| March 6, 2006 |
| July 10, 2012 |
| January 2006 |
| July 2011 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
Percentage of Participants With Composite Efficacy Failure at 12 Months [ Time Frame: 12 Months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Composite efficacy failure was defined as Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection(BPAR) of International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation(ISHLT) grade ≥3A, Acute Rejection associated with Hemodynamic Compromise, Graft loss/Retransplant, Death or Loss to follow-up.
Identification of acute rejection was based on the local pathologist's evaluation of endomyocardial biopsy slides.
Hemodynamic compromise was present if 1 or more of the following were met: Ejection fraction ≤30% or 25% lower than Baseline or Fractional shortening ≤20% or 25% lower than Baseline and/or use of inotropic treatment. |
| Not Provided |
| Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00300274 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site |
- Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss/Re-transplant, Death or Loss to Follow-up at 12 Months [ Time Frame: 12 Months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Loss to follow-up for this composite endpoint included participants who did not experience graft loss/re-transplant or death and whose last day of contact was prior to Day 316 (start day of the Month 12 visit window).
- Renal Function Measured by Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at 12 Months [ Time Frame: 12 Months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
GFR was calculated using the Modification of Diet and Renal Disease (MDRD) formula:
GFR [mL/min/1.73m^2] = 186.3*(C^-1.154)*(A^-0.203)*G*R where C is the serum concentration of creatinine [mg/dL] A is age [years] G=0.742 when gender is female, otherwise G=1 R=1.21 when race is black, otherwise R=1
- Change From Baseline in the Average Maximum Intimal Thickness at Month 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Maximum intimal thickness was assessed using Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS). IVUS is a technique for taking ultrasound pictures of the wall of an artery from inside the artery itself. It shows the thickness of the artery wall and any narrowing of the artery.
- Percentage of Participants With Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy (CAV) at Month 12 [ Time Frame: 12 Months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Cardiac allograft vasculopathy is defined as a 0.5 mm increase in maximum intimal thickness as measured by Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) in at least one matched slice between baseline and Month 12.
- Percentage of Participants With Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection (BPAR of ISHLT Grade ≥ 3A), Acute Rejection Associated With Hemodynamic Compromise (HDC), Graft Loss/Re-transplant and Death at Month 12 [ Time Frame: 12 Months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Identification of acute rejections was based on the local pathologist's evaluation of endomyocardial biopsy slides.
Hemodynamic compromise was present if 1 or more of the following were met: Ejection fraction ≤ 30% or 25% lower than Baseline or Fractional shortening ≤ 20% or 25% lower than Baseline, and/or use of inotropic treatment.
- Percentage of Participants With Composite Efficacy Failure at 24 Months [ Time Frame: 24 Months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Composite efficacy failure was defined as Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) of International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation grade ≥ 3A, Acute Rejection associated with Hemodynamic Compromise, Graft loss/Retransplant, Death or Loss to follow-up.
Identification of acute rejections was based on the local pathologist's evaluation of endomyocardial biopsy slides.
Hemodynamic compromise was present if 1 or more of the following were met: Ejection fraction ≤ 30% or 25% lower than Baseline or Fractional shortening ≤ 20% or 25% lower than Baseline and/or use of inotropic treatment.
- Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss/Re-transplant, Death or Loss to Follow-up at 24 Months [ Time Frame: 24 Months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Loss to follow-up for this composite endpoint included participants who did not experience graft loss/re-transplant or death and whose last day of contact was prior to Day 631 (start day of 24 Month visit window).
- Renal Function Calculated by Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at 24 Months [ Time Frame: 24 Months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
GFR was calculated using the Modification of Diet and Renal Disease (MDRD) formula:
GFR [mL/min/1.73m^2] = 186.3*(C^-1.154)*(A^-0.203)*G*R
C is the serum concentration of creatinine [mg/dL] A is age [years] G=0.742 when gender is female, otherwise G=1 R=1.21 when race is black, otherwise R=1
- Percentage of Participants With Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection (BPAR of ISHLT Grade ≥ 3A), Acute Rejection (AR) Associated With Hemodynamic Compromise (HDC), Graft Loss/Re-transplant and Death at Month 24 [ Time Frame: 24 Months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Identification of acute rejections was based on the local pathologist's evaluation of endomyocardial biopsy slides.
Hemodynamic compromise was present if 1 or more of the following were met: Ejection fraction ≤ 30% or 25% lower than Baseline or Fractional shortening ≤ 20% or 25% lower than Baseline, and/ or use of inotropic treatment.
|
| Not Provided |
| Not Provided |
| Not Provided |
| |
| Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus in Recipients of Heart Transplants to Prevent Acute and Chronic Rejection |
| A 24-month, Multi-center, Randomized, Open-label, Non-inferiority Study of Efficacy and Safety Comparing Two Exposures of Concentration-controlled Everolimus With Reduced Cyclosporine Versus 3.0 g Mycophenolate Mofetil With Standard Dose Cyclosporine in de Novo Heart Transplant Recipients |
This trial was to examine the impact of everolimus and reduced dose of cyclosporine on efficacy and safety compared to mycophenolate mofetil and a standard dose of cyclosporine in heart transplant recipients. |
| Not Provided |
| Interventional |
| Phase 3 |
Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Graft Rejection |
- Drug: everolimus
Everolimus supplied as 0.75 mg tablets. Everolimus was also supplied in 0.25 mg and 0.5 mg tablets for dose adjustments.
- Drug: mycophenolate mofetil
Mycophenolate mofetil supplied as 500 mg tablets.
Other Name: Cellcept®
- Drug: cyclosporine
Cyclosporine reduced dose in the everolimus arms (approximately half of the standard dose) and standard dose in the mycophenolate mofetil arm.
Other Name: Neoral®
- Drug: corticosteroids
Corticosteroids standard dose.
|
- Experimental: everolimus 1.5 mg
Within 72 hours after transplantation participants received 0.75 mg everolimus tablets twice a day 12 hours apart for a total 1.5 mg daily dose in combination with reduced cyclosporine and standard dose corticosteroids for 24 months. The everolimus dose could be adjusted to maintain a target everolimus trough level of 3-8 ng/mL.
Interventions:
- Drug: everolimus
- Drug: cyclosporine
- Drug: corticosteroids
- Experimental: everolimus 3.0 mg
Within 72 hours after transplantation participants received 1.5 mg everolimus tablets twice a day 12 hours apart for a total 3.0 mg daily dose in combination with reduced cyclosporine and standard dose corticosteroids for 24 months. The everolimus dose could be adjusted to maintain a target everolimus trough level of 6-12 ng/mL.
Randomization of new patients in this arm was prematurely stopped as of 27 March 2008 due to high mortality rate, as per Data Monitoring Committee.
Interventions:
- Drug: everolimus
- Drug: cyclosporine
- Drug: corticosteroids
- Active Comparator: mycophenolate mofetil
Within 72 hours after transplantation participants received 3 tablets 500 mg mycophenolate mofetil twice a day 12 hours apart for a total daily dose of 3000 mg in combination with a standard cyclosporine dose and standard dose corticosteroids for 24 months.
Interventions:
- Drug: mycophenolate mofetil
- Drug: cyclosporine
- Drug: corticosteroids
|
| Not Provided |
| |
| Completed |
| 721 |
| July 2011 |
| July 2011 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male or female cardiac recipients 18-70 years of age undergoing primary heart transplantation.
- The graft must be functional at time of randomization.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who are recipients of multiple solid organ transplants or tissue transplants or have previously received organ transplants.
- Patients who are recipients of ABO incompatible transplants.
Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply. |
| Both |
| 18 Years to 70 Years |
| No |
| Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects |
| United States, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, New Zealand, Norway, Puerto Rico, Spain, Taiwan, United Kingdom |
| |
| NCT00300274 |
| CRAD001A2310 |
| Not Provided
| Novartis ( Novartis Pharmaceuticals ) |
| Novartis Pharmaceuticals |
| Not Provided
| Study Director: |
Novartis |
Novartis |
|
|
| Novartis |
| July 2012 |