Primary Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study
| Tracking Information | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | April 23, 2008 | ||||||||||||
| Last Updated Date | August 6, 2009 | ||||||||||||
| Start Date ICMJE | April 2008 | ||||||||||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | April 2016 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||||||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Intraocular pressure [ Time Frame: 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 18 months, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] | ||||||||||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||||||||
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00666237 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | ||||||||||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||||||||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||||||||
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||||||
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||||||||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | Primary Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study | ||||||||||||
| Official Title ICMJE | Primary Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study | ||||||||||||
| Brief Summary | The purpose of the Primary Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (PTVT) Study is to compare the long-term safety and efficacy of nonvalved tube shunt surgery to trabeculectomy with mitomycin C in eyes that have not had previous ocular surgery. |
||||||||||||
| Detailed Description | Glaucoma surgery is indicated when further intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering is needed despite the use of maximum tolerated medical therapy and appropriate laser treatment. Trabeculectomy (or guarded filtration procedure) is the most frequently performed glaucoma opertion. Eyes with previous ocular surgery and certain secondary glaucomas (e.g. neovascular glaucoma and uveitic glaucoma) are at greater risk of trabeculectomy failure. Wound healing modulation with antifibrotic agents, like mitomycin C (MMC) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), has been shown to increase the success of glaucoma filtering surgery in high risk eyes. The use of MMC and 5-FU has become widespread in clinical practice. The improved efficacy of trabeculectomy with an adjunctive antifibrotic agent in high risk eyes has prompted their use in eyes considered to be at low risk for failure. A randomized clinical trial found similar IOP reduction and surgical complications with the intraoperative application of MMC and 5-FU in eyes undergoing primary trabeculectomy. Although antifibrotic agents have increased the likelihood of IOP control following glaucoma filtering surgery, they have also increased the risk of complications. The prevalence of bleb-related infections, bleb leaks, and bleb dysesthesia associated with a perilimbal filtering bleb suggests the need to consider alternative surgical approaches. Favorable results have been reported with tube shunts (or glaucoma drainage implants), and these devices have been growing in popularity. In particular, the large surface area of the Baerveldt glaucoma implant combined with its ease of insertion in a single quadrant offers an advantage over other tube shunts. Similar surgical results have been reported with tube shunts and trabeculectomy with MMC or 5-FU when studied separately in similar patient groups. A comparable rate of serious complications has also been reported for the Baerveldt implant and trabeculectomy with an antifibrotic agent in a retrospective study. The Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) Study is a multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing the safety and efficacy of tube shunt surgery using the Baerveldt glaucoma implant and trabeculectomy with MMC in 212 patients with previous ocular surgery. Tube shunt surgery was more likely to maintain IOP control and avoid persistent hypotony or reoperation for glaucoma than trabeculectomy with MMC during the first year of follow-up in the TVT Study. Tube shunt surgery and trabeculectomy with MMC produced similar IOP reduction at 1 year, but there was less need for supplemental medical therapy following trabeculectomy. There were a large number of surgical complications during the first year of follow-up in the TVT Study, but most were transient and self-limited. The incidence of postoperative complications was higher following trabeculectomy with MMC than tube shunt surgery. However, severe complications resulting in reoperation and/or vision loss occurred with similar frequency with both surgical procedures. Vision loss occurred at a similar rate following tube shunt surgery and trabeculectomy with MMC. Patients who experienced surgical complications had greater vision loss than patients without complications. The results of the TVT Study suggest the need to compare the safety and efficacy of tube shunt surgery and trabeculectomy with MMC in patients at low risk of surgical failure, including eyes without previous ocular surgery. The Primary Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (PTVT) Study is a multicenter randomized clinical trial that is similar in design to the TVT Study. Enrolled patients are randomized to undergo placement of a 350mm2 Baerveldt glaucoma implant or trabeculectomy with MMC. Baseline characteristics of the study population will be tabulated for each treatment group. Outcome discrimination between the two treatment groups will include IOP, surgical complications, visual acuity, visual fields, glaucoma reoperation, and need for supplemental medical therapy. Data will be collected at the normal postoperative visits at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 18 months, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, and 5 years after surgery. |
||||||||||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||||||||||
| Study Phase | Not Provided | ||||||||||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
||||||||||||
| Condition ICMJE | Glaucoma | ||||||||||||
| Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||||||||||
| Study Arm (s) |
|
||||||||||||
| Publications * | Not Provided | ||||||||||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||||||||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||||||||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Recruiting | ||||||||||||
| Estimated Enrollment ICMJE | 250 | ||||||||||||
| Estimated Completion Date | April 2016 | ||||||||||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | April 2016 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||||||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||||||||||
| Gender | Both | ||||||||||||
| Ages | 18 Years to 85 Years | ||||||||||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||||||||||||
| Contacts ICMJE |
|
||||||||||||
| Location Countries ICMJE | United States | ||||||||||||
| Administrative Information | |||||||||||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT00666237 | ||||||||||||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | 20071037, NEI Grant No. EY014801 | ||||||||||||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | Yes | ||||||||||||
| Responsible Party | Steven J. Gedde, M.D., Bascom Palmer Eye Institute | ||||||||||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | Bascom Palmer Eye Institute | ||||||||||||
| Collaborators ICMJE |
|
||||||||||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||||||||||
| Information Provided By | Bascom Palmer Eye Institute | ||||||||||||
| Verification Date | August 2009 | ||||||||||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||||||||||