A Comparison of Survey Methodologies to Elicit Sensitive Information From Adolescents in Urban India

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Collaborators:
Hopkins Population Center's Mellon Grant
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
The Woodrow Wilson- Johnson & Johnson Dissertation Fellowship in Women’s Health.
Information provided by:
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00232986
First received: October 3, 2005
Last updated: NA
Last verified: October 2005
History: No changes posted

October 3, 2005
October 3, 2005
September 2004
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
No Changes Posted
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
A Comparison of Survey Methodologies to Elicit Sensitive Information From Adolescents in Urban India
A Comparison of Survey Methodologies to Elicit Information on Sexual and Reproductive Health From Adolescents in Urban India

The goal of this study is to use three different survey methodologies to evaluate whether adolescents report on their knowledge, attitudes and behaviors on sexual and reproductive health issues differently based on the manner in which questions are asked.

Specific Aims and Research Questions Aim 1: To compare adolescents’ levels of reporting of their own reproductive health knowledge, attitudes and behaviors using three survey methodologies: (1) Face-to-face interview (2) Audio-CASI (Computer Assisted Self Interview) and (3) a culturally appropriate interactive methodology.

The following hypothesis will be tested:

• Overall, adolescents will be more likely to divulge their own reproductive knowledge, attitudes and behaviors with Audio-CASI and the interactive method as compared to face-to-face interviews. Levels of knowledge, attitudes and behaviors will vary by education, age and gender.

Aim 2: To compare respondents’ levels of comfort, accuracy and honesty with the survey methodologies (i.e. face to face, audio-CASI and interactive methodology) to their reporting of knowledge, attitudes and behaviors related to sexual and reproductive health.

Observational
Additional Descriptors: Psychosocial
Observational Model: Defined Population
Time Perspective: Cross-Sectional
Time Perspective: Retrospective
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Unmarried Male and Female Adolescents in the Age Group 15-19 Years in Pre-Identified Slums in Delhi, India
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
960
November 2004
Not Provided

Inclusion Criteria:

Unmarried male and female adolescents in the age group 15-19 in pre-identified slums in Delhi, India

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Both
15 Years to 19 Years
Yes
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Not Provided
 
NCT00232986
H.32.04.02.23.A2
Not Provided
Not Provided
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
  • Hopkins Population Center's Mellon Grant
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  • The Woodrow Wilson- Johnson & Johnson Dissertation Fellowship in Women’s Health.
Principal Investigator: Michelle J Hindin, PhD Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
October 2005

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP