Characteristics of Sleep Patterns in Young Adults With and Without Insomnia

The recruitment status of this study is unknown because the information has not been verified recently.
Verified April 2009 by National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH).
Recruitment status was  Active, not recruiting
Sponsor:
Information provided by:
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00177216
First received: September 12, 2005
Last updated: April 30, 2009
Last verified: April 2009

September 12, 2005
April 30, 2009
February 2002
May 2008   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score, Sleep Diary data, and polysomnographic sleep studies [ Time Frame: Measured at baseline and Week 9 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score, Sleep Diary data and polysomnographic sleep studies, specifically, the differences between baseline measures and follow-up measures, taken approximately 9 weeks apart.
  • We will examine the changes in the following, as related to intervention:
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00177216 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Self-report sleep diaries, improvement scales, Pittsburgh Insomnia Rating Scale, Arousal Predisposition Scale, and the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology [ Time Frame: Measured weekly for 9 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
During weekly intervention visits, we collect data using self-report sleep diaries, improvement scales, Pittsburgh Insomnia Rating Scale, Arousal Predisposition Scale and the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology; and clinic
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Characteristics of Sleep Patterns in Young Adults With and Without Insomnia
Psychobiology and Treatment Response in Primary Insomnia

This study will compare the symptoms, experiences, and laboratory sleep characteristics of young adults with and without insomnia.

The overall aim of this research study is to compare the symptoms, experiences and laboratory sleep characteristics of young adults with and without insomnia. Insomnia is a pattern of difficulty falling asleep, staying asleep or feeling poorly rested despite an adequate amount of time for sleep, which occurs nearly every night for one month or longer. For those with insomnia, we will look at the effects of an intervention with one of two medications (escitalopram or zolpidem) or an inactive pill (placebo). This intervention will be followed by re-evaluation of symptoms, experiences and laboratory sleep characteristics. The three hypotheses being investigated are: compared to control subjects, those with insomnia will demonstrate affective disturbance and heightened arousal; the different medications will have different degrees of effect on the two dimensions being measured (affective disturbance and heightened arousal); and PET scans will reveal different patterns of activity in the brains of groups of people with insomnia.

We will specifically focus on the syndrome of Primary Insomnia (PI), defined by DSM-IV as insomnia that lasts for at least one month and causes significant impairment or distress. PI excludes insomnia that occurs exclusively during the course of another sleep, mental, substance-induced, or medical disorder. Insomnia is a significant public health problem because of its prevalence, morbidity, and the risk it poses for the development of subsequent mental disorders, particularly depressive and anxiety disorders. Understanding the psychobiology of primary insomnia is a critical step toward addressing questions regarding its relationships with mood and anxiety disorders.

Our model of insomnia builds on two major concepts running through previous insomnia research, affective disturbance and heightened arousal, as driving factors for the sleep-wake disturbances that define PI. Implicit in this model is that individuals with PI have different degrees of each dysfunction, which accounts for their heterogeneity of clinical symptoms. Contemporary theories of affect structure suggest that these two dimensions may be orthogonal in pure form, but are nevertheless related in clinical conditions characterized by mixed anxiety-depression, such as PI. Measures of affective disturbance and arousal in this study will include questionnaires, diary-based assessments, and physiological measures.

Pharmacological treatment probes may help to further distinguish the roles of affective disturbance and heightened arousal in insomnia. We will use a benzodiazepine receptor agonist (BzRA), zolpidem, and an antidepressant, escitalopram. BzRA potentiate the effects of GABA (1), but have minimal direct activity at any other receptor types. They are efficacious treatments for insomnia (2-4), but have little effect on mood. We chose zolpidem because it is relatively specific for hypnotic versus anxiolytic or other actions (5), because it is the most widely-prescribed BzRA hypnotic, and because it is well-tolerated (6). Clinically-effective doses of even "nonsedating" antidepressants can also improve symptoms in PI (7), suggesting that direct sedation is not their only mechanism for improving insomnia. We chose escitalopram because it is neither strongly alerting nor sedating in clinical and polysomnographic studies. This "sleep-neutral" profile will allow us to use it for its effects on affective disturbance, rather than its nonspecific sedating properties. Escitalopram's specific effect on serotonin reuptake blockade and its lack of affinity for Bz receptors distinguish it from zolpidem as a pharmacologic probe.

Functional neuroimaging studies in wakefulness and sleep may also help to identify the substrate of affective disturbance and heightened arousal in insomnia. Affective disturbance in the form of MDD is associated with alterations in both regional deactivation patterns during NREM sleep, and regional activation patterns during REM sleep. These observations suggest that a sleep-wake functional neuroimaging paradigm in insomnia patients, in conjunction with behavioral measures, may help to identify which brain systems mediate heightened arousal and affective disturbance, and how these systems interact.

Interventional
Phase 4
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Sleep Disorders
  • Drug: Escitalopram
    Antidepressant, escitalopram, treatment for insomnia
  • Drug: Zolpidem
    Benzodiazepine receptor agonist (BzRA), zolpidem, treatment for insomnia
  • Drug: Placebo
    Placebo control
  • Experimental: 1
    Participants receiving an enzodiazepine receptor agonist (BzRA), zolpidem
    Intervention: Drug: Zolpidem
  • Experimental: 2
    Participants receiving an antidepressant, escitalopram
    Intervention: Drug: Escitalopram
  • Placebo Comparator: 3
    Participants receiving a placebo
    Intervention: Drug: Placebo
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Active, not recruiting
99
Not Provided
May 2008   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Physically healthy
  • Meets DSM-IV criteria for primary insomnia
  • For subjects interested in PET study only: right-handedness

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently taking antidepressants, antianxiety medications or medications for sleep disorders
  • Currently experiencing symptoms of psychiatric disorders such as major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, generalized anxiety disorder
  • Significant or unstable acute or chronic medical conditions, such as seizure disorder, tumor, liver disease, active peptic ulcer disease, arthritis, irritable bowel disease
  • Meets DSM-IV criteria for sleep apnea or periodic limb movement disorder
Both
20 Years to 50 Years
Yes
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States
 
NCT00177216
R01 MH24652, 010807, DATR A2-AID
Not Provided
Daniel J. Buysse, MD, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Daniel J. Buysse, MD University of Pittsburgh
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
April 2009

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP