'Effect of CRT on Defibrillation Threshold Estimates' Study
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
| Tracking Information | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | February 7, 2008 | ||||||||
| Last Updated Date | January 18, 2013 | ||||||||
| Start Date ICMJE | January 2008 | ||||||||
| Primary Completion Date | April 2010 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Defibrillation Threshold Difference Obtained in Volts (V) Between Implant and 6 Months [ Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] All patients underwent defibrillation threshold testing at cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) implant and then at 6 months. The outcome measure is the difference in DFT (defibrillation threshold) in volts between implant and 6 months. |
||||||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
DFT difference obtained in volts (V) between implant and 6 months [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ] | ||||||||
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00626093 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | ||||||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Defibrillation Threshold Difference Obtained in Joules (J) [ Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ] | ||||||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
DFT difference obtained in joules (J), % of patients whose DFT improved with CRT therapy [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ] | ||||||||
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | 'Effect of CRT on Defibrillation Threshold Estimates' Study | ||||||||
| Official Title ICMJE | Effect of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) on the Defibrillation Threshold (DFT) Estimates | ||||||||
| Brief Summary | The purpose of this prospective study is to evaluate the effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on the defibrillation threshold (DFT) estimates in cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D) patients. The hypothesis of the study is that defibrillation threshold (DFT) will decrease with 6 months of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). |
||||||||
| Detailed Description | Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) has emerged as a promising therapeutic addition in patients with drug refractory heart failure (HF). Along with providing relief of symptoms of HF, cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D) are used for the prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Although there are concerns that the defibrillation threshold (DFT) estimates are elevated in the heart failure (HF) patient population due to lower LV ejection fraction (EF) and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, there is paucity of data available to evaluate this theory. Recently, two different studies in a retrospective manner evaluated the energy requirements in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D). Burke et al analyzed DFTs in 50 patients each implanted with a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D) device and an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Although the ejection fraction (EF) in cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT- D) group was lower than the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) group, the mean defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) between the two groups were not significantly different (10.2 ± 6.1 J for the cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) group vs. 9.5 ± 5.0 J for the control group)14. In the ASSURE study, Doshi et al. showed that patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D) devices do not have higher energy requirements when compared to patients receiving modern single or dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). Although, there was a trend toward higher energy requirements found among patients with higher degrees of heart failure. Major cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) trials have showed that cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) therapy has positive effects on ejection fraction (EF) and the heart failure (HF) condition of the patient over time. But, there is no study that has evaluated the defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) in the heart failure (HF) patients over time of receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). This information will help the clinicians decide if they need to perform more invasive procedures during device implant to lower DFTs in patients who do not meet the defibrillation safety margin or they should just wait over time for the CRT to reduce the defibrillation threshold (DFT). Also, there is no published data about the stability of defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) in heart failure (HF) patients over time. The results from this study will also help to clarify whether it is safe to never test the defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) post-implant in this patient population. |
||||||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||||||
| Study Phase | Phase 4 | ||||||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
||||||||
| Condition ICMJE | Sudden Cardiac Death | ||||||||
| Intervention ICMJE | Device: Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - Defibrillator (CRT-D)
Other Name: Epic HF,Atlas+ HF,Epic II HF,Atlas II HF,Promote CRT-D |
||||||||
| Study Arm (s) | Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - Defibrillator (CRT-D)
Patients in the study who received a Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - Defibrillator (CRT-D) are indicated for it. It's a single arm study in which patients underwent defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing at implant and 6 months.
Intervention: Device: Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - Defibrillator (CRT-D) |
||||||||
| Publications * | Gold MR, Hedayati A, Alaeddini J, Payne JP, Bailin S, Sturdivant JJ, Pradhan S, Oza AL. Temporal stability of defibrillation thresholds with cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Rhythm. 2011 Jul;8(7):1008-13. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.02.006. Epub 2011 Feb 9. | ||||||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Completed | ||||||||
| Enrollment ICMJE | 77 | ||||||||
| Completion Date | April 2010 | ||||||||
| Primary Completion Date | April 2010 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||||||
| Gender | Both | ||||||||
| Ages | 18 Years and older | ||||||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||||||||
| Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||||||
| Location Countries ICMJE | United States | ||||||||
| Administrative Information | |||||||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT00626093 | ||||||||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | CRD 388 | ||||||||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | No | ||||||||
| Responsible Party | St. Jude Medical | ||||||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | St. Jude Medical | ||||||||
| Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||||||
| Information Provided By | St. Jude Medical | ||||||||
| Verification Date | January 2013 | ||||||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||||||