| September 7, 2005 |
| December 20, 2012 |
| October 2004 |
| July 2007 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Overall Survival Time (OS) [ Time Frame: Time from randomisation to death or last day known to be alive, reported between day of first patient randomised, Oct 2004, until cut-off date 18 Jul 2007 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] Time from randomization to death. Patients without event are censored at the last date known to be alive or at the clinical cut-off date, whatever is earlier. |
| Overall suvival time |
| Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00148798 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site |
- Progression-free Survival Time [ Time Frame: Time from randomization to disease progression, death or last tumor assessment, reported between day of first patient randomised, Oct 2004, until cut-off date 18 Jul 2007 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Duration from randomization until radiological progression (based on modified World Health Organisation (WHO) criteria) or death due to any cause.
Only deaths within 60 days of last tumor assessment are considered. Patients without event are censored on the date of last tumor assessment.
- Best Overall Response Rate [ Time Frame: Evaluations were performed every 6 weeks until progression, reported between day of first patient randomised, Oct 2004, until cut-off date 18 Jul 2007 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
The best overall response rate is defined as the proportion of subjects having achieved confirmed Complete Response + Partial Response as the best overall response according to radiological assessments (based on modified WHO criteria).
- Disease Control Rate [ Time Frame: Evaluations were performed every 6 weeks until progression, reported between day of first patient randomised, Oct 2004, until cut-off date 18 Jul 2007 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
The disease control rate is defined as the proportion of subjects having achieved confirmed Complete Response + Partial Response + Stable Disease as best overall response according to radiological assessments (based on modified WHO criteria).
- Quality of Life (QOL) Assessment European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Global Health Status [ Time Frame: at baseline, at cycle 3, at month 6, reported between day of first patient randomised, Oct 2004, until cut-off date 18 Jul 2007 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Mean global health status scores (EORTC QLQ-C30) against time for each treatment group. Scores were derived from mutually exclusive sets of items, with scale scores ranging from 0 to 100 after a linear transformation. Higher scores indicate a better QoL.
- Quality of Life Assessment (EORTC QLQ-C30) Social Functioning [ Time Frame: at baseline, at cycle 3, at month 6, reported between day of first patient randomised, Oct 2004, until cut-off date 18 Jul 2007 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Mean social functioning scores (EORTC QLQ-C30) against time for each treatment group. Scores were derived from mutually exclusive sets of items, with scale scores ranging from 0 to 100 after a linear transformation. Higher scores indicate a higher level of functioning.
- A Population Pharmacokinetic (PK) Analysis for Cetuximab in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) - Serum Cetuximab Concentrations [ Time Frame: Week 1, Day 1: baseline and end of infusion; Week 7, Day 43: within 12 h after cetuximab administration. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Population PK analysis was conducted using non-linear mixed effects modeling (NONMEM) software, integrating the PK data from this study and the Phase II study EMR 62 202-011.
- Safety - Number of Patients Experiencing Any Adverse Event [ Time Frame: time from first dose up to 30 after last dose of study treatment, reported between day of first patient randomised, Oct 2004, until cut-off date 18 Jul 2007 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Please refer to Adverse Events section for further details
|
- Progression-free suvival time
- Response rate
- Disease control rat
- Safety
- Quality of life
- Pharmacokinetics
|
| Not Provided |
| Not Provided |
| |
| Study of Cisplatin/Vinorelbine +/- Cetuximab as First-line Treatment of Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (FLEX) |
| Open, Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Phase III Study Comparing Cisplatin/Vinorelbine Plus Cetuximab Versus Cisplatin/Vinorelbine as First-line Treatment for Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Expressing (EGFR-expressing) Advanced NSCLC. |
The purpose of this trial is to investigate the efficacy of cetuximab in combination with chemotherapy in comparison to chemotherapy alone in patients with advanced non small cell lung cancer who did not received prior chemotherapy. Overall survival will be taken as primary measure of efficacy. |
| Not Provided |
| Interventional |
| Phase 3 |
Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) |
- Drug: cetuximab + cisplatin + vinorelbine
cetuximab given as an intravenous (i.v.) infusion every week (400mg/m^2 initial dose and 250mg/m^2 subsequent doses) until progressive disease (PD) + cisplatin 80mg/m^2 i.v. infusion on day 1 of each 3-week cycle + vinorelbine 25mg/m^2 i.v. infusion on days 1 and 8 of each 3-week cycle.
- Drug: cisplatin + vinorelbine
cisplatin 80mg/m^2 i.v. infusion on day 1 of each 3-week cycle + vinorelbine 25mg/m^2 i.v. infusion on days 1 and 8 of each 3-week cycle.
|
- Experimental: Cetuximab plus chemotherapy
cetuximab + cisplatin + vinorelbine
Intervention: Drug: cetuximab + cisplatin + vinorelbine
- Active Comparator: Chemotherapy alone
cisplatin + vinorelbine alone
Intervention: Drug: cisplatin + vinorelbine
|
- Pirker R, Pereira JR, Szczesna A, von Pawel J, Krzakowski M, Ramlau R, Vynnychenko I, Park K, Yu CT, Ganul V, Roh JK, Bajetta E, O'Byrne K, de Marinis F, Eberhardt W, Goddemeier T, Emig M, Gatzemeier U; FLEX Study Team. Cetuximab plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (FLEX): an open-label randomised phase III trial. Lancet. 2009 May 2;373(9674):1525-31.
- Pirker R, Pereira JR, Szczesna A, von Pawel J, Krzakowski M, Ramlau R, Vynnychenko I, Park K, Eberhardt WE, de Marinis F, Heeger S, Goddemeier T, O'Byrne KJ, Gatzemeier U. Prognostic factors in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: data from the phase III FLEX study. Lung Cancer. 2012 Aug;77(2):376-82. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
- Pirker R, Pereira JR, von Pawel J, Krzakowski M, Ramlau R, Park K, de Marinis F, Eberhardt WE, Paz-Ares L, Störkel S, Schumacher KM, von Heydebreck A, Celik I, O'Byrne KJ. EGFR expression as a predictor of survival for first-line chemotherapy plus cetuximab in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: analysis of data from the phase 3 FLEX study. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jan;13(1):33-42. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
- O'Byrne KJ, Gatzemeier U, Bondarenko I, Barrios C, Eschbach C, Martens UM, Hotko Y, Kortsik C, Paz-Ares L, Pereira JR, von Pawel J, Ramlau R, Roh JK, Yu CT, Stroh C, Celik I, Schueler A, Pirker R. Molecular biomarkers in non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective analysis of data from the phase 3 FLEX study. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Aug;12(8):795-805. Epub 2011 Jul 22.
- Gatzemeier U, von Pawel J, Vynnychenko I, Zatloukal P, de Marinis F, Eberhardt WE, Paz-Ares L, Schumacher KM, Goddemeier T, O'Byrne KJ, Pirker R. First-cycle rash and survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving cetuximab in combination with first-line chemotherapy: a subgroup analysis of data from the FLEX phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Jan;12(1):30-7. Epub 2010 Dec 17.
|
| |
| Completed |
| 1861 |
| May 2012 |
| July 2007 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of histologically or cytologically confirmed NSCLC, stage IIIb with documented malignant pleural effusion or stage IV
- Immunohistochemical evidence of EGFR expression on tumor tissue
- Presence of at least 1 bi-dimensionally measurable index lesion, whereby index lesions must not lie in an irradiated area
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous exposure to monoclonal antibodies, signal transduction inhibitors or EGFR-targeting therapy
- Previous chemotherapy for NSCLC
- Documented or symptomatic brain metastasis
- Superior vena cava syndrome contra-indicating hydration
- Previous malignancy in the last 5 years except basal cell carcinoma of the skin or pre-invasive carcinoma of the cervix
|
| Both |
| 18 Years and older |
| No |
| Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects |
| Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Chile, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Korea, Republic of, Mexico, Netherlands, Poland, Russian Federation, Singapore, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom |
| |
| NCT00148798 |
| EMR 62202-046 |
| Yes |
| Merck KGaA |
| Merck KGaA |
| Not Provided
| Principal Investigator: |
Robert Pirker, Professor |
Universitätsklinik für Innere Medizin I, Wien |
|
|
| Merck KGaA |
| December 2012 |