Efficacy of Acupuncture With Physical Therapy for Knee Osteo-Arthritis

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by:
National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM)
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00035399
First received: May 3, 2002
Last updated: August 11, 2008
Last verified: August 2008

May 3, 2002
August 11, 2008
March 2002
March 2007   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Not Provided
Not Provided
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00035399 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Efficacy of Acupuncture With Physical Therapy for Knee Osteo-Arthritis
Efficacy of Acupuncture With Physical Therapy for Knee Osteo-Arthritis

This study will examine the efficacy of acupuncture in combination with exercise physical therapy for moderate osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee.

Acupuncture is an ancient Chinese technique of using a fine needle to stimulate points along theoretical meridians of energy to correct imbalances thought to be responsible for specific disease states. In the United States, acupuncture is often used for the treatment of painful conditions. The 1997 NIH Consensus Conference concluded that there was adequate evidence of efficacy in an acute dental pain model and in nausea. In chronic pain, most studies were too small, poorly designed, poorly executed, or improperly controlled to adequately demonstrate that needle acupuncture worked better than sham acupuncture, placebo, standard medical therapy, or even no treatment. Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee has been proposed as a good model to test the efficacy of acupuncture in a chronic pain condition because it is an extremely common, well defined, and disabling condition with well established outcome measures for symptoms and functional status. There is clinical trial evidence of efficacy for the standard treatments of acetaminophen and NSAIDs, and exercise physical therapy (EPT), which is usually added when the patient develops functional limitations. One high quality study of acupuncture for knee OA, demonstrated moderate benefit in an unblinded comparison to a usual care control group. As such, a major question remains about whether acupuncture, used in addition to exercise therapy, will provide a clinically meaningful improvement in pain and function. Since pain can be the primary limiting factor in improved exercise capacity, if acupuncture has any efficacy in reducing the pain of knee OA, then the combination with an EPT program should be substantially more effective than EPT alone. Another major concern is that the effect of the acupuncture may be predominantly mediated by non- specific placebo effects rather than the specific effects of the placement of a needle. Another important component of this proposal is our use of a validated blinded placebo needle instead of sham acupuncture points. Therefore, the primary goal of this proposal is to use a properly designed randomized blinded clinical trial, using American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommended outcome measures, to determine whether the addition of acupuncture to standard EPT provides an overall clinically important benefit to patients with symptomatic knee OA compared to placebo acupuncture. As a secondary goal, we will use the clinical trial data to develop prognostic and etiologic models for the patients that are most likely to respond to acupuncture. If a clinically important benefit for acupuncture is found, a broader application of this technique would be justified. However, if the results are negative, then the addition of acupuncture to EPT should be generally curtailed.

Interventional
Phase 3
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double-Blind
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Osteoarthritis
Procedure: Acupuncture
Not Provided
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
300
March 2007
March 2007   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

INCLUSION CRITERIA

  • X-ray proven osteoarthritis of the knee - Kellgren level 2 or greater
  • More than 3 months of moderate knee pain
  • Previous trial of NSAIDs or acetaminophen
  • Physician referral for at least 6 physical therapy treatments
  • Capacity to understand the requirements of the study and complete questionnaires

    • Average knee pain with movement, 4 or above, during the last week

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

  • Average hip, back, ankle pain is greater than average knee pain (scale 1-10)
  • Back, hip or ankle pain substantially interferes with patient knee assessment
  • History of gout

    • Acupuncture in the last year
    • Moderate or greater hip or ankle pain greater than 3 daily
    • Local corticosteroid injection into the effected knee within the past 4 weeks
    • Hyaluronidase within the past 6 months
    • Bleeding disorder or current use of Coumadin or Heparin
    • Cardiac or pulmonary disease limiting exercise tolerance enough to limit the standard exercise physical therapy
    • History of alcohol or drug abuse within the past 6 months
    • Unable to complete a six minute walk test
Both
40 Years and older
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States
 
NCT00035399
R01 AT000304-01A1
Yes
John T. Farrar, MD, PhD, University of Pennsylvania
National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM)
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: John T. Farrar, MD, PhD University of Pennsylvania
National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM)
August 2008

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP