Evidence-Based Medicine Electronic Decision Support Study (EBMeDS)

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Collaborators:
The Finnish Medical Society Duodecim
National Institute for Health and Welfare, Finland
Duodecim Medical Publications Ltd.
ProWellness Ltd.
The Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation (TEKES)
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Tiina Kortteisto, University of Tampere
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00915304
First received: June 5, 2009
Last updated: December 17, 2012
Last verified: December 2012

June 5, 2009
December 17, 2012
June 2009
February 2011   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
The number of reminders triggered (in relation to the number of eligible patients, Ri/Ni) during repeated Virtual Health Checks (VHCs) [ Time Frame: Follow-up time max one and half year ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
VHC will be performed once a week for the whole study population, beginning at baseline and before randomisation. The main outcome measure is Ri/Ni at follow-up time after commencement of the study where Ri is the total number of reminders triggered by the patient record data in intervention and in control group at the time of analysis, and Ni is the total number of patients.
The number of reminders triggered (in relation to the number of eligible patients) during repeated Virtual Health Checks (VHCs) [ Time Frame: one year ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00915304 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Specific clinical measures compared to an intervention and a control group [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Clinical measures as mean values of laboratory parameters, for example a mean level of HbA1c, a mean level of total cholesterol.
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Evidence-Based Medicine Electronic Decision Support Study
Patient Specific Automatic Reminders in Primary Care - the EBMeDS Randomised Trial

The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of the Evidence-Based Medicine electronic Decision Support (EBMeDS) automatic reminders in primary health care.

Hypothesis (1)is that in the intervention group the total number of EBMeDS reminders will decrease compared to the control group.

Hypothesis (2) is that in the intervention group the quality measures will increase faster compared to the control group at follow-up time.

Not Provided
Interventional
Phase 1
Phase 2
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator)
Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
Decision Support Systems, Clinical
Behavioral: The EBMeDS reminders

Phase I: EBMeDS reminders specific to the visiting or caring patient and his/her clinical problem are generated when the practitioner uses the electronic patient record. During visits of intervention group patients the EBMeDS reminders will be shown on screen to the practitioner.

Phase II: As phase I and in addition, results of the Virtual Health Check (VHC) of all the intervention group patients will be shown to the practitioners.Phase II will be fulfilled in Autumn 2010 and follow-up time will be about 3 months.

Not Provided
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
12101
February 2011
February 2011   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All residents of Sipoo who have patient ID number in the Mediatri electronic patient record system in Sipoo Health Centre

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those residents who's occupational health care is produced by Sipoo Health Centre
Both
Not Provided
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Finland
 
NCT00915304
EBMeDS-40344-06
No
Tiina Kortteisto, University of Tampere
University of Tampere
  • The Finnish Medical Society Duodecim
  • National Institute for Health and Welfare, Finland
  • Duodecim Medical Publications Ltd.
  • ProWellness Ltd.
  • The Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation (TEKES)
Study Director: Pekka Rissanen, Professor University of Tampere; School of Health Sciences
Principal Investigator: Tiina Kortteisto, MSc University of Tampere; School of Health Sciences
University of Tampere
December 2012

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP