A Phase 3 Study of Ganetespib in Combination With Docetaxel Versus Docetaxel Alone in Patients With Advanced NSCLC (Galaxy 2)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to determine whether combining ganetespib (STA-9090) with docetaxel is more effective than docetaxel alone in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Non-Small-Cell Lung Adenocarcinoma Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IIIB Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic |
Drug: Arm A: single agent docetaxel Drug: Arm B: Combination of ganetespib and docetaxel |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Randomized, Phase 3 Study of Ganetespib in Combination With Docetaxel Versus Docetaxel Alone in Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Adenocarcinoma |
- Overall survival [ Time Frame: 19 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Progression-free survival [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Overall Response Rate [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Disease control rate [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Duration of treatment [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Duration of response [ Time Frame: 19 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Symptom improvement [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Symptom improvement will be evaluated based on patient responses to quality of life questionnaires.
- Qualitative and quantitative toxicities [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]As measured by adverse event rates, physical examination and laboratory evaluations
- Clinical efficacy in biomarker-defined subpopulations. [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Evaluate clinical efficacy in biomarker-defined subpopulations by use of transcriptional and proteomic profiling,analysis of genetic aberrations DNA derived from the tumor tissue and plasma samples.
- Number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability [ Time Frame: 19 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Exploratory biomarker analyses [ Time Frame: 19 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Exploratory biomarker analyses will examine potential predictive biomarkers for correlation with ganetespib activity and safety.
| Estimated Enrollment: | 500 |
| Study Start Date: | March 2013 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | April 2015 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | October 2014 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
| Active Comparator: Single agent docetaxel |
Drug: Arm A: single agent docetaxel
Single agent docetaxel 75 mg/m2
|
| Experimental: Combination of ganetespib and docetaxel |
Drug: Arm B: Combination of ganetespib and docetaxel
ganetespib 150 mg/m2 in combination with docetaxel 75 mg/m2
|
Detailed Description:
Preliminary signals of clinical activity of ganetespib as a single agent have been observed in patients with advanced NSCLC. A Phase 2b/3 Study (9090-08) was initiated to evaluate the safety and activity of ganetespib in combination with docetaxel vs. docetaxel alone in NSCLC. Study 9090-08 is ongoing. Results from an interim analysis show that the combination has been well tolerated and an encouraging improvement in efficacy, including overall survival(OS) has been observed.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Stage IIIB or IV NSCLC
- Eastern Oncology Cooperative Group (ECOG) Performance Status 0 or 1
- Prior therapy defined as 1 prior systemic therapy for advanced disease
- Documented disease progression during or following most first line therapy for advanced disease
- Adequate hematologic, hepatic, renal function
Exclusion Criteria:
- Predominantly squamous, adenosquamous or unclear histologic type
- Active or untreated CNS metastases
- Active malignancies other than NSCLC within the last 5 years with the exception of adequately treated cone-biopsied in situ carcinoma of the cervix uteri or basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin
- Serious cardiac illness or medical conditions
- Pregnant or lactating women
- Uncontrolled intercurrent illness
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Synta Pharmaceuticals ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center | 855-499-9664 | 9090-14_StudyInfo@SyntaPharma.com |
| Hungary | |
| Synta Pharmaceuticals Investigative Site | Recruiting |
| Budapest, Hungary, H-1121 | |
| Romania | |
| Synta Pharmaceuticals Investigative Site | Recruiting |
| Bucharest, Romania, 050098 | |
| Synta Pharmaceuticals Investigative Site | Recruiting |
| Bucharest, Romania, 022328 | |
| Synta Pharmaceuticals Investigative Site | Recruiting |
| Bucharest, Romania, 030171 | |
| Synta Pharmaceuticals Investigative Site | Recruiting |
| Cluj Napoca, Romania, 400058 | |
| Synta Pharmaceuticals Investigative Site | Recruiting |
| Craiova, Romania, 200385 | |
| Synta Pharmaceuticals Investigative Site | Recruiting |
| Timisoara, Romania, 300239 | |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Synta Pharmaceuticals Corp. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01798485 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 9090-14 |
| Study First Received: | February 4, 2013 |
| Last Updated: | May 3, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration Belgium: Federal Agency for Medicinal Products and Health Products Bosnia: Federal Ministry of Health Canada: Health Canada Croatia: Ministry of Health and Social Care Czech Republic: State Institute for Drug Control France: L’Agence nationale de sécurité du médicament et des produits de santé Germany: Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices Hungary: National Institute of Pharmacy Italy: The Italian Medicines Agency Netherlands: Medicines Evaluation Board (MEB) Poland: Office for Registration of Medicinal Products, Medical Devices and Biocidal Products Romania: National Medicines Agency Russia: Pharmacological Committee, Ministry of Health Serbia and Montenegro: Agency for Drugs and Medicinal Devices Spain: Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios Ukraine: State Pharmacological Center - Ministry of Health United Kingdom: Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Adenocarcinoma Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung Lung Neoplasms Neoplasms Neoplasms, Second Primary Carcinoma Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial Neoplasms by Histologic Type Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous Carcinoma, Bronchogenic |
Bronchial Neoplasms Respiratory Tract Neoplasms Thoracic Neoplasms Neoplasms by Site Lung Diseases Respiratory Tract Diseases Docetaxel Antineoplastic Agents Therapeutic Uses Pharmacologic Actions |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013