Trial Comparing Two Carboplatin Doses in Groups C and D Intraocular Retinoblastoma
| Tracking Information | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | April 27, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
| Last Updated Date | February 7, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
| Start Date ICMJE | April 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | April 2012 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||||||||||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Ocular salvage rates in two randomly divided groups of group C and D retinoblastomas, treated with primary chemotherapy protocol using 560mg/m2 carboplatin and 750mg/m2 carboplatin respectively [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] | ||||||||||||||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||||||||||||
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00889018 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | ||||||||||||||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
To evaluate the response of subtenon carboplatin injections in cases of group C and D retinoblastomas that fail to respond to primary chemotherapy and local treatment [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] | ||||||||||||||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||||||||||||
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||||||||||
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||||||||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||||||||||||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | Trial Comparing Two Carboplatin Doses in Groups C and D Intraocular Retinoblastoma | ||||||||||||||||
| Official Title ICMJE | Randomized Control Trial Comparing Carboplatin 560mg/m2 With 750mg/m2 for Ocular Salvage in Groups C and D Intraocular Retinoblastoma | ||||||||||||||||
| Brief Summary | The purpose of this study is to determine whether an increase in the dose of carboplatin in treatment of advanced intraocular (group C and D) retinoblastoma helps in avoiding radiotherapy and improves the rate of globe salvage. |
||||||||||||||||
| Detailed Description | Chemoreduction has become an important method in management of retinoblastoma. This technique has been employed in an effort to avoid enucleation and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for children with intraocular retinoblastoma, especially those with bilateral disease. Although an ideal regimen for chemoreduction has not been determined, most authors use a combination of vincristine, etoposide and carboplatin for 2- 6 cycles along with local treatment including cryotherapy, laser photocoagulation, thermotherapy and plaque radiotherapy. Chemoreduction along with local treatment has been shown to have high treatment success in groups A and B of retinoblastoma allowing globe salvage without need of EBRT. But globe salvage rates remain low in groups C and D, which mostly need enucleation, or EBRT in a large number of cases. In bilateral retinoblastoma where one eye is already lost owing to enucleation or both the eyes have advanced retinoblastoma (group C/D) globe salvage assumes a significant role in the overall treatment. Recurrences of the vitreous seeds or the sub retinal seeds are the main causes of treatment failure with chemoreduction and local treatment, ultimately requiring enucleation or EBRT. The recurrence of vitreous or subretinal seeds do not necessarily mean a tumor resistance, it may reflect an inadequate penetration of the chemotherapeutic agents in these relatively avascular sites i.e the vitreous cavity or the subretinal space. The penetration to these sites could be enhanced by (a) increase in the dose of the intravenous chemotherapeutic agents. The IInd Toronto protocol that was started in 2000 explores this option. The initial reports are encouraging but they have used high doses chemotherapy in combination with cyclosporin A. Therefore the effect of high dose chemotherapy on the globe salvage rates in groups C and D cannot be evaluated as an independent factor. (b) Periocular carboplatin injection has proven to deliver much higher levels of the drug in to the vitreous cavity, but several studies have revealed local side effects of this apparently harmless technique.The National Collaborative Retinoblastoma Study funded by the Children's oncology group plans to carry out a single arm trial of 6 cycles of systemic high dose chemotherapy and subtenon carboplatin injections in groups C and D of retinoblastoma. (c) Use of Cryotherapy/thermotherapy along with chemotherapy, has shown to increase the penetration of the chemotherapeutic agents into the vitreous cavity probably by disrupting the blood retinal barrier. Shield's et al has already shown that the 6 cycle chemotherapy regimen achieves better long-term control of vitreous and subretinal seeds as compared to a 2 cycle regimen. We planned this study to compare two different dose schedules of carboplatin and compare the rate of globe salvage in group C and D retinoblastoma and also to evaluate the effect of subtenon Carboplatin injections in cases that fail to respond to primary chemotherapy. |
||||||||||||||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||||||||||||||
| Study Phase | Not Provided | ||||||||||||||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
||||||||||||||||
| Condition ICMJE | Intraocular Retinoblastoma | ||||||||||||||||
| Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||||||||||||||
| Study Arm (s) |
|
||||||||||||||||
| Publications * | Not Provided | ||||||||||||||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||||||||||||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||||||||||||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Active, not recruiting | ||||||||||||||||
| Estimated Enrollment ICMJE | 60 | ||||||||||||||||
| Estimated Completion Date | April 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | April 2012 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||||||||||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||||||||||||||
| Gender | Both | ||||||||||||||||
| Ages | Not Provided | ||||||||||||||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||||||||||||||||
| Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||||||||||||||
| Location Countries ICMJE | India | ||||||||||||||||
| Administrative Information | |||||||||||||||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT00889018 | ||||||||||||||||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | RACHNAMEEL | ||||||||||||||||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | No | ||||||||||||||||
| Responsible Party | Rachna Meel, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi | ||||||||||||||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi | ||||||||||||||||
| Collaborators ICMJE | Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India | ||||||||||||||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||||||||||||||
| Information Provided By | All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi | ||||||||||||||||
| Verification Date | February 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||||||||||||||