Comparison of USCOM Cardiac Output and Continuous Thermodilution Cardiac Output
| Tracking Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | December 5, 2008 | ||||
| Last Updated Date | December 8, 2008 | ||||
| Start Date ICMJE | March 2006 | ||||
| Primary Completion Date | July 2006 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
All 18 post-CABG coronary artery disease patients receiving treatment in the SCCU of Beijing Chaoyang Hospital from March to July 2006 [ Time Frame: The period of monitoring time after CABG was 0.5-6hrs. ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ] | ||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00804778 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | ||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
All 18 post-CABG coronary artery disease patients receiving treatment in the SCCU of Beijing Chaoyang Hospital from March to July 2006 [ Time Frame: The period of monitoring time after CABG was 0.5-6hrs. ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ] | ||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | Comparison of USCOM Cardiac Output and Continuous Thermodilution Cardiac Output | ||||
| Official Title ICMJE | Comparison of USCOM Cardiac Output and Continuous Thermodilution Cardiac Output in Patients With Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting | ||||
| Brief Summary | It's reported that USCOM can be used to measured patients' CO and CI conveniently, accurately and not confined to place, because of it's no aggressive, it's accuracy is doubtful. |
||||
| Detailed Description | 18 post-CABG coronary artery disease patients receiving treatment in the SCCU of Beijing Chaoyang Hospital from March to July 2006, male (10) and female (8), with average age of 61.71士10.07 years. Aortic regurgitation or stenosis was ruled out by preoperational color ultrasonic imaging, endocardiac shunt did not exist and there was no heart valve replacement in all the patients. For all the patients after operation, pericardial cavity or left thorax close drainage, small tidal volume (6-8ml/kg) capacity controlled ventilation of breathing machine, appropriate pressure support (10-15cmH2O) and appropriate positive end-expiratory pressure were applied. Intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP) was not used. Institutional ethics approval was obtained for the conduct of the trial. All the patients received CABG under general anesthesia and non-extracorporeal circulation. Swan-Ganz CCO catheter (mbo 744HF75, USA) was set through right internal jugular vein or right subcalvian vein. The catheters were connected with VIGILANCE monitor after patients went back SCCU and the position of the catheters was adjusted. The bodyweight, height, instant heart rate, central venous pressure, invasive average aortic pressure and pulmonary wedge pressure of the patients were inputted into VIGILANCE monitor. VIGILANCE monitor automatically and intermittently displayed and saved the results of CO, CI, SVR, PVR and other hemodynamic parameters. VIGILANCE determined the hemodynamic parameters every 40-55seconds based on the signal noise ratio. The period of USCOM monitoring time after CABG was 0.5-6hrs. Lowered the bed head and had the patients in horizontal position during the monitoring. Monitoring area was AV area. Turned on USCOM, selected AV mode, inputted the sex, height, bodyweight and birth date of the patients. Applied ultra transmission gel on the probe to let the probe contact the skin closely and let the probe point to the gluteal region nearly. USCOM screen automatically displayed the lateral border of the Doppler blood flow curve scanned with flow monitor and speaker displayed the acoustic signal of blood stream. The position, depth and direction of the probe were adjusted based on the figure signals and acoustic signals acquired with USCOM probe. Adjusted the sound volume, wave gain or contrast or turned the patient head gently. It indicated that the sound wave emitted by the probe had passed through aortic valve orifice or the root of aorta and the direction of sound beam paralleled to the blood flow through the aorta valve orifice when USCOM screen displayed maximum Doppler blood velocity wave and speaker displayed sharp and strong blood acoustic signals. The results were frozen and saved . Optimal measuring site, depth the probe was depressed down and direction of the probe were marked for the next measurement. Continuous 3-5 Doppler flow curves and the CO and CI measured on them were taken each time. The flow curves of one respiratory circle were taken for atrial fibrillation patients. For round probe, plane diameter was 1.5cm and frequency was 3.3MHz. The probe was disinfected with Iodophors each time before and after the measurement. The data of patient height, bodyweight and age, and operation duration was acquired from anesthesia note. CO time intervals measured with the two methods were about 2min. There was at least 30min interval between each pair of CO. Three to four pairs of CO and CI data were taken for each patient. |
||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Observational | ||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Target Follow-Up Duration | Not Provided | ||||
| Biospecimen | Not Provided | ||||
| Sampling Method | Probability Sample | ||||
| Study Population | 18 post-CABG coronary artery disease patients receiving treatment in the SCCU of Beijing Chaoyang Hospital from March to July 2006, male (10) and female (8), with average age of 61.71士10.07 years.For all the patients after operation, pericardial cavity or left thorax close drainage, small tidal volume (6-8ml/kg) capacity controlled ventilation of breathing machine, appropriate pressure support (10-15cmH2O) and appropriate positive end-expiratory pressure were applied. Institutional ethics approval was obtained for the conduct of the trial. |
||||
| Condition ICMJE | Coronary Artery Disease | ||||
| Intervention ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Study Group/Cohort (s) |
|
||||
| Publications * |
|
||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Completed | ||||
| Enrollment ICMJE | 18 | ||||
| Completion Date | July 2006 | ||||
| Primary Completion Date | July 2006 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||
| Gender | Both | ||||
| Ages | 42 Years to 78 Years | ||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||||
| Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||
| Location Countries ICMJE | China | ||||
| Administrative Information | |||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT00804778 | ||||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | chumingyidoc@sohu.com, lcscyyy@sohu.com | ||||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | No | ||||
| Responsible Party | department of emergency,beijing chaoyang hospital, society of emergency medicine of C.M.A | ||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | Beijing Chao Yang Hospital | ||||
| Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||
| Information Provided By | Beijing Chao Yang Hospital | ||||
| Verification Date | December 2008 | ||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||