Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Effectiveness of Pacemaker With Closed Loop Stimulation Compared to Pacemakers With and Without Standard Rate Response (CLEAR)
This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants.
Study NCT00355797   Information provided by Biotronik, Inc.
First Received: July 21, 2006   Last Updated: October 30, 2009   History of Changes

July 21, 2006
October 30, 2009
May 2006
February 2008   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Activities of daily living tests (6-minute walk, sweep, orthostatic) [ Time Frame: During ADL testing visit ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Composite of Activities of Daily Living (6-min walk test, sweeping test, orthostatic test)and
  • Quality of Life questionnaire
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00355797 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Quality of life [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Mode reprogramming [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Atrial fibrillation (AF) burden [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Cardiac symptoms [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • New York Heart Association (NYHA) class [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • 6-minute walk test distance [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Quality of Life
  • Mode reprogramming
  • AF burden
  • Cardiac symptoms
  • NYHA class
 
Effectiveness of Pacemaker With Closed Loop Stimulation Compared to Pacemakers With and Without Standard Rate Response
CLEAR: Cylos Pacemaker Responds With Physiologic Rate Changes During Daily Activities

This is a randomized, prospective, single-blinded, multi-center study involving approximately 1500 patients at 100 centers. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the effectiveness of Closed Loop Stimulation (CLS) rate adaption technology over both standard rate responsive technology and non-rate responsive modes during activities of daily living (ADL).

All patients enrolled in the CLEAR study are implanted with a Cylos pacemaker with CLS rate adaption technology. Any legally marketed pacing leads may be implanted with the Cylos family of pacemakers.

Prior to enrollment, patients provide written informed consent and are screened to ensure they are eligible to participate in the study. Patients enrolled in the study must have been implanted within 45 days prior to enrollment or are being considered for implant. Once enrolled and implanted with the Cylos pacemaker, the first 500 patients have 45 days to complete an ADL Testing visit. At the ADL Testing visit, each of the first 500 enrolled patients performs a 6-minute walk test, orthostatic test, and sweep test in three pacing modes, DDD-CLS(VVI-CLS), DDDR(VVIR) and DDD(VVI). The order of the pacing modes for testing is randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio. The study primarily analyzes the number of ADL repetitions performed during the 6-minute walk and sweep tests, pulse pressure during the orthostatic test, and secondarily analyzes heart rates during all three tests to compare CLS to both rate responsive and non-rate responsive pacing modes.

For all enrolled patients, the study collects additional data over a 12-month period. Patients are randomized and their pacemaker programmed to one of three pacing modes, DDD-CLS (VVI-CLS), DDDR (VVIR), or DDD (VVI) in a 2:1:1 ratio, respectively. The patients are then followed for a period of 12 months after the ADL testing (first 500 enrolled patients) or enrollment (patients 501 through 1500). The study collects the following secondary measures to compare CLS to both rate responsive and non-rate responsive pacing modes: changes in 6-minute walk test distance, quality of life, mode reprogramming, AF burden, cardiac symptoms, and NYHA classification.

Phase IV
Interventional
Treatment, Randomized, Single Blind (Subject), Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Efficacy Study
Bradycardia
Device: Pacemaker
  • Active Comparator: Pacemaker programmed with Closed Loop Stimulation rate adaptive technology
  • Active Comparator: Pacemaker programmed with standard rate adaptive technology (accelerometer)
  • Active Comparator: Pacemaker programmed with no rate adaption
 

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.
 
Active, not recruiting
1500
December 2010
February 2008   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Implanted within the last 45 days or being considered for implant with a BIOTRONIK pacemaker utilizing CLS rate adaptation technology (currently the Cylos family of pacemakers).
  • Ability to give written informed consent
  • Geographically stable and able to return for regular follow-ups for 12 months after ADL testing
  • At least 18 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients physically limited and unable to perform all or parts of the ADL testing
  • Currently enrolled in any other clinical study
  • Patients with medical reasons that preclude regular participation in the follow-ups
Both
18 Years and older
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States
 
NCT00355797
Crystal Rink, Clinical Studies Engineer I, Biotronik, Inc.
20060536
Biotronik, Inc.
 
Principal Investigator: Freddy Abi-Samra, MD Ochsner Health System
Biotronik, Inc.
October 2009

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP