Effects of Carotid Stent Design on Cerebral Embolization

This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants.
Sponsor:
Information provided by:
Dallas VA Medical Center
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00830232
First received: January 26, 2009
Last updated: August 5, 2011
Last verified: August 2011

January 26, 2009
August 5, 2011
December 2008
December 2011   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Transcranial doppler counts of micro-embolic signals in the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery. [ Time Frame: First 24 hours after implantation of carotid stent ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00830232 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Composite of any stroke, myocardial infarction or death [ Time Frame: within 30 days after the carotid stenting procedure ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Subclinical cerebral embolization assessed by brain diffusion-weighted MRI [ Time Frame: within 24 hours after carotid artery stenting ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Composite of any stroke, myocardial infarction or death [ Time Frame: within 30 days after the carotid stenting procedure ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Subclinical cerebral embolization [ Time Frame: within 24 hours after carotid artery stenting ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Effects of Carotid Stent Design on Cerebral Embolization
Effects of Carotid Stent Design on Cerebral Embolization

The goal of the proposed study is to contrast the relative efficacy of closed-cell stents versus open-cell stents in preventing periprocedural cerebral embolization in high-risk patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic extracranial carotid stenosis undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS).

Stroke is responsible for more than 10% of all deaths and much severe disability in developed countries. In the United States, approximately 600,000 new strokes are reported annually, of which 150,000 are fatal, and more than 4,000,000 surviving stroke victims are affected by significant disability. Seventy-five percent of strokes occur in the distribution of the carotid arteries and are considered of a thromboembolic etiology, most of which originate in carotid lesions. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) with cerebral embolic protection is currently the preferred treatment of carotid stenosis in high risk surgical patients, i.e., those with significant comorbidities or a hostile neck from previous surgical procedures or radiation. Although several predictors of adverse outcomes after CAS have been identified, the effects of device characteristics, including stent design, on neurologic adverse events have not been established.

The proposed study will be a randomized prospective controlled trial designed to test the hypothesis that the implantation of closed-cell stents for carotid lesions in high-risk patients will be associated with a reduced perioperative cerebral microembolization, as detected by transcranial Doppler and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the brain, and reduced 30-day stroke, myocardial infarction, and death rates when compared with the implantation of open-cell stents.

Interventional
Not Provided
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Stroke
  • Carotid Stenosis
  • Device: closed-cell stent
    Closed-cell stent: Comparison of two types of carotid stent designs (open- vs. closed-cell) regarding the primary and secondary outcomes.
    Other Name: Carotid artery angioplasty
  • Device: Open-cell stent
    Open-cell Stent: Comparison of two types of carotid stent designs (open- vs. closed-cell) regarding the primary and secondary outcomes.
    Other Name: Carotid artery angioplasty
  • Active Comparator: Closed-cell stent
    Intervention: Device: closed-cell stent
  • Active Comparator: Open-cell stent
    Intervention: Device: Open-cell stent
Timaran CH, Rosero EB, Higuera A, Ilarraza A, Modrall JG, Clagett GP. Randomized clinical trial of open-cell vs closed-cell stents for carotid stenting and effects of stent design on cerebral embolization. J Vasc Surg. 2011 Nov;54(5):1310-1316.e1; discussion 1316. Epub 2011 Jul 1.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Active, not recruiting
40
February 2012
December 2011   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject is at high risk for carotid endarterectomy due to either anatomic or co-morbid conditions; AND
  • Symptomatic patients (TIA or non-disabling stroke within 6 months of the procedure), with carotid stenosis ≥ 50% as diagnosed by angiography, using NASCET methodology (50); OR
  • Asymptomatic patients with carotid stenosis ≥ 80% as diagnosed by angiography, using NASCET methodology

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Conditions that interfere with the evaluation of endpoints
  • Subject has anticipated or potential sources of cardiac emboli
  • Subject plans to have a major surgical procedure within 30 days after the index procedure.
  • Subject has intracranial pathology that makes the subject inappropriate for study participation.
  • Subject has a total occlusion of the ipsilateral carotid artery (i.e., CCA).
  • Severe circumferential lesion calcification that may restrict the full deployment of the carotid stent.
  • Carotid stenosis located distal to the target stenosis that is more severe than the target stenosis.
Both
18 Years and older
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States
 
NCT00830232
IRB#08-035
No
James LePage, PhD/ ACOS for Research, Dallas VA Medical Center
Dallas VA Medical Center
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Carlos H Timaran, MD Dallas VA Medical Center
Dallas VA Medical Center
August 2011

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP