention: Other: soft gum
- Experimental: firm gum
. Participants will either chew nothing or chew one of the two gum varieties (flavorless soft or hard) at a constant rate (determined by a metronome) for 15 minutes while sipping apple juice through a straw. Appetite will be measured continuously via a slide potentiometer attached to a 100mm gLMS scale. The juice will provide 10% of the participants estimated daily energy requirement (i.e., equal to 1-2 servings of most commercial snacks). It will also contain 10g of lactulose (a soluble, non-absorbable carbohydrate used to assess gastric transit time via analyses of breath hydrogen) and acetaminophen (a marker for gastric emptying).
Intervention: Other: firm gum
- Experimental: no gum
. Participants will either chew nothing or chew one of the two gum varieties (flavorless soft or hard) at a constant rate (determined by a metronome) for 15 minutes while sipping apple juice through a straw. Appetite will be measured continuously via a slide potentiometer attached to a 100mm gLMS scale. The juice will provide 10% of the participants estimated daily energy requirement (i.e., equal to 1-2 servings of most commercial snacks). It will also contain 10g of lactulose (a soluble, non-absorbable carbohydrate used to assess gastric transit time via analyses of breath hydrogen) and acetaminophen (a marker for gastric emptying).
Intervention: Other: no gum
|
| Not Provided |
| |
| Completed |
| 60 |
| January 2012 |
| January 2012 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
Inclusion Criteria:
- body mass index 18 -25 or 30-35 kg/ m2 good health not initiating or terminating the use of medications reported to affect appetite or body weight during the proposed study period stable activity level (no deviation > 1X/wk @ 30 min/session) no eating disorder (score <20 of the Eating Attitude Test (EAT-26) no allergies to test foods. not glucose intolerant or diabetic (based on fasting blood glucose between 70-99mg/dl (3.9-5.5mmol/l as recommended by the American Diabetes Association.) no history of GI pathology and self-reported consumer of breakfast and lunch.
Exclusion Criteria:
- |
| Both |
| 18 Years to 50 Years |
| Yes |
| Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects |
| United States |
| |
| NCT01070212 |
| R01DK079913-2, R01DK079913, 0911008653 |
| No |
| Purdue University |
| Purdue University |
| National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) |
| Not Provided
| Purdue University |
| April 2012 |