Determining a Viral Load Threshold for Treating Cytomegalovirus (CMV)
Recruitment status was Recruiting
| Tracking Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | June 12, 2009 | ||||
| Last Updated Date | July 27, 2010 | ||||
| Start Date ICMJE | February 2003 | ||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | February 2011 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Group A # with low level of CMV who develop a viral load > 3000 copies/ml & Group B # who develop a 2nd episode of a viral load above 3000 copies/ml after therapy stopped. [ Time Frame: At study completion ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] | ||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00947141 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | ||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
To define the duration of antiviral therapy needed to treat CMV viraemia. To record the rate of increase in viral load prior to starting preemptive therapy & to correlate viral loads with CMV specific immune function. [ Time Frame: At study completion ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] | ||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | Determining a Viral Load Threshold for Treating Cytomegalovirus (CMV) | ||||
| Official Title ICMJE | Determining a Viral Load Threshold for Pre-emptive Therapy for Cytomegalovirus Infection in Transplant Patients Using Real Time PCR Monitoring | ||||
| Brief Summary | This study aims to determine: a) whether those patients with 'low level' viral load results (between 200 and 3,000 copies/ml) could be monitored as opposed to starting preemptive therapy with valganciclovir, ganciclovir and/or foscarnet; b) whether those patients with 'high level' viral load results (above 3,000 copies/ml) could stop preemptive therapy earlier, thus maximising the benefits of therapy and minimising its risks. |
||||
| Detailed Description | Background and Study Rationale In transplant recipients with CMV infection, the risk of developing CMV disease is directly proportional to the CMV DNA viral load. Historically at The Royal Free, Hampstead, patients were given preemptive therapy on the basis of two consecutive positive CMV PCR results as detected by a qualitative PCR technique. With the introduction of real time PCR, using a Taqman probe and the ABI7700 thermal cycler, it is possible to obtain rapid and sensitive results of viral load on clinical samples with a lower limit of detection of 200 copies/ml. Thus, viral load data can be incorporated into the clinical management of the patient. From our natural history data, it has been shown that patients with CMV disease had a CMV PCR load ranging from 14,000 to 203 million (median 175,500). The lower bound of the 95% confidence limits of this distribution was 37,000 copies/ml and we aimed to initiate therapy in time to prevent CMV viral load reaching this value. To give a margin of safety, bearing in mind the 1 day average doubling-time of CMV and the timing of sampling twice-weekly, we therefore recommended that preemptive therapy be given once the viral load increases above 3,000 copies/ml. In the past, all patients with a CMV PCR load between 200 and 3,000 copies/ml have received preemptive treatment because the previous PCR assay did not give a quantitative result. As treatment is associated with side effects such as neutropaenia (ganciclovir) and renal impairment (foscarnet) it would be preferable to avoid unnecessary exposure where possible. This study aims to determine: a) whether those patients with 'low level' viral load results (between 200 and 3,000 copies/ml) could be monitored as opposed to starting preemptive therapy with valganciclovir, ganciclovir and/or foscarnet; b) whether those patients with 'high level' viral load results (above 3,000 copies/ml) could stop preemptive therapy earlier, thus maximising the benefits of therapy and minimising its risks. Objectives Primary Objectives
Secondary Objectives
|
||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||
| Study Phase | Phase 4 | ||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
||||
| Condition ICMJE | Cytomegalovirus | ||||
| Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||
| Study Arm (s) | Experimental: Group A & Group B
Group A: (low level infection) Group B: (patients receiving pre-emptive therapy)
Interventions:
|
||||
| Publications * | Not Provided | ||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Recruiting | ||||
| Estimated Enrollment ICMJE | 178 | ||||
| Estimated Completion Date | August 2011 | ||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | February 2011 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||
| Gender | Both | ||||
| Ages | 18 Years and older | ||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||||
| Contacts ICMJE |
|
||||
| Location Countries ICMJE | United Kingdom | ||||
| Administrative Information | |||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT00947141 | ||||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | 6077, REC # 6077, Royal Free R and D # 5219, EudraCT 2007-003472-19 | ||||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | No | ||||
| Responsible Party | Professor P D Griffiths MD DSc, Centre for Virology, Royal Free and University College Medical School | ||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust | ||||
| Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||
| Information Provided By | Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust | ||||
| Verification Date | July 2009 | ||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||