Comparison of 3 Days and 7 Days Intravenous Ceftriaxone Prophylaxis for Variceal Bleeding
Recruitment status was Recruiting
| Tracking Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | February 6, 2009 | ||||
| Last Updated Date | August 8, 2010 | ||||
| Start Date ICMJE | March 2009 | ||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | June 2011 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
rebleeding rate within 14 days [ Time Frame: 14 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] | ||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00838864 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | ||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
motarlity rate within 28 days [ Time Frame: 28 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] | ||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | Comparison of 3 Days and 7 Days Intravenous Ceftriaxone Prophylaxis for Variceal Bleeding | ||||
| Official Title ICMJE | Comparison of 3 Days and 7 Days Intravenous Ceftriaxone Prophylaxis in Patients With Acute Variceal Bleeding | ||||
| Brief Summary | Prophylactic antibiotics have been routinely recommended for cirrhotic patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding recently. However, the regimen and duration of its use remain an inconclusive issue. Quinolones and 3rd generation cephalosporins have been more often used for prophyalxis recently. The duration for antibiotic usage were variable in the literatures, ranged from 4-10 days. The latest guideline from AASLD in 2007 was 7 days. In the survey of infections in cirrhotic patients with UGI bleeding performed by Bernard et al, most infections occurred in the first 5 days and half within the first 48 hours. Therefore, considering the cost-effectiveness and drug resistance issues, the necessity for such prophylaxis for 7 days may need to be re-evaluated. The purpose of our study is to investigate the antibiotic prophylaxis duration for cirrhotic patients with acute gastro-esophageal variceal bleeding. We will enroll those patients suffering from variceal bleeding documented by endoscopic examination and without apparent evidence of infection. Those who have received antibiotics within 2 weeks, are less than 18 years old, get pregnant, have malignancy other than HCC, have allergy to ceftrioxone are excluded. After receiving well explanation and giving consent, these patients are randomly allocated to 2 groups and receive prophylactic antibiotic just after endoscopic examination; Group I: receiving ceftriaxone 500 mg iv bolus stat and then q12h for 3 days, Group II: receiving ceftriaxone 500 mg iv bolus stat and then q12h for 7 days. They will receive appropriate endoscopic treatment for gastro-esophgeal varices and glypressin 1mg q6h for 3 days. They will start to feed on the 2nd day if not contraindicated. The 2nd endoscopic treatment for varices will be performed 2 weeks later. We record the demographic data, vital signs, transfusion amount; check hemogram, U/A, CXR, ascites routine (with apparent ascites), classification of variceal size and Child-Pugh classification. We monitor the events of rebleeding & infection, transfusion amount and hospitalization days We use rebleeding rate within 14 days as the primary end point. It is defined as the following events after initial stabilization of vital signs for 24 hours; (1): recurrence of hematemesis or bloody stool (2); need of transfusion more than 2 unit of blood and systolic pressure < 100 mmHg or pulse rate > 100/mn. We use infection rate during admission and mortality rate within 28 days as secondary end points. |
||||
| Detailed Description |
Secondary end points: infection during admission, mortality rate within 28 days. Definition of infection: 1) bacteremia:positive blood culture, but no definite focus indentified, 2) spontaneous bacterial peritonitis : ascites routine: PMN> 250/mm3, 3)urinary tract infection: U/A WBC > 15/HPF and positive urine culture, 4)other infections: suspected by clinical, radiological or other bacterialogical examination, 5)respiratory tract infection:CXR changes with clinical evidence, 6)possible infection: fever (>37.5。C more than 6 hours) and leucocytosis,WBC > 15000 mm3 ,but with negative blood culture |
||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||
| Study Phase | Phase 4 | ||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Prevention |
||||
| Condition ICMJE |
|
||||
| Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||
| Study Arm (s) |
|
||||
| Publications * |
|
||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Recruiting | ||||
| Estimated Enrollment ICMJE | 100 | ||||
| Estimated Completion Date | September 2011 | ||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | June 2011 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||
| Gender | Both | ||||
| Ages | 18 Years and older | ||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||||
| Contacts ICMJE |
|
||||
| Location Countries ICMJE | Taiwan | ||||
| Administrative Information | |||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT00838864 | ||||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | FEMH-97-C-010 | ||||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | Yes | ||||
| Responsible Party | Tzong-Hsi Lee, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital | ||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | Far Eastern Memorial Hospital | ||||
| Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||
| Information Provided By | Far Eastern Memorial Hospital | ||||
| Verification Date | January 2009 | ||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||