| August 24, 2007 |
| November 18, 2010 |
| June 2007 |
| October 2008 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Success based on overall POP-Q score at 12 months post-procedure. [ Time Frame: 12-months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] Success is determined by achievement of an overall POP-Q score of ICS Stage ≤1, without further re-intervention for POP. |
| POP-Q score at 12 months post-procedure. [ Time Frame: 12-months ] |
| Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00521066 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site |
- Success based on overall POP-Q score at 24 months post-procedure. [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Success is determined by achievement of an overall POP-Q score of ICS Stage ≤1, without further re-intervention for POP
- Success based on treated compartment ICS POP-Q stage [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Success will be determined by achievement of treated compartment POP-Q score of ICS Stage ≤1, without further re-intervention for POP.
- Success based on treated compartment ICS POP-Q stage [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Success will be determined by achievement of treated compartment POP-Q score of ICS Stage ≤1, without further re-intervention for POP.
- Success defined as the leading edge within the hymen [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Success defined as the leading edge within the hymen (i.e. all POP-Q values to be less than 0, without further re-intervention for POP)
- Success defined as the leading edge within the hymen [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Success defined as the leading edge within the hymen (i.e. all POP-Q values to be less than 0, without further re-intervention for POP)
- Mean PFDI-20 score [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Mean PFDI-20 score [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Mean change from baseline in PFDI-20 scores [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Mean change from baseline in PFDI-20 scores [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Mean POPDI score [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
POPDI is a sub score of PFDI-20
- Mean POPDI score [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
POPDI is a sub score of PFDI-20
- Mean change from baseline in POPDI score [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
POPDI is a sub scores of PFDI-20
- Mean change from baseline in POPDI score [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
POPDI is a sub score of PFDI-20
- Mean CRADI score [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
CRADI is a sub score of PFDI-20
- Mean CRADI score [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
CRADI is a sub score of PFDI-20
- Mean change from baseline in CRADI score [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
CRADI is a sub score of PFDI-20
- Mean change from baseline in CRADI score [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
CRADI is a sub score of PFDI-20
- Mean UDI score [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
UDI is a sub score of PFDI-20
- Mean UDI score [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
UDI is a sub score of PFDI-20
- Mean change from baseline in UDI score [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
UDI is a sub score of PFDI-20
- Mean change from baseline in UDI score [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
UDI is a sub score of PFDI-20
- EuroQol (EQ-5D health state) change from baseline [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- EuroQol (EQ-5D health state) change from baseline [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Mean PFIQ-7 score [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Mean PFIQ-7 score [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Mean change from baseline in PFIQ-7 score [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Mean change from baseline in PFIQ-7 score [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Mean POPIQ score [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
POPIQ is a sub-score of PFIQ-7
- Mean POPIQ score [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
POPIQ is a sub-score of PFIQ-7
- Mean change from baseline in POPIQ score [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
POPIQ is a sub-score of PFIQ-7
- Mean change from baseline in POPIQ score [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
POPIQ is a sub-score of PFIQ-7
- Mean CRAIQ score [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
CRAIQ is a sub-score of PFIQ-7
- Mean CRAIQ score [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
CRAIQ is a sub-score of PFIQ-7
- Mean change from baseline in CRAIQ score [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
CRAIQ is a sub-score of PFIQ-7
- Mean change from baseline in CRAIQ score [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
CRAIQ is a sub-score of PFIQ-7
- Mean UIQ score [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
UIQ is a sub-score of PFIQ-7
- Mean UIQ score [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
UIQ is a sub-score of PFIQ-7
- Mean change from baseline in UIQ score [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
UIQ is a sub-score of PFIQ-7
- Mean change from baseline in UIQ score [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
UIQ is a sub-score of PFIQ-7
- Mean PISQ-12 score [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
In subjects sexually active at baseline, assessment of sexual function
- Mean PISQ-12 score [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
In subjects sexually active at baseline, assessment of sexual function
- Mean change from baseline in PISQ-12 score [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
In subjects sexually active at baseline, assessment of sexual function
- Mean change from baseline in PISQ-12 score [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
In subjects sexually active at baseline, assessment of sexual function
- Incidence of new onset dyspareunia, resolution or continuance of pre-existing dyspareunia [ Time Frame: ongoing ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Length of procedure [ Time Frame: perioperative ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
From time to first incision to time of last suture used to secure VSD
- Pain score measured using Visual Analog Scale (VAS). [ Time Frame: 24 hours post surgery and at the 3-4 week visit ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Discomfort of balloon removal, measured using VAS at time of removal. [ Time Frame: 24 hrs post-surgical ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Subject perception of VSD: Awareness [ Time Frame: 3-4 week visit ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Measured by visual analogue scale
- Subject perception of VSD: Discomfort [ Time Frame: 3-4 week visit ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Measured by visual analogue scale
- Subject perception of VSD: Acceptability of discharge [ Time Frame: 3-4 week visit ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Measured by visual analogue scale
- Subject global impression [ Time Frame: 12 month visit ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
assessed on a 5 point Likert scale
- Subject global impression [ Time Frame: 24 month visit ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
assessed on a 5 point Likert scale
|
- Summary of ICS Stages at 6 month visit.
- Summary of treated compartment ICS POP-Q stage at 6 and 12 months.
- Success at 12 months, defined as the leading edge within the hymen
- Mean scores and change from baseline in PFDI-20 scores at 6 and 12 month visits including sub scores (POPDI, CRADI and UDI).
- Date of return to normal activities
- EuroQol (EQ-5D health state) change from baseline at 6 and 12 months visit.
- Mean scores and change from baseline in PFIQ-7 at 6 and 12 months visit including sub scores (POPIQ, CRAIQ and UIQ).
- In subjects sexually active at baseline, assessment of sexual function using PISQ-12 assessed at 6 and 12 month visits (mean scores and change from baseline).
- Incidence of new onset dyspareunia, resolution or continuance of pre-existing dyspareunia
- Total time in the operating room.
- Length of procedure
- Nights in hospital
- Pain score 24 hours post surgery and at the 3-4 week visit, measured using Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
- Discomfort of balloon removal, measured using VAS at time of removal.
- Subject perception of VSD by VAS at 3-4 week visit, assessing incidence of VSD displacement.
- Balloon performance as measured by inflation volume at time of removal versus original volume used for balloon inflation.
- Subject global impression assessed on a 5 point Likert scale at 6 and 12 month visit.
- Comparison of POP-Q success rates in DRI versus non-DRI subjects.
- Assessment of vaginal mesh placement using 3-D ultrasound scanning
|
| Not Provided |
| Not Provided |
| |
| GYNECARE PROSIMA* Pelvic Floor Repair System for Pelvic Organ Prolapse |
| A Prospective, Multi-centre Study to Evaluate the Clinical Performance of the GYNECARE PROSIMA* Pelvic Floor Repair System as a Procedure for Pelvic Organ Prolapse |
The purpose of this study is to is to evaluate the success of the GYNECARE PROSIMA* system in women with symptoms for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) requiring surgical correction of POP.
(*TRADEMARK) |
The GYNECARE PROSIMA* system provides a simplified mesh repair, avoiding the need for dissection outside the pelvic cavity. |
| Observational |
Observational Model: Cohort Time Perspective: Prospective |
| Not Provided |
| Not Provided |
| Non-Probability Sample |
Women over 18 with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse of ICS POP-Q Stage II or III, suitable for surgical repair |
| Pelvic Organ Prolapse |
| Device: GYNECARE PROSIMA* Pelvic Floor Repair System
procedure for pelvic organ prolapse
Other Name: mesh pelvic floor repari |
| 1
Prosima Pelvic Floor Repair System
Intervention: Device: GYNECARE PROSIMA* Pelvic Floor Repair System |
| Not Provided |
| |
| Completed |
| 150 |
| June 2010 |
| October 2008 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Candidates with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse of ICS POP-Q Stage II or III, suitable for surgical repair. Vaginal hysterectomy, perineal repair and/or mid urethral sling procedures for incontinence may be performed concurrently.
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- Agrees to participate in the study, including completion of all study-related procedures, evaluations and questionnaires, and documents this agreement by signing the Ethics Committee / IRB approved informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Additional surgical intervention concurrent to the PROSIMA procedure (e.g. sacrocolpopexy, paravaginal repair, tubal sterilisation).
- Previous repair of pelvic organ prolapse involving insertion of mesh.
- Previous hysterectomy within 6 months of scheduled surgery.
- Experimental drug or experimental medical device within 3 months prior to the planned procedure.
- Active genital, urinary or systemic infection at the time of the surgical procedure. Surgery may be delayed in such subjects until the infection is cleared.
- Coagulation disorder or on therapeutic anticoagulant therapy at the time of surgery.
- History of chemotherapy or pelvic radiation therapy.
- Systemic disease known to affect bladder or bowel function (e.g. Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, spina bifida, spinal cord injury or trauma).
- Current evaluation or treatment for chronic pelvic pain (e.g. interstitial cystitis, endometriosis, coccydynia, vulvodynia).
- Nursing or pregnant or intends future pregnancy.
- In the investigator's opinion, any medical condition or psychiatric illness that could potentially be life threatening or affect their ability to complete the study visits according to this protocol.
|
| Female |
| 18 Years and older |
| No |
| Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects |
| United States, Australia, Germany, United Kingdom |
| |
| NCT00521066 |
| 300-06-005 |
| No |
| David Robinson, MD / Medical Director, Ethicon Inc |
| Ethicon, Inc. |
| Not Provided
| Study Director: |
David Robinson, M.D. |
Ethicon, Inc. |
|
|
| Ethicon, Inc. |
| November 2010 |