To Compare the Octopus 311 and the Humphrey Field Analyzer 700 Series

This study has been terminated.
(Study terminated due to resources)
Sponsor:
Information provided by:
Haag Streit USA
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00441194
First received: February 27, 2007
Last updated: March 2, 2012
Last verified: March 2012

February 27, 2007
March 2, 2012
November 2006
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00441194 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
To Compare the Octopus 311 and the Humphrey Field Analyzer 700 Series
To Compare the Octopus 311 and the Humphrey Field Analyzer 700 Series With Respect to Reliability, Reproducibility, Test Duration, Patient Preference, Technician Preference.

To compare the Octopus 311 and the HFA 700 series

To compare the Octopus 311 and the HFA 700 series to evaluate reliability, reproducibility, test duration, patient preference and technician preference.

Observational
Observational Model: Cohort
Time Perspective: Prospective
Not Provided
Not Provided
Non-Probability Sample

All subjects

Visual Field
Device: Visual Field (Octopus 311 and the HFA 700 series)
Not Provided
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Terminated
80
May 2007
Not Provided

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Prior Visual Field

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Scotopic pupil less than 3 mm
Both
18 Years and older
Yes
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States
 
NCT00441194
HSOCT001
Yes
Not Provided
Haag Streit USA
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: James Powers, O.D. American, Virginia and Northern Virginia Optometric Associations
Haag Streit USA
March 2012

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP