Regadenoson Combined With Symptom-Limited Exercise in Patients Undergoing Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
| Tracking Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | November 25, 2009 | ||||
| Last Updated Date | March 18, 2013 | ||||
| Start Date ICMJE | January 2010 | ||||
| Primary Completion Date | March 2012 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Number of Participants With Major Adverse Events or Side Effects Graded "Severe" on Symptom Questionnaire [ Time Frame: 24 hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ] Number of participants with any side effect (flushing, shortness of breath, headache, chest discomfort, dizziness, nausea, or abdominal pain) requiring specific treatment or graded as "severe" by the patient; or any death, myocardial infarction, or unplanned hospitalization. Note that 2 patients allocated to exercise-vasodilator stress did not complete symptom questionnaires and are therefore excluded from analysis. |
||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Major adverse events [ Time Frame: 24 hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ] | ||||
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01021618 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | ||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Myocardial Perfusion Image Quality [ Time Frame: 0 hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] Single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion acquisition and image processing was performed in accordance with American Society of Nuclear Cardiology guidelines. All images were interpreted by consensus read of three investigators blinded to stress test protocol and results. Overall perfusion and gated image quality were described as excellent (no artifacts interfering with myocardial perfusion interpretation), good, fair, or poor (artifact requiring reprocessing or repeat imaging of the patient to allow for diagnostic interpretation). |
||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Myocardial perfusion image quality [ Time Frame: 0 hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] | ||||
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | Regadenoson Combined With Symptom-Limited Exercise in Patients Undergoing Myocardial Perfusion Imaging | ||||
| Official Title ICMJE | The Ex-Lex Trial: A Randomized Trial Combining Regadenoson With Symptom-Limited Exercise in Patients Undergoing Myocardial Perfusion Imaging | ||||
| Brief Summary | Not infrequently, a physician is faced with uncertainty regarding the ability of a patient to perform adequate exercise in the noninvasive evaluation of known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) by the use of radionuclide stress myocardial perfusion imaging. In selected patients, protocols that combine exercise (either low-level or symptom-limited) with vasodilator stress agents have been found to be safe and effective in both identification of the presence and severity of CAD as well as risk stratification for adverse cardiac outcome. However, currently utilized combined stress protocols have drawbacks. Further refinement of combined stress protocols would potentially lead to more appropriate stress protocol selection for patients while enhancing laboratory efficiency. The purpose of this prospective, randomized study will be to evaluate the relative merits of combining regadenoson with symptom-limited exercise in patients clinically-referred for vasodilator-exercise stress myocardial perfusion imaging for the assessment of known or suspected CAD. It is hypothesized that combining regadenoson with symptom-limited exercise is a safe and feasible stress testing modality which is non-inferior to that which combines symptom-limited exercise with dipyridamole. |
||||
| Detailed Description | Not Provided | ||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||
| Study Phase | Not Provided | ||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Diagnostic |
||||
| Condition ICMJE |
|
||||
| Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||
| Study Arm (s) |
|
||||
| Publications * |
|
||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Completed | ||||
| Enrollment ICMJE | 140 | ||||
| Completion Date | March 2012 | ||||
| Primary Completion Date | March 2012 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||
| Gender | Both | ||||
| Ages | 30 Years and older | ||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||||
| Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||
| Location Countries ICMJE | United States | ||||
| Administrative Information | |||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT01021618 | ||||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | HELL002965HI | ||||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | No | ||||
| Responsible Party | Hartford Hospital | ||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | Hartford Hospital | ||||
| Collaborators ICMJE | Astellas Pharma Inc | ||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||
| Information Provided By | Hartford Hospital | ||||
| Verification Date | March 2013 | ||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||