Comparison of 2 Strategies of Adjustment of Mechanical Ventilation in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Recruitment status was Recruiting
| Tracking Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | September 12, 2005 | ||||
| Last Updated Date | September 12, 2005 | ||||
| Start Date ICMJE | September 2002 | ||||
| Primary Completion Date | Not Provided | ||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Mortality at 28 days | ||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
| Change History | No Changes Posted | ||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | Comparison of 2 Strategies of Adjustment of Mechanical Ventilation in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome | ||||
| Official Title ICMJE | Comparison of Two Strategies for Setting Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Acute Lung Injury/ Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ExPress Study). | ||||
| Brief Summary | The aim of this multicenter randomized controlled trial is to compare the impact on mortality of patients mechanically ventilated for acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome of two strategies for setting end-expiratory pressure. |
||||
| Detailed Description | Most patients suffering from acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome require mechanical ventilation. In this setting, positive end-expiratory pressure is used to improve arterial oxygenation. While the beneficial effect on clinical outcome of using low tidal volume is clearly proven, the best way to titrate PEEP is not known. Higher PEEP levels may better improve oxygenation and reduce ventilator-induced lung injury by reducing end-expiratory alveolar collapse but may also cause circulatory depression and aggravate lung injury from end-inspiratory overdistension. This trial compares the impact on outcome of two strategies for setting PEEP. In the "minimal alveolar distension" arm, PEEP is set for a total PEEP (PEEP + intrinsic PEEP) between 5 and 9 cm H20). In the "maximal alveolar recruitment" arm, PEEP is set for a plateau pressure between 28 and 30 cm H20. A tidal volume of 6 ml/kg predicted body weight is used in the two arms. The goals for arterial oxygenation and PaCO2 are the same in the two arms. |
||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||
| Study Phase | Not Provided | ||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
||||
| Condition ICMJE |
|
||||
| Intervention ICMJE | Device: Setting of positive end-expiratory pressure | ||||
| Study Arm (s) | Not Provided | ||||
| Publications * | Mercat A, Richard JC, Vielle B, Jaber S, Osman D, Diehl JL, Lefrant JY, Prat G, Richecoeur J, Nieszkowska A, Gervais C, Baudot J, Bouadma L, Brochard L; Expiratory Pressure (Express) Study Group. Positive end-expiratory pressure setting in adults with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008 Feb 13;299(6):646-55. | ||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Recruiting | ||||
| Enrollment ICMJE | 800 | ||||
| Completion Date | Not Provided | ||||
| Primary Completion Date | Not Provided | ||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||
| Gender | Both | ||||
| Ages | 18 Years and older | ||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||||
| Contacts ICMJE |
|
||||
| Location Countries ICMJE | France | ||||
| Administrative Information | |||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT00188058 | ||||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | PHRC 01 - 02, DGS : 2002 - 0381 | ||||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | Not Provided | ||||
| Responsible Party | Not Provided | ||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | University Hospital, Angers | ||||
| Collaborators ICMJE | Ministry of Health, France | ||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||
| Information Provided By | University Hospital, Angers | ||||
| Verification Date | September 2005 | ||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||